Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
View through CrossRef
The landmark Williams-Steiger Occupational Safety & Health Act of 1970 (OSHAct) guarantees the right to a safe and healthful workplace to large swaths of the American workforce. It replaced a skimpy patchwork of federal regulations primarily governing interstate commerce and covering relatively few workers. In 1970, thousands of workers were killed or succumbed to “recognized” occupational diseases, while other uncounted thousands suffered “unrecognized” occupational diseases. Nineteen states had no workers’ compensation requirements. In states with compensation plans, many workers were ineligible and benefits were meager. Data on rates and types of accidents and injuries were woefully flawed. Workers were kept in ignorance of potential exposures on the job. There were no federal job protections for workers who reported hazardous conditions. The half-century following passage of the OSHAct has seen significant reduction in work-related deaths, injuries, and illnesses. Much of the reduction is partially attributable to OSHA, but some reflects the changing nature of employment and an increased general awareness of environmental hazards. The OSHAct is both a public health and an employment law. It created the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) within the Department of Labor (DOL) to administer the law; the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), originally in the Department of Health, Education and Welfare, now subsumed within the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, to provide technical support to OSHA and to actively research new knowledge about occupational safety and health; the independent Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission, with three presidentially appointed members, to decide contested citations or penalties issued by OSHA following inspections; and the National Commission on State Workmen’s Compensation Laws, to study and evaluate the nation’s compensation systems. Here the focus will be on public health aspects of OSHA itself, and a roadmap to its structure, key achievements, and setbacks, as well as to resources produced by salient professional groups that have blossomed as occupational safety and health has matured as a field, will be provided. References on relevant political activism among stakeholders will be included because every aspect of OSHA has been buffeted and constrained by political forces.
Title: Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
Description:
The landmark Williams-Steiger Occupational Safety & Health Act of 1970 (OSHAct) guarantees the right to a safe and healthful workplace to large swaths of the American workforce.
It replaced a skimpy patchwork of federal regulations primarily governing interstate commerce and covering relatively few workers.
In 1970, thousands of workers were killed or succumbed to “recognized” occupational diseases, while other uncounted thousands suffered “unrecognized” occupational diseases.
Nineteen states had no workers’ compensation requirements.
In states with compensation plans, many workers were ineligible and benefits were meager.
Data on rates and types of accidents and injuries were woefully flawed.
Workers were kept in ignorance of potential exposures on the job.
There were no federal job protections for workers who reported hazardous conditions.
The half-century following passage of the OSHAct has seen significant reduction in work-related deaths, injuries, and illnesses.
Much of the reduction is partially attributable to OSHA, but some reflects the changing nature of employment and an increased general awareness of environmental hazards.
The OSHAct is both a public health and an employment law.
It created the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) within the Department of Labor (DOL) to administer the law; the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), originally in the Department of Health, Education and Welfare, now subsumed within the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, to provide technical support to OSHA and to actively research new knowledge about occupational safety and health; the independent Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission, with three presidentially appointed members, to decide contested citations or penalties issued by OSHA following inspections; and the National Commission on State Workmen’s Compensation Laws, to study and evaluate the nation’s compensation systems.
Here the focus will be on public health aspects of OSHA itself, and a roadmap to its structure, key achievements, and setbacks, as well as to resources produced by salient professional groups that have blossomed as occupational safety and health has matured as a field, will be provided.
References on relevant political activism among stakeholders will be included because every aspect of OSHA has been buffeted and constrained by political forces.
Related Results
COTTON GINNERS HANDBOOK: OSHA Noise Regulations and Agriculture, Including Cotton Gins
COTTON GINNERS HANDBOOK: OSHA Noise Regulations and Agriculture, Including Cotton Gins
Since its formation in 1971, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has recognized agriculture was not covered by their noise standards. However, in 2014, OSHA ci...
Occupational Safety and Health Law
Occupational Safety and Health Law
Abstract
In 1970, Congress passed the Occupational Safety and Health Act (“OSH Act”) which established a national system for workplace safety and health standards develop...
The OSHA File System: The Basis for Maintaining OSHA Compliance in Oil and Gas Production Operations
The OSHA File System: The Basis for Maintaining OSHA Compliance in Oil and Gas Production Operations
ABSTRACT
Adapting and implementing OSHA requirements in oil and gas production operatioris is an on-going challenge. To address this, Exxon's Southwestern Division d...
Awareness of Dental Personnel towards Occupational Injury- A Cross Sectional Study
Awareness of Dental Personnel towards Occupational Injury- A Cross Sectional Study
TITLE:
Awareness of dental personnel towards occupational injury- a cross sectional study
ABSTRACT
Objective: To determine the awareness of dental personnel towards dental occup...
Evaluating Effects of Culture and Language on Safety
Evaluating Effects of Culture and Language on Safety
This paper (SPE 54448) was revised for publication from paper SPE 48891, prepared for the 1998 SPE International Conference and Exhibition held in Beijing, 2–6 November. Original m...
Occupational Health Nursing as a Prospect for Nursing Students—A Cross-Sectional Study
Occupational Health Nursing as a Prospect for Nursing Students—A Cross-Sectional Study
Background:
The occupational health scenario is undergoing a paradigm shift in India due to rapid industrialization. Occupational health services are important ...
Approaches to Improving Occupational Health and Safety of the Nigerian Construction Industry
Approaches to Improving Occupational Health and Safety of the Nigerian Construction Industry
The alarming figures of occupational accidents in the Nigerian construction industry, which accounted for 39.24% of the fatal accidents between 2014 and 2014, called for the subjec...
Occupational Safety and Health Law
Occupational Safety and Health Law
Abstract
In 1970, Congress passed the Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSH Act), which established a national system for workplace safety and health standards developm...

