Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Microtensile Bond Strength of Composite to Enamel Using Universal Adhesive with/without Acid Etching Compared To Etch and Rinse and Self-Etch Bonding Agents

View through CrossRef
AIM: Considering the recent introduction of universal adhesives and the controversy regarding the use/no use of etchant prior to their application, this study sought to assess the microtensile bond strength of composite to enamel using universal adhesive with/without acid etching compared to three-step etch and rinse, two-step etch and rinse and two-step self-etch bonding agents. METHODS: This in vitro, an experimental study was conducted on 80 extracted sound human molars in five groups (16 each): Scotchbond Universal adhesive (3M) with/without prior etching, Adper Scthe otchbond Multi-Purpose, Single Bond and Clearfil SE Bond. Etching was performed with 37% phosphoric acid for 20 seconds followed by rinsing and drying. The bonding agent was then applied and light-cured. The e-lite composite was bonded to surfaces and light-cured. The teeth were then mounted, sectioned and subjected to microtensile bond strength test in a universal testing machine. The mode of failure was, determined under a stereomicroscope. Data were analysed using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test. RESULTS: Universal adhesive with prior etching yielded the highest bond strength (P = 0.03). Pairwise comparisons showed that the bond strength of this group was significantly higher than that of universal adhesive without prior etching (P = 0.04). No other significant differences were noted (P > 0.05). The modes of failure were significantly different among the groups (P = 0.003). CONCLUSION: Enamel etching with phosphoric acid can significantly increase the bond strength to universal adhesive. Universal adhesive without prior etching provided the bond strength as high as that provided by etching and rinse and self-etch bonding agents.
Title: Microtensile Bond Strength of Composite to Enamel Using Universal Adhesive with/without Acid Etching Compared To Etch and Rinse and Self-Etch Bonding Agents
Description:
AIM: Considering the recent introduction of universal adhesives and the controversy regarding the use/no use of etchant prior to their application, this study sought to assess the microtensile bond strength of composite to enamel using universal adhesive with/without acid etching compared to three-step etch and rinse, two-step etch and rinse and two-step self-etch bonding agents.
METHODS: This in vitro, an experimental study was conducted on 80 extracted sound human molars in five groups (16 each): Scotchbond Universal adhesive (3M) with/without prior etching, Adper Scthe otchbond Multi-Purpose, Single Bond and Clearfil SE Bond.
Etching was performed with 37% phosphoric acid for 20 seconds followed by rinsing and drying.
The bonding agent was then applied and light-cured.
The e-lite composite was bonded to surfaces and light-cured.
The teeth were then mounted, sectioned and subjected to microtensile bond strength test in a universal testing machine.
The mode of failure was, determined under a stereomicroscope.
Data were analysed using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test.
RESULTS: Universal adhesive with prior etching yielded the highest bond strength (P = 0.
03).
Pairwise comparisons showed that the bond strength of this group was significantly higher than that of universal adhesive without prior etching (P = 0.
04).
No other significant differences were noted (P > 0.
05).
The modes of failure were significantly different among the groups (P = 0.
003).
CONCLUSION: Enamel etching with phosphoric acid can significantly increase the bond strength to universal adhesive.
Universal adhesive without prior etching provided the bond strength as high as that provided by etching and rinse and self-etch bonding agents.

Related Results

AnIn VitroEvaluation of Leakage of Two Etch and Rinse and Two Self-Etch Adhesives after Thermocycling
AnIn VitroEvaluation of Leakage of Two Etch and Rinse and Two Self-Etch Adhesives after Thermocycling
Our experiment evaluated the microleakage in resin composite restorations bonded to dental tissues with different adhesive systems. 40 class V cavities were prepared on the facial ...
Self etch adhesives - An update
Self etch adhesives - An update
Self etch adhesives are one of the most recent advancements the field of dentistry has seen recently. Adhesive frameworks today are either an "etch and rinse or total etch" or "sel...
Comparison of the Shear bonding Strength of ION-Z GIC to a Resin Composite Using Different Adhesive Systems: RCT Study
Comparison of the Shear bonding Strength of ION-Z GIC to a Resin Composite Using Different Adhesive Systems: RCT Study
Abstract Background:In restorative dentistry we usually use Sandwich Technique for posterior restorations where GIC is placed below and a resin composite is placed over it....
Comparison of the Shear bonding Strength of ION-Z GIC to a Resin Composite Using Different Adhesive Systems: RCT Study
Comparison of the Shear bonding Strength of ION-Z GIC to a Resin Composite Using Different Adhesive Systems: RCT Study
Abstract Background:In restorative dentistry we usually use Sandwich Technique for posterior restorations where GIC is placed below and a resin composite is placed over it....
Effect of radiation therapy on the dentin bond strength of a universal adhesive
Effect of radiation therapy on the dentin bond strength of a universal adhesive
Abstract Background Successful restorative procedures, particularly for patients undergoing head and neck radiotherapy, rely on a robust adhesive...
Evaluation of Four Different Adhesive Systems’ Bonding Strength Between Superficial and Deep Dentin
Evaluation of Four Different Adhesive Systems’ Bonding Strength Between Superficial and Deep Dentin
The success of adhesive restorations largely depends on the optimal bond strength between the tooth structure and the restorative material. The aim of this study was to evaluate th...

Back to Top