Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Comparative study of analgesic efficacy of levobupivacaine alone and levobupivacaine plus dexmedetomidine in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy

View through CrossRef
Background: Instillation of intraperitoneal lignocaine, bupivacaine, levobupivacaine, and ropivacaine has been used, following laparoscopic gynecological and general surgical procedures, to reduce postoperative pain through randomized trials for many years. Aims and Objectives: Intraperitoneal instillation of 0.25% levobupivacaine provides effective analgesia, and we have added dexmedetomidine 1 mcg/kg to compare the analgesic efficacy of levobupivacaine alone and levobupivacaine plus dexmedetomidine in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Materials and Methods: A total of 120 patients of either sex were included in the study. The age range of the included patients was 25–70 years. All the included patients had the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I and II and had to undergo LC surgeries. All patients were randomly divided into two groups of 60 patients each. Results: The mean visual analog scale (VAS) score readings at 4 and 8 h in group A were 21.48±1.80 and 25.41±2.50, respectively, and in group B were 18.14±0.90 and 20.95±1.78, respectively. At 4, 8, and 12 h postoperatively, the mean VAS readings for group B were statistically significantly lower in comparison to the mean VAS readings for group A (P<0.05). Among the A group and B group, the number of patients requiring rescue analgesia was lower in group B in comparison to group A (P<0.05). Conclusion: It was concluded that intraperitoneal instillation of local anesthetic is an easy, cheap, and noninvasive method, which provides good analgesia in the immediate postoperative period after laparoscopic surgery. Adding dexmedetomidine 1 μg/kg to intraperitoneal levobupivacaine 0.25% in LC decreases the postoperative analgesic needs in the postoperative period compared to levobupivacaine 0.25% alone and improves the quality and duration of analgesia.
Title: Comparative study of analgesic efficacy of levobupivacaine alone and levobupivacaine plus dexmedetomidine in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Description:
Background: Instillation of intraperitoneal lignocaine, bupivacaine, levobupivacaine, and ropivacaine has been used, following laparoscopic gynecological and general surgical procedures, to reduce postoperative pain through randomized trials for many years.
Aims and Objectives: Intraperitoneal instillation of 0.
25% levobupivacaine provides effective analgesia, and we have added dexmedetomidine 1 mcg/kg to compare the analgesic efficacy of levobupivacaine alone and levobupivacaine plus dexmedetomidine in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC).
Materials and Methods: A total of 120 patients of either sex were included in the study.
The age range of the included patients was 25–70 years.
All the included patients had the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I and II and had to undergo LC surgeries.
All patients were randomly divided into two groups of 60 patients each.
Results: The mean visual analog scale (VAS) score readings at 4 and 8 h in group A were 21.
48±1.
80 and 25.
41±2.
50, respectively, and in group B were 18.
14±0.
90 and 20.
95±1.
78, respectively.
At 4, 8, and 12 h postoperatively, the mean VAS readings for group B were statistically significantly lower in comparison to the mean VAS readings for group A (P<0.
05).
Among the A group and B group, the number of patients requiring rescue analgesia was lower in group B in comparison to group A (P<0.
05).
Conclusion: It was concluded that intraperitoneal instillation of local anesthetic is an easy, cheap, and noninvasive method, which provides good analgesia in the immediate postoperative period after laparoscopic surgery.
Adding dexmedetomidine 1 μg/kg to intraperitoneal levobupivacaine 0.
25% in LC decreases the postoperative analgesic needs in the postoperative period compared to levobupivacaine 0.
25% alone and improves the quality and duration of analgesia.

Related Results

EFFECT OF POSTOPERATIVE ANALGESIA AFTER PRE-INCISIONAL LOCAL INFILTRATION WITH LEVOBUPIVACAINE IN LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY
EFFECT OF POSTOPERATIVE ANALGESIA AFTER PRE-INCISIONAL LOCAL INFILTRATION WITH LEVOBUPIVACAINE IN LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY
Background: Postoperative pain following laparoscopic cholecystectomy remains a significant cause of discomfort and delayed recovery despite the minimally invasive approach. Pre-in...
A Comparative Clinical Study of Levobupivacaine and Levobupivacaine with Dexmedetomidine for Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block
A Comparative Clinical Study of Levobupivacaine and Levobupivacaine with Dexmedetomidine for Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block
BACKGROUND Sensory and motor functions of peripheral nerve can be blocked by injecting local anaesthetic around the group of nerves, which will stop the conduction of nerve impulse...
Prevalence of Iatrogenic Bile Duct Injury Following Open and Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Treatment Outcomes
Prevalence of Iatrogenic Bile Duct Injury Following Open and Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Treatment Outcomes
Background and Aim:Iatrogenic bile duct injuries (IBDI) continue to be a difficult diagnostic and therapeutic problem. The prevalence of iatrogenic IBDI increased with the laparosc...
Surgical strategies in the laparoscopic therapy of cholecystolithiasis and common duct stones
Surgical strategies in the laparoscopic therapy of cholecystolithiasis and common duct stones
Background:  The purpose of the present study was to examine the current approach and different strategies adopted for laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Germany.Methods:  A retrospec...
Nalbuphin as an Adjuvant to Levobupivacaine in Caudal Analgesia in Children
Nalbuphin as an Adjuvant to Levobupivacaine in Caudal Analgesia in Children
Abstract Background Caudal anethesia is the single most important pediatric regional anethetic technique and is increasingly per...
Three Port versus Conventional Four-Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Comparative Study
Three Port versus Conventional Four-Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Comparative Study
Objective: To compare the complications among patients undergoing three-port versus four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy at our tertiary care hospital. Study Design: Comparative ...

Back to Top