Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Modified monitoring of abiraterone acetate-induced hepatotoxicity in prostate cancer patients

View through CrossRef
Introduction Abiraterone is a standard treatment for prostate cancer and is a preferred treatment option at the Veterans Affairs North Texas Health Care System (VANTXHCS) due to its formulation, cost, and overall tolerability. In the combined data of five randomized controlled trials, grade 3 and 4 liver enzyme increases were reported in 6% of patients, most commonly within the first three months of initiating abiraterone. Therefore, the prescribing information recommends measuring serum transaminases and bilirubin levels (liver function tests, LFTs) every two weeks for the first three months of treatment and monthly thereafter. VANTXHCS utilizes a modified monitoring approach in which LFTs are evaluated two weeks after initiating abiraterone and less frequently thereafter. The purpose of this study is to assess if the modified monitoring approach leads to an increase in incidence and/or severity of abiraterone-induced hepatotoxicity. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted within the VANTXHCS electronic record system to include adult patients diagnosed with prostate cancer who initiated abiraterone between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2022. Patients were excluded if they were enrolled in clinical trials or were receiving care from an outside provider due to lack of accessible laboratory data. The primary outcome was to assess the incidence and severity of LFT elevations up to six months after initiation. Select secondary outcomes include time to LFT elevation, management of LFT elevation, and incidence and severity of LFT elevation up to 12 months after initiation. Results A total of 274 patients were included in the analysis, of which 72 (26.3%) experienced any grade LFT elevations during the 6-month period. Of those with LFT elevations, grade 1 elevations occurred in 48 (17.5%) patients, grade 2 in 20 (7.3%) patients, grade 3 in 3 (1.1%) patients, and grade 4 in 1 (0.4%) patient. The median time to detecting LFT elevations was 8 (4–16) weeks. The median time to resolution was 4 (3–7) weeks. Seventy-five percent of the patients with LFT elevations within 6 months of therapy were monitored without any interruptions in abiraterone therapy. Conclusion The current findings suggest that the modified monitoring approach to abiraterone does not result in an increase in incidence and/or severity of hepatotoxicity compared to the previously published clinical trial data. The modified monitoring approach may have a beneficial impact on healthcare resources.
Title: Modified monitoring of abiraterone acetate-induced hepatotoxicity in prostate cancer patients
Description:
Introduction Abiraterone is a standard treatment for prostate cancer and is a preferred treatment option at the Veterans Affairs North Texas Health Care System (VANTXHCS) due to its formulation, cost, and overall tolerability.
In the combined data of five randomized controlled trials, grade 3 and 4 liver enzyme increases were reported in 6% of patients, most commonly within the first three months of initiating abiraterone.
Therefore, the prescribing information recommends measuring serum transaminases and bilirubin levels (liver function tests, LFTs) every two weeks for the first three months of treatment and monthly thereafter.
VANTXHCS utilizes a modified monitoring approach in which LFTs are evaluated two weeks after initiating abiraterone and less frequently thereafter.
The purpose of this study is to assess if the modified monitoring approach leads to an increase in incidence and/or severity of abiraterone-induced hepatotoxicity.
Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted within the VANTXHCS electronic record system to include adult patients diagnosed with prostate cancer who initiated abiraterone between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2022.
Patients were excluded if they were enrolled in clinical trials or were receiving care from an outside provider due to lack of accessible laboratory data.
The primary outcome was to assess the incidence and severity of LFT elevations up to six months after initiation.
Select secondary outcomes include time to LFT elevation, management of LFT elevation, and incidence and severity of LFT elevation up to 12 months after initiation.
Results A total of 274 patients were included in the analysis, of which 72 (26.
3%) experienced any grade LFT elevations during the 6-month period.
Of those with LFT elevations, grade 1 elevations occurred in 48 (17.
5%) patients, grade 2 in 20 (7.
3%) patients, grade 3 in 3 (1.
1%) patients, and grade 4 in 1 (0.
4%) patient.
The median time to detecting LFT elevations was 8 (4–16) weeks.
The median time to resolution was 4 (3–7) weeks.
Seventy-five percent of the patients with LFT elevations within 6 months of therapy were monitored without any interruptions in abiraterone therapy.
Conclusion The current findings suggest that the modified monitoring approach to abiraterone does not result in an increase in incidence and/or severity of hepatotoxicity compared to the previously published clinical trial data.
The modified monitoring approach may have a beneficial impact on healthcare resources.

Related Results

A case of abiraterone acetate withdrawal syndrome after initiation of upfront abiraterone therapy for high‐risk prostate cancer
A case of abiraterone acetate withdrawal syndrome after initiation of upfront abiraterone therapy for high‐risk prostate cancer
IntroductionTransient decrease in serum prostate‐specific antigen level can occur after abiraterone acetate withdrawal in male patient with metastatic castration‐resistant prostate...
Abstract 4602: Clinicopathological and genetic features of prostate cancer in Algerian patients: First report
Abstract 4602: Clinicopathological and genetic features of prostate cancer in Algerian patients: First report
Abstract Background: Prostate cancer is the second most frequent malignancy (after lung cancer) in men worldwide. It is the third most common cancer in men in Algeri...
Abstract 5758: Deletions of olfactomedin 4 gene is associated with progression of prostate cancer
Abstract 5758: Deletions of olfactomedin 4 gene is associated with progression of prostate cancer
Abstract The human olfactomedin 4 gene (OLFM4) encodes an olfactomedin-related glycoprotein, which our group first cloned and characterized in myeloid cells and mapp...
Abstract 1568: The role of CCL2 CCL17 CCL22-CCR4 axis in prostate cancer metastasis
Abstract 1568: The role of CCL2 CCL17 CCL22-CCR4 axis in prostate cancer metastasis
Abstract BACKGROUND: Multiple steps and factors are involved in prostate carcinogenesis and tumor progression. The early studies have found that tumor-associated mac...
Grade Group 1 Prostate Cancer Outcome by Biopsy Grade and Risk Group
Grade Group 1 Prostate Cancer Outcome by Biopsy Grade and Risk Group
ImportanceAdvocates for removing the cancer label from grade group 1 (GG1) prostate cancer detected on biopsy primarily base their argument on the observation that when only GG1 is...
Study on Early Prostate Cancer Antigen (EPCA) and existent risk factors of prostate cancer, Sudan: A case-control study
Study on Early Prostate Cancer Antigen (EPCA) and existent risk factors of prostate cancer, Sudan: A case-control study
Background: Early prostate cancer antigen (EPCA), a nuclear matrix protein, has recently been recommended as a hopeful biomarker for early prostate carcinogenesis. Objectives: To e...
PROSTATE CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY IN THE EAST KAZAKHSTAN REGION, 2010-2019
PROSTATE CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY IN THE EAST KAZAKHSTAN REGION, 2010-2019
Relevance: From 2010 to 2019, prostate cancer morbidity increased, and prostate cancer mortality decreased in Kazakhstan. The peak incidence was observed in patients aged 70 years ...

Back to Top