Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

The rights to legal counsel in Ethiopia: Evidence obtained in absence of legal counsel

View through CrossRef
The Right to legal Counsel is a basic right of human rights as provided under different international, regional and National instruments as crucial elements of rights to fair trial. The presence of counsel serves multiple purposes, including the Redress of the power imbalance between the authorities and the detained (particularly in terms of knowledge of the law), deterrence of torture and other ill-treatment capacity to address arbitrary or improperly justified detention, and ability to provide an alternative record of interviews to ensure the integrity of any evidence gathered. In many Jurisdictions the confession obtained in absence of lawyers are inadmissible as criminal evidences.In Ethiopia, the Defendant/accused person to assist by legal counsel is a constitutional rights givens by our laws at National level and at different Regional state level. However practically what we have seen in area of our courts, police custody, prison the place where this right has been implemented is allegedly different from what is said by law. In some circumstance, even the law by itself seems to be incompatible with practical application of this right. Such disparity and gap of the law and the practice regarding this defendant right has great impact on the fair trial. The inadmissibility of evidence obtained in absence of legal counsel did not provided by Ethiopian laws. Even when the detained/arrested/ person can get the legal counsel ( at what time?) by itself is not clear.This in turn begs different question among legal professionals regarding the admissibility or inadmissibility of evidence obtained in absence of legal counsel. This article try to identify the position of our laws, consult different jurisprudences of the other model country and gives clue for the criminal lawyers and legal professionals as to the respection of the rights to legal counsel as basic fair trial. And inadmissibility of any evidence obtained in absence of legal counsel since it has irretrievable effects on the defense rights.
Title: The rights to legal counsel in Ethiopia: Evidence obtained in absence of legal counsel
Description:
The Right to legal Counsel is a basic right of human rights as provided under different international, regional and National instruments as crucial elements of rights to fair trial.
The presence of counsel serves multiple purposes, including the Redress of the power imbalance between the authorities and the detained (particularly in terms of knowledge of the law), deterrence of torture and other ill-treatment capacity to address arbitrary or improperly justified detention, and ability to provide an alternative record of interviews to ensure the integrity of any evidence gathered.
In many Jurisdictions the confession obtained in absence of lawyers are inadmissible as criminal evidences.
In Ethiopia, the Defendant/accused person to assist by legal counsel is a constitutional rights givens by our laws at National level and at different Regional state level.
However practically what we have seen in area of our courts, police custody, prison the place where this right has been implemented is allegedly different from what is said by law.
In some circumstance, even the law by itself seems to be incompatible with practical application of this right.
Such disparity and gap of the law and the practice regarding this defendant right has great impact on the fair trial.
The inadmissibility of evidence obtained in absence of legal counsel did not provided by Ethiopian laws.
Even when the detained/arrested/ person can get the legal counsel ( at what time?) by itself is not clear.
This in turn begs different question among legal professionals regarding the admissibility or inadmissibility of evidence obtained in absence of legal counsel.
This article try to identify the position of our laws, consult different jurisprudences of the other model country and gives clue for the criminal lawyers and legal professionals as to the respection of the rights to legal counsel as basic fair trial.
And inadmissibility of any evidence obtained in absence of legal counsel since it has irretrievable effects on the defense rights.

Related Results

On the Status of Rights
On the Status of Rights
Photo by Patrick Tomasso on Unsplash ABSTRACT In cases where the law conflicts with bioethics, the status of rights must be determined to resolve some of the tensions. ...
Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash Abstract This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...
Social Rights in Refugee Law and Human Rights Law: The Non-discrimination Principle as a Harmonization Tool
Social Rights in Refugee Law and Human Rights Law: The Non-discrimination Principle as a Harmonization Tool
The European “refugee crisis” of today may lead to tomorrow’s integration difficulties. The large-scale influx of refugees has brought and is bringing many who, unless the situatio...
Divided Loyalties
Divided Loyalties
This Article explores an underexamined aspect of the Sixth Amendment right to counsel: conflicts-of-interest that arise between defense counsel and criminal defendants based on cou...
Bioethics-CSR Divide
Bioethics-CSR Divide
Photo by Sean Pollock on Unsplash ABSTRACT Bioethics and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) were born out of similar concerns, such as the reaction to scandal and the restraint ...
White is Right: The Racial Construction of Effective Assistance of Counsel
White is Right: The Racial Construction of Effective Assistance of Counsel
The legal profession is and has always been white. Whiteness shaped the profession’s values, culture, and practice norms. These norms helped define the profession’s understanding o...
Fundamental Rights Adjudication in the Central European Region
Fundamental Rights Adjudication in the Central European Region
The protection and adjudication of fundamental rights have been playing an increasingly important role in the legal systems of Western countries since the end of World War II. Howe...

Back to Top