Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Dingo Density Estimates and Movements in Equatorial Australia: Spatially Explicit Mark–Resight Models
View through CrossRef
Australia is currently free of canine rabies. Spatio-ecological knowledge about dingoes in northern Australia is currently a gap that impedes the application of disease spread models and our understanding of the potential transmission of rabies, in the event of an incursion. We therefore conducted a one-year camera trap survey to monitor a dingo population in equatorial northern Australia. The population is contiguous with remote Indigenous communities containing free-roaming dogs, which potentially interact with dingoes. Based on the camera trap data, we derived dingo density and home range size estimates using maximum-likelihood, spatially explicit, mark–resight models, described dingo movements and evaluated spatial correlation and temporal overlap in activities between dingoes and community dogs. Dingo density estimates varied from 0.135 animals/km2 (95% CI = 0.127–0.144) during the dry season to 0.147 animals/km2 (95% CI = 0.135–0.159) during the wet season. The 95% bivariate Normal home range sizes were highly variable throughout the year (7.95–29.40 km2). Spatial use and daily activity patterns of dingoes and free-roaming community dogs, grouped over ~3 month periods, showed substantial temporal activity overlap and spatial correlation, highlighting the potential risk of disease transmission at the wild–domestic interface in an area of biosecurity risk in equatorial northern Australia. Our results have utility for improving preparedness against a potential rabies incursion.
Title: Dingo Density Estimates and Movements in Equatorial Australia: Spatially Explicit Mark–Resight Models
Description:
Australia is currently free of canine rabies.
Spatio-ecological knowledge about dingoes in northern Australia is currently a gap that impedes the application of disease spread models and our understanding of the potential transmission of rabies, in the event of an incursion.
We therefore conducted a one-year camera trap survey to monitor a dingo population in equatorial northern Australia.
The population is contiguous with remote Indigenous communities containing free-roaming dogs, which potentially interact with dingoes.
Based on the camera trap data, we derived dingo density and home range size estimates using maximum-likelihood, spatially explicit, mark–resight models, described dingo movements and evaluated spatial correlation and temporal overlap in activities between dingoes and community dogs.
Dingo density estimates varied from 0.
135 animals/km2 (95% CI = 0.
127–0.
144) during the dry season to 0.
147 animals/km2 (95% CI = 0.
135–0.
159) during the wet season.
The 95% bivariate Normal home range sizes were highly variable throughout the year (7.
95–29.
40 km2).
Spatial use and daily activity patterns of dingoes and free-roaming community dogs, grouped over ~3 month periods, showed substantial temporal activity overlap and spatial correlation, highlighting the potential risk of disease transmission at the wild–domestic interface in an area of biosecurity risk in equatorial northern Australia.
Our results have utility for improving preparedness against a potential rabies incursion.
Related Results
Activity may not reflect the numbers: an assessment of capture rate and population density of dingoes (Canis familiaris) within landscape-scale cell-fencing
Activity may not reflect the numbers: an assessment of capture rate and population density of dingoes (Canis familiaris) within landscape-scale cell-fencing
not-yet-known
not-yet-known
not-yet-known
unknown
Most human–carnivore conflicts arise from the impact of predatio...
Costs and Precision of Fecal DNA Mark–Recapture versus Traditional Mark–Resight
Costs and Precision of Fecal DNA Mark–Recapture versus Traditional Mark–Resight
ABSTRACT
Wildlife managers often need to estimate population abundance to make well‐informed decisions. However, obtaining such estimates can...
Mark‐resight methodology for estimating key deer abundance assisted by citizen scientists
Mark‐resight methodology for estimating key deer abundance assisted by citizen scientists
Abstract
Florida Key deer (
Odocoileus virginianus clavium
) are an endangered subspecies of white‐ta...
Comparing fecal DNA capture‐recapture to mark‐resight for estimating abundance of mule deer on winter ranges
Comparing fecal DNA capture‐recapture to mark‐resight for estimating abundance of mule deer on winter ranges
AbstractMonitoring big game populations is necessary for making well‐informed management decisions. In the eastern Sierra Nevada in California, USA, mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus)...
GEOINFORMATION FOR DISASTER MANAGEMENT 2020 (GI4DM2020): PREFACE
GEOINFORMATION FOR DISASTER MANAGEMENT 2020 (GI4DM2020): PREFACE
Abstract. Across the world, nature-triggered disasters fuelled by climate change are worsening. Some two billion people have been affected by the consequences of natural hazards ov...
Burden of the Beast
Burden of the Beast
Introduction
Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, and its fluctuating waves of infections and the emergence of new variants, Indigenous populations in Australia and worldwide have re...
Camera traps and mark‐resight models: The value of ancillary data for evaluating assumptions
Camera traps and mark‐resight models: The value of ancillary data for evaluating assumptions
ABSTRACTUnbiased estimators of abundance and density are fundamental to the study of animal ecology and critical for making sound management decisions. Capture–recapture models are...

