Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Outcomes in Fractional flow reserve guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention among Indian patients

View through CrossRef
Background: Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) is a leading cause of mortality worldwide. Revascularisation of stenotic segments has been the standard of care. However, the benefit of revascularisation is less evident for lesions that do not cause ischemia, and optimal medical therapy alone is probably just as beneficial in these cases. Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) is a metric that gauges the physiological importance of coronary stenosis. This method hasn’t achieved widespread adoption amongst the interventional cardiology community, with FFR utilised in only a minority of cases undergoing PCI, especially in India. Aim: To compare outcomes in FFR-guided vs angiography-guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) among Indian patients with intermediate stenosis (50%- 70%) on coronary angiography. Methods: This open-label study was conducted on patients with CAD with intermediate stenosis and requiring PCI. A total of 80 patients (40 in each arm) were included. Patients were eligible if they were diagnosed with stable CAD or ACS and had intermediate lesions on coronary angiography. “Cases” underwent FFR-guided PCI while the remaining patients were enrolled as “Controls.” Results: There was no significant difference in terms of primary outcomes. Anti-anginal medications at 3 and 6 months were significantly higher in the Control group and the EQ-5D score was significantly higher in the FFR group than in the Control group at 3 and 6 months (p<0.05). The mean stent length was significantly higher in the Control group than in the FFR group (P=0.023). The mean number of stents used in the FFR group was significantly lower than the Control group (P=0.033). Conclusion: Management of intermediate lesions with an FFR-guided strategy was associated with better outcomes regarding angina and functional parameters. FFRguided PCI reduces major adverse cardiovascular events at six months, a finding supporting the evolving strategy of revascularisation of ischemic lesions and medical treatment of physiologically non-ischemic lesions.
Title: Outcomes in Fractional flow reserve guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention among Indian patients
Description:
Background: Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) is a leading cause of mortality worldwide.
Revascularisation of stenotic segments has been the standard of care.
However, the benefit of revascularisation is less evident for lesions that do not cause ischemia, and optimal medical therapy alone is probably just as beneficial in these cases.
Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) is a metric that gauges the physiological importance of coronary stenosis.
This method hasn’t achieved widespread adoption amongst the interventional cardiology community, with FFR utilised in only a minority of cases undergoing PCI, especially in India.
Aim: To compare outcomes in FFR-guided vs angiography-guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) among Indian patients with intermediate stenosis (50%- 70%) on coronary angiography.
Methods: This open-label study was conducted on patients with CAD with intermediate stenosis and requiring PCI.
A total of 80 patients (40 in each arm) were included.
Patients were eligible if they were diagnosed with stable CAD or ACS and had intermediate lesions on coronary angiography.
“Cases” underwent FFR-guided PCI while the remaining patients were enrolled as “Controls.
” Results: There was no significant difference in terms of primary outcomes.
Anti-anginal medications at 3 and 6 months were significantly higher in the Control group and the EQ-5D score was significantly higher in the FFR group than in the Control group at 3 and 6 months (p<0.
05).
The mean stent length was significantly higher in the Control group than in the FFR group (P=0.
023).
The mean number of stents used in the FFR group was significantly lower than the Control group (P=0.
033).
Conclusion: Management of intermediate lesions with an FFR-guided strategy was associated with better outcomes regarding angina and functional parameters.
FFRguided PCI reduces major adverse cardiovascular events at six months, a finding supporting the evolving strategy of revascularisation of ischemic lesions and medical treatment of physiologically non-ischemic lesions.

Related Results

Determinants of Cerebrovascular Reserve in Patients with Significant Carotid Stenosis
Determinants of Cerebrovascular Reserve in Patients with Significant Carotid Stenosis
AbstractIntroductionIn patients with 70% to 99% diameter carotid artery stenosis cerebral blood flow reserve may be protective of future ischemic cerebral events. Reserve cerebral ...
Solving Undamped and Damped Fractional Oscillators via Integral Rohit Transform
Solving Undamped and Damped Fractional Oscillators via Integral Rohit Transform
Background: The dynamics of fractional oscillators are generally described by fractional differential equations, which include the fractional derivative of the Caputo or Riemann-Li...
Comparative Analysis of the Coronary Arteries Flow Pattern in Secondary Myocardial Hypertrophies and by Sarcomeric Mutation
Comparative Analysis of the Coronary Arteries Flow Pattern in Secondary Myocardial Hypertrophies and by Sarcomeric Mutation
Background: Coronary flow with a diastolic predominance increases two to five times in hyperemia, mediated by vasodilation (coronary flow reserve, CFR) and, in hypertrophy, relativ...
Cardio protective effect of nicorandil in reperfusion injury among patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention
Cardio protective effect of nicorandil in reperfusion injury among patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention
Objectives: To evaluate the effect of nicorandil in prevention of reperfusion injury during primary percutaneous coronary intervention by thrombolysis in myocardial infarction flow...

Back to Top