Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Offshore Geotechnical Investigations with Shear Waves
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Shear wave velocity methods are well established for geotechnical site investigations on land. Presently, acoustic based systems are the predominant means of seismically investigating offshore sites. There is great potential for applying shear-wave based methods to the offshore environment to measure the shear stiffness of sediments, a characteristic that is not measured with acoustic-based systems. As the offshore industry moves into water depths exceeding 1500 m, the demand for innovative methods of geotechnical site characterization will be more pressing. The present state-of-the-practice in offshore shear wave velocity measurements is reviewed. Limitations on operational water depths and subbottom profiling depths are discussed. Lastly, a brief examination of some potential applications of these methods in the offshore environment is presented.
Introduction
In situ shear wave velocity measurements have been widely used on land for geotechnical site characterization over the past three decades. In the realm of seafloor investigations, compression-wave based methods, such as sonar and subbottom profilers, presently dominate the in situ seismic characterization methods. These methods are commonly referred to as acoustic methods and involve detecting reflected acoustic wave energy from both the seafloor surface and from soil layers within the seafloor. The primary uses of acoustic profilers are to evaluate seafloor topography, subbottom layering, anomalies in layering or lateral continuity, and potential geohazards that can be estimated from such profiles. For many applications involving engineering design, these methods are only used peripherally because they provide no direct information on the engineering properties of the sediments. The major advantage of shear-wave based methods is that they measure a basic property of the sediment, the shear modulus of the material skeleton. The shear modulus, G, of the sediment is an important parameter which is used either directly in evaluations such as determining deformations in the seafloor from static and dynamic loads, or indirectly in evaluations such as estimating shear strength of cohesive soils, the liquefaction potential of granular soils, or the in situ density of gravelly soils.
To understand the relationships for a soil sediment between in situ shear wave velocities, linear and nonlinear shear modulus and stress-strain behavior, consider Figs. 1 and 2. The stress-strain (?-?) relationship for a soil sediment is a nonlinear function as illustrated in Fig. 1 for monotonic loading. This ?-? relationship can be represented by an initial tangent shear modulus, denoted as Gmax, and subsequent secant shear moduli, denoted by G1, G2, etc., which exhibit decreasing values with increasing strain, as shown in Fig. 1. When this relationship is displayed in terms of the shear modulus versus the logarithm of shearing strain, as shown in Fig. 2, it is observed that there is a range of strains over which the value of G remains equal to Gmax. It is in this shearing strain range where in-situ shear wave velocity measurements are performed. These measurements represent effective stress measurements at the instant the measurement is performed, and they are equally applicable to very soft sediments (Vs = a few m/sec) as well as very stiff rock (Vs = several 1000 m/sec).
Title: Offshore Geotechnical Investigations with Shear Waves
Description:
Abstract
Shear wave velocity methods are well established for geotechnical site investigations on land.
Presently, acoustic based systems are the predominant means of seismically investigating offshore sites.
There is great potential for applying shear-wave based methods to the offshore environment to measure the shear stiffness of sediments, a characteristic that is not measured with acoustic-based systems.
As the offshore industry moves into water depths exceeding 1500 m, the demand for innovative methods of geotechnical site characterization will be more pressing.
The present state-of-the-practice in offshore shear wave velocity measurements is reviewed.
Limitations on operational water depths and subbottom profiling depths are discussed.
Lastly, a brief examination of some potential applications of these methods in the offshore environment is presented.
Introduction
In situ shear wave velocity measurements have been widely used on land for geotechnical site characterization over the past three decades.
In the realm of seafloor investigations, compression-wave based methods, such as sonar and subbottom profilers, presently dominate the in situ seismic characterization methods.
These methods are commonly referred to as acoustic methods and involve detecting reflected acoustic wave energy from both the seafloor surface and from soil layers within the seafloor.
The primary uses of acoustic profilers are to evaluate seafloor topography, subbottom layering, anomalies in layering or lateral continuity, and potential geohazards that can be estimated from such profiles.
