Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Efficacy and safety of apomorphine in the treatment of Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
View through CrossRef
Background:
Motor fluctuations and OFF episodes are common complications of long-term levodopa therapy in Parkinson’s disease (PD) and significantly impair quality of life. Apomorphine, a short-acting dopamine agonist, is available in multiple formulations for on-demand symptom relief; however, comparative evidence across administration routes remains limited.
Objectives:
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of apomorphine across various routes of administration in patients with PD.
Design:
Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and randomized crossover trials.
Data sources and methods:
A comprehensive search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, CENTRAL, and Embase was conducted from inception to December 28, 2025. Eligible studies included randomized controlled or crossover trials assessing apomorphine versus placebo in PD. Primary outcomes were motor improvement measured by Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale III (UPDRS-III) or Movement Disorder Society-UPDRS-III (MDS-UPDRS-III) and OFF time. Safety outcomes included treatment-related adverse events. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool. Pooled analyses were conducted using standardized mean differences (SMD), mean differences (MD), and risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
Results:
Thirteen studies involving 557 patients were included. Apomorphine significantly improved motor symptoms across multiple administration routes. Intermittent subcutaneous (SC) injection showed the greatest efficacy (SMD: −2.19, 95% CI: (−3.32, −1.05),
p
< 0.0001). The inhalation and sublingual routes also showed significant improvement (SMD: −1.11, 95% CI: (−1.52, −0.7),
p
< 0.0001,
I
2
= 0%), (SMD: −1.69, 95% CI: (−1.99, −1.38),
p
< 0.0001,
I
2
= 0%) respectively. Intermittent SC injections also significantly reduced OFF time (MD = −1.62 h; 95% CI = (−2.59, −0.65);
p
< 0.00001). Adverse events were more frequent with apomorphine (RR 1.50, 95% CI = 1.09–2.06), particularly nausea, vomiting, dyskinesia, somnolence, yawning, and rhinorrhea.
Conclusion:
Apomorphine is an effective on-demand therapy for reducing motor symptoms and OFF time in PD, particularly when administered as intermittent SC injection. Although associated with increased mild-to-moderate adverse events, treatment choice should be individualized.
Trial registration:
PROSPERO (CRD42024548330).
SAGE Publications
Title: Efficacy and safety of apomorphine in the treatment of Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Description:
Background:
Motor fluctuations and OFF episodes are common complications of long-term levodopa therapy in Parkinson’s disease (PD) and significantly impair quality of life.
Apomorphine, a short-acting dopamine agonist, is available in multiple formulations for on-demand symptom relief; however, comparative evidence across administration routes remains limited.
Objectives:
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of apomorphine across various routes of administration in patients with PD.
Design:
Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and randomized crossover trials.
Data sources and methods:
A comprehensive search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, CENTRAL, and Embase was conducted from inception to December 28, 2025.
Eligible studies included randomized controlled or crossover trials assessing apomorphine versus placebo in PD.
Primary outcomes were motor improvement measured by Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale III (UPDRS-III) or Movement Disorder Society-UPDRS-III (MDS-UPDRS-III) and OFF time.
Safety outcomes included treatment-related adverse events.
Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool.
Pooled analyses were conducted using standardized mean differences (SMD), mean differences (MD), and risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
Results:
Thirteen studies involving 557 patients were included.
Apomorphine significantly improved motor symptoms across multiple administration routes.
Intermittent subcutaneous (SC) injection showed the greatest efficacy (SMD: −2.
19, 95% CI: (−3.
32, −1.
05),
p
< 0.
0001).
The inhalation and sublingual routes also showed significant improvement (SMD: −1.
11, 95% CI: (−1.
52, −0.
7),
p
< 0.
0001,
I
2
= 0%), (SMD: −1.
69, 95% CI: (−1.
99, −1.
38),
p
< 0.
0001,
I
2
= 0%) respectively.
Intermittent SC injections also significantly reduced OFF time (MD = −1.
62 h; 95% CI = (−2.
59, −0.
65);
p
< 0.
00001).
Adverse events were more frequent with apomorphine (RR 1.
50, 95% CI = 1.
09–2.
06), particularly nausea, vomiting, dyskinesia, somnolence, yawning, and rhinorrhea.
Conclusion:
Apomorphine is an effective on-demand therapy for reducing motor symptoms and OFF time in PD, particularly when administered as intermittent SC injection.
Although associated with increased mild-to-moderate adverse events, treatment choice should be individualized.
Trial registration:
PROSPERO (CRD42024548330).
Related Results
Safety and Efficacy of Atezolizumab in Ovarian Cancer
Safety and Efficacy of Atezolizumab in Ovarian Cancer
Abstract
Introduction
Although the efficacy of PD-L1 blockade has been evaluated in analyses that combine pharmacologically distinct antibodies, the specific efficacy and safety of...
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Abstract
Introduction
Tarlatamab is a Delta-like ligand 3 (DLL3) -directed bispecific T-cell engager recently approved for use in patients with advanced small cell lung cancer (SCL...
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract
The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical activi...
Pembrolizumab and Sarcoma: A meta-analysis
Pembrolizumab and Sarcoma: A meta-analysis
Abstract
Introduction: Pembrolizumab is a monoclonal antibody that promotes antitumor immunity. This study presents a systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety...
Current therapeutic strategies for erectile function recovery after radical prostatectomy – literature review and meta-analysis
Current therapeutic strategies for erectile function recovery after radical prostatectomy – literature review and meta-analysis
Radical prostatectomy is the most commonly performed treatment option for localised prostate cancer. In the last decades the surgical technique has been improved and modified in or...
Do evidence summaries increase health policy‐makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews? A systematic review
Do evidence summaries increase health policy‐makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews? A systematic review
This review summarizes the evidence from six randomized controlled trials that judged the effectiveness of systematic review summaries on policymakers' decision making, or the most...
The Burden of Road Traffic Injuries: A Global Perspective
The Burden of Road Traffic Injuries: A Global Perspective
Introduction Road Traffic Injury (RTI) pose a significant health challenge. It represents the eighth leading cause of death globally, prompting the UN to designate 2011-2020 as...
Les faces cachées de l’apomorphine : leçons passées, contributions expérimentales actuelles et défis futurs
Les faces cachées de l’apomorphine : leçons passées, contributions expérimentales actuelles et défis futurs
Doyenne de la thérapeutique antiparkinsonienne, puissant outil pharmacologique au profil singulier, l’apomorphine est aujourd’hui indiquée comme thérapeutique de deuxième intention...

