Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Paper 56: Defining Clinically Significant Outcomes After Gluteus Medius Repair at 5-Years

View through CrossRef
Objectives: To define minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) at a minimum of 5-years for patients undergoing endoscopic and open gluteus medius repair. Methods: A retrospective review was performed of prospectively collected data from all patients undergoing primary open or endoscopic repair of gluteus medius tears between January 2012 and December 2015 with a minimum 5-years follow-up. Patient data collected included patient demographics, preoperative clinical function scores, and pre and postoperative patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Patient reported outcome measures included the Hip Outcome Score Activities of Daily Living (HOS-ADL) and Sports Subscale (HOS-SS), Modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) and Internation Hip Outcome Tool 12 questions (iHOT-12). The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) values were calculated for each PRO using the distribution method while PASS was determined via the anchor-based method utilizing ROC curves and Youden’s index using SPSS Statistics (Version 27, IBM, Armonk, NY). Results: A total of 46 patients were included in the study. A majority of patients were female (91.3%), with an average age and BMI of 61.26 ± 9.74 and 27.42 ± 6.02, respectively. Differences in preoperative and 5-year postoperative PROs were statistically significant for each of the four measures (p<0.001). The MCID threshold values for the Hip Outcome Score-Activities of Daily Living (HOS-ADL), Sport-Specific (HOS-SS) subscale, modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), and the international Hip Outcome Tool-12 (iHOT) were calculated to be 13.1, 14.5, 12.6 and 11.2 respectively. The PASS scores of HOS-ADL, HOS-SS, mHHS and iHOT were calculated to be 85.6, 79.7, 68.2 and 60.5 respectively. In addition, 86.1% of patients achieved either MCID or PASS postoperatively, with 90.9% and 69.8% reaching at least 1 threshold score for achieving MCID and PASS respectively, and 69.7% achieving both any MCID and any PASS. Conclusions: In patients undergoing open or endoscopic gluteus medius repair, our study defines MCID and PASS at mid-term follow-up. A majority of patients achieved any MCID (90.9%) and any PASS (69.7%) at 5-years postoperatively.
Title: Paper 56: Defining Clinically Significant Outcomes After Gluteus Medius Repair at 5-Years
Description:
Objectives: To define minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) at a minimum of 5-years for patients undergoing endoscopic and open gluteus medius repair.
Methods: A retrospective review was performed of prospectively collected data from all patients undergoing primary open or endoscopic repair of gluteus medius tears between January 2012 and December 2015 with a minimum 5-years follow-up.
Patient data collected included patient demographics, preoperative clinical function scores, and pre and postoperative patient-reported outcomes (PROs).
Patient reported outcome measures included the Hip Outcome Score Activities of Daily Living (HOS-ADL) and Sports Subscale (HOS-SS), Modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) and Internation Hip Outcome Tool 12 questions (iHOT-12).
The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) values were calculated for each PRO using the distribution method while PASS was determined via the anchor-based method utilizing ROC curves and Youden’s index using SPSS Statistics (Version 27, IBM, Armonk, NY).
Results: A total of 46 patients were included in the study.
A majority of patients were female (91.
3%), with an average age and BMI of 61.
26 ± 9.
74 and 27.
42 ± 6.
02, respectively.
Differences in preoperative and 5-year postoperative PROs were statistically significant for each of the four measures (p<0.
001).
The MCID threshold values for the Hip Outcome Score-Activities of Daily Living (HOS-ADL), Sport-Specific (HOS-SS) subscale, modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), and the international Hip Outcome Tool-12 (iHOT) were calculated to be 13.
1, 14.
5, 12.
6 and 11.
2 respectively.
The PASS scores of HOS-ADL, HOS-SS, mHHS and iHOT were calculated to be 85.
6, 79.
7, 68.
2 and 60.
5 respectively.
In addition, 86.
1% of patients achieved either MCID or PASS postoperatively, with 90.
9% and 69.
8% reaching at least 1 threshold score for achieving MCID and PASS respectively, and 69.
7% achieving both any MCID and any PASS.
Conclusions: In patients undergoing open or endoscopic gluteus medius repair, our study defines MCID and PASS at mid-term follow-up.
A majority of patients achieved any MCID (90.
9%) and any PASS (69.
7%) at 5-years postoperatively.

Related Results

Gluteus Medius ve Minimus Kas Kalınlığının Üç Aya Kadar Gelişimsel Kalça Displazisi Üzerine Etkisi
Gluteus Medius ve Minimus Kas Kalınlığının Üç Aya Kadar Gelişimsel Kalça Displazisi Üzerine Etkisi
-Purpose: To investigate whether there is a difference in the gluteus medius and minimus muscle thicknesses between the cases with Graf method type IIa and normal subjects. &...
Sorption Isotherms and WaterDiffusitivity in Muscles of Pork Ham at Different NaCl Contents
Sorption Isotherms and WaterDiffusitivity in Muscles of Pork Ham at Different NaCl Contents
El pernil curat és actualment el producte càrnic més important a nivell d'Espanya. En l'elaboració d'aquest producte, l'assecat és la part més costosa i la que requereix la major p...
Posterior Exposure in Kocher–Langenbeck With Gluteus Minimus Debridement vs. the Gibson Approach: A Cadaveric Study
Posterior Exposure in Kocher–Langenbeck With Gluteus Minimus Debridement vs. the Gibson Approach: A Cadaveric Study
Objective: To quantify the posterior acetabular exposure achieved with the Kocher–Langenbeck (K–L) with gluteus minimus debridement and Gibson approaches. ...
AN EXPERIENCE COMPARING INGUINAL HERNIA MESH REPAIR VS DARN REPAIR
AN EXPERIENCE COMPARING INGUINAL HERNIA MESH REPAIR VS DARN REPAIR
Background: Several methods for fixing inguinal hernias have been documented. Anterior or posterior approaches,open or laparoscopic procedures, may be used for hernia repair. While...
Changes in the Activity of the Erector Spinae and Gluteus Medius Muscles with the Presence of Simulated Lower Limb Dysmetria
Changes in the Activity of the Erector Spinae and Gluteus Medius Muscles with the Presence of Simulated Lower Limb Dysmetria
(1) Background: Leg length discrepancy (LLD), regardless of its origin, is a very common pathology that can contribute to low back pain. Various authors have pointed out its relati...
Inside-Out Repair of Medial Meniscal Ramp Lesions in Patients Undergoing Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Inside-Out Repair of Medial Meniscal Ramp Lesions in Patients Undergoing Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Background: Medial meniscal ramp lesions are disruptions at the meniscocapsular junction and/or meniscotibial attachment of the posterior horn of the medial meniscus, a...

Back to Top