For many applications involving engineering design, these methods are only used peripherally because they provide no direct information on the engineering properties of the sediments.
The major advantage of shear-wave based methods is that they measure a basic property of the sediment, the shear modulus of the material skeleton.
The shear modulus, G, of the sediment is an important parameter which is used either directly in evaluations such as determining deformations in the seafloor from static and dynamic loads, or indirectly in evaluations such as estimating shear strength of cohesive soils, the liquefaction potential of granular soils, or the in situ density of gravelly soils.
To understand the relationships for a soil sediment between in situ shear wave velocities, linear and nonlinear shear modulus and stress-strain behavior, consider Figs.
1 and 2.
The stress-strain (?-?) relationship for a soil sediment is a nonlinear function as illustrated in Fig.
1 for monotonic loading.
This ?-? relationship can be represented by an initial tangent shear modulus, denoted as Gmax, and subsequent secant shear moduli, denoted by G1, G2, etc.
, which exhibit decreasing values with increasing strain, as shown in Fig.
1.
When this relationship is displayed in terms of the shear modulus versus the logarithm of shearing strain, as shown in Fig.
2, it is observed that there is a range of strains over which the value of G remains equal to Gmax.
It is in this shearing strain range where in-situ shear wave velocity measurements are performed.
These measurements represent effective stress measurements at the instant the measurement is performed, and they are equally applicable to very soft sediments (Vs = a few m/sec) as well as very stiff rock (Vs = several 1000 m/sec).
Related Results
Ninth OTRC Honors Lecture: Geotechnical Contributions to Offshore Development
Ninth OTRC Honors Lecture: Geotechnical Contributions to Offshore Development
Abstract
The paper makes a review of important contributions from the geotechnical profession to offshore development, from the early piled and gravity base found...
Friction Corrections for Small-Scale Direct Shear, Residual Shear, and Interface Shear Box Tests
Friction Corrections for Small-Scale Direct Shear, Residual Shear, and Interface Shear Box Tests
ABSTRACT
ERRATUM: This paper published online on November 26, 2024, with the authors’ affiliations incorrectly listed as “Geotechnical Laboratory.” The authors’ affi...
Offshore geotechnical challenges of the energy transition
Offshore geotechnical challenges of the energy transition
Offshore wind is the most mature of the offshore renewable energy technologies and has a significant role to play in the energy transition. 2000 GW of offshore wind capacity is ant...
Optimization of magnetoelectricity in thickness shear mode LiNbO3/magnetostrictive laminated composite
Optimization of magnetoelectricity in thickness shear mode LiNbO3/magnetostrictive laminated composite
Magnetoelectric (ME) composites have recently attracted much attention and triggered a great number of research activities, owing to their potential applications in sensors and tra...
Benefits of an Integrated Power and Hydrogen Offshore Grid in a Net-Zero North Sea Energy System
Benefits of an Integrated Power and Hydrogen Offshore Grid in a Net-Zero North Sea Energy System
The North Sea Offshore Grid concept has been envisioned as a promising alternative to: 1) ease the integration of offshore wind and onshore energy systems, and 2) increase the cros...
Prospects for Offshore Petroleum Resources
Prospects for Offshore Petroleum Resources
EXTENDED ABSTRACT
Extending the geographic scope of offshore exploration has traditionally been perceived as the frontier for offshore petroleum development. Corr...
Observations of the soil particle movement during direct shear tests on soil-geosynthetic interfaces
Observations of the soil particle movement during direct shear tests on soil-geosynthetic interfaces
The shear strength between soil-geosynthetic interface has been well studied by conducting large scale direct shear tests. However, the documents of the development of shear band a...
Simple shear is not so simple! Kinematics and shear senses in Newtonian viscous simple shear zones
Simple shear is not so simple! Kinematics and shear senses in Newtonian viscous simple shear zones
AbstractThis work develops an analytical model of shear senses within an inclined ductile simple shear zone with parallel rigid boundaries and incompressible Newtonian viscous rheo...

