Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Rights Pluralism

View through CrossRef
Chapter 8 is both a summary of the book’s findings concerning the intersections between freedom of speech and non-speech rights and a defense of a conception of our system of rights—Rights Pluralism. The chapter describes the concept of Rights Pluralism and explains its relationship to constitutional democracy. The central premise is that liberty is most secure when governments are subject to multiple, independent, and robust constitutional checks. As the book demonstrates, the Free Speech Clause performs critical functions with respect to Rights Pluralism, including facilitating the recognition and exercise of non-speech constitutional rights and mediating discourse about rights. But as the book has also shown, a magnetic and perpetually expanding Free Speech Clause can also have detrimental effects on the premise and reality of the Constitution’s system of rights. We must recognize, exercise, and defend both freedom of speech and non-speech rights with equal vigor. The chapter suggests an agenda that will support Rights Pluralism.
Title: Rights Pluralism
Description:
Chapter 8 is both a summary of the book’s findings concerning the intersections between freedom of speech and non-speech rights and a defense of a conception of our system of rights—Rights Pluralism.
The chapter describes the concept of Rights Pluralism and explains its relationship to constitutional democracy.
The central premise is that liberty is most secure when governments are subject to multiple, independent, and robust constitutional checks.
As the book demonstrates, the Free Speech Clause performs critical functions with respect to Rights Pluralism, including facilitating the recognition and exercise of non-speech constitutional rights and mediating discourse about rights.
But as the book has also shown, a magnetic and perpetually expanding Free Speech Clause can also have detrimental effects on the premise and reality of the Constitution’s system of rights.
We must recognize, exercise, and defend both freedom of speech and non-speech rights with equal vigor.
The chapter suggests an agenda that will support Rights Pluralism.

Related Results

Modern Pluralism
Modern Pluralism
Pluralism is among the most vital intellectual movements of the modern era. Liberal pluralism helped reinforce and promote greater separation of political and religious spheres. So...
European Yearbook on Human Rights 2020
European Yearbook on Human Rights 2020
In light of the 30th anniversary of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child in 2019, the twelfth edition of the European Yearbook on Human Rights is dedicated to the rights of...
The Pluralist–Solidarist Debate in the English School
The Pluralist–Solidarist Debate in the English School
In his 1966 essay, “The Grotian Conception of International Society,” Hedley Bull distinguishes between two conceptions of international society: pluralism and solidarism. The cent...
Moral Rights of Animals
Moral Rights of Animals
Edited by Mylan Engel Jr. and Gary Lynn Comstock, this book employs different ethical lenses, including classical deontology, libertarianism, commonsense morality, virtue ethics, u...
Historical Dictionary of Human Rights and Humanitarian Organizations
Historical Dictionary of Human Rights and Humanitarian Organizations
The Historical Dictionary of Human Rights and Humanitarian Organizations, Third Edition defines the core concepts of human rights and humanitarian law. It relates the major interna...
Struggle over Human Rights
Struggle over Human Rights
The Struggle over Human Rights: The Non-Aligned Movement, Jimmy Carter, and Neoliberalism traces the origins of the relationship between neoliberalism and the modern doctrine of hu...
Fundamental Rights in EU Internal Market Legislation
Fundamental Rights in EU Internal Market Legislation
This book attempts to systematise the present interrelationship between fundamental rights and the EU internal market in the field of positive integration. Its intention is simple:...
Comparative Human Rights Law
Comparative Human Rights Law
Abstract Courts in different jurisdictions face similar human rights questions. Does the death penalty breach human rights? Does freedom of speech include racist spe...

Back to Top