Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

The rights to legal counsel in Ethiopia: Evidence obtained in absence of legal counsel

View through CrossRef
The Right to legal Counsel is a basic right of human rights as provided under different international, regional and National instruments as crucial elements of rights to fair trial. The presence of counsel serves multiple purposes, including the Redress of the power imbalance between the authorities and the detained (particularly in terms of knowledge of the law), deterrence of torture and other ill-treatment capacity to address arbitrary or improperly justified detention, and ability to provide an alternative record of interviews to ensure the integrity of any evidence gathered. In many Jurisdictions the confession obtained in absence of lawyers are inadmissible as criminal evidences.In Ethiopia, the Defendant/accused person to assist by legal counsel is a constitutional rights givens by our laws at National level and at different Regional state level. However practically what we have seen in area of our courts, police custody, prison the place where this right has been implemented is allegedly different from what is said by law. In some circumstance, even the law by itself seems to be incompatible with practical application of this right. Such disparity and gap of the law and the practice regarding this defendant right has great impact on the fair trial. The inadmissibility of evidence obtained in absence of legal counsel did not provided by Ethiopian laws. Even when the detained/arrested/ person can get the legal counsel ( at what time?) by itself is not clear.This in turn begs different question among legal professionals regarding the admissibility or inadmissibility of evidence obtained in absence of legal counsel. This article try to identify the position of our laws, consult different jurisprudences of the other model country and gives clue for the criminal lawyers and legal professionals as to the respection of the rights to legal counsel as basic fair trial. And inadmissibility of any evidence obtained in absence of legal counsel since it has irretrievable effects on the defense rights.
Title: The rights to legal counsel in Ethiopia: Evidence obtained in absence of legal counsel
Description:
The Right to legal Counsel is a basic right of human rights as provided under different international, regional and National instruments as crucial elements of rights to fair trial.
The presence of counsel serves multiple purposes, including the Redress of the power imbalance between the authorities and the detained (particularly in terms of knowledge of the law), deterrence of torture and other ill-treatment capacity to address arbitrary or improperly justified detention, and ability to provide an alternative record of interviews to ensure the integrity of any evidence gathered.
In many Jurisdictions the confession obtained in absence of lawyers are inadmissible as criminal evidences.
In Ethiopia, the Defendant/accused person to assist by legal counsel is a constitutional rights givens by our laws at National level and at different Regional state level.
However practically what we have seen in area of our courts, police custody, prison the place where this right has been implemented is allegedly different from what is said by law.
In some circumstance, even the law by itself seems to be incompatible with practical application of this right.
Such disparity and gap of the law and the practice regarding this defendant right has great impact on the fair trial.
The inadmissibility of evidence obtained in absence of legal counsel did not provided by Ethiopian laws.
Even when the detained/arrested/ person can get the legal counsel ( at what time?) by itself is not clear.
This in turn begs different question among legal professionals regarding the admissibility or inadmissibility of evidence obtained in absence of legal counsel.
This article try to identify the position of our laws, consult different jurisprudences of the other model country and gives clue for the criminal lawyers and legal professionals as to the respection of the rights to legal counsel as basic fair trial.
And inadmissibility of any evidence obtained in absence of legal counsel since it has irretrievable effects on the defense rights.

Related Results

On the Status of Rights
On the Status of Rights
Photo by Patrick Tomasso on Unsplash ABSTRACT In cases where the law conflicts with bioethics, the status of rights must be determined to resolve some of the tensions. ...
Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash Abstract This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...
Bioethics-CSR Divide
Bioethics-CSR Divide
Photo by Sean Pollock on Unsplash ABSTRACT Bioethics and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) were born out of similar concerns, such as the reaction to scandal and the restraint ...
A Review of the Constitutional Court's Use of International Human Rights Norms
A Review of the Constitutional Court's Use of International Human Rights Norms
Since the World War, international cooperation has been made to preserve the peace and interests of the human community, and representative results include the creation of internat...
Ahmadou Sadio Diallo
Ahmadou Sadio Diallo
1Claims — Admissibility — Diplomatic protection — Local remedies — Claim by Guinea on behalf of Guinean national — Whether Guinea lacking standing — Whether remedies under Congoles...
From Constitutional Comparison to Life in the Biosphere
From Constitutional Comparison to Life in the Biosphere
From Constitutional Comparison to Life in the Biosphere is a monograph that argues for a fundamental reorientation of constitutional law around the realities of biospheric interdep...

Back to Top