Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Plato, Machiavelli and machiavellism
View through CrossRef
Throughout this paper the author questions Machiavelli?s Machiavellism, i.e.
the position that Machiavelli?s political theory takes stance of immoralism.
The first part of the paper compares Plato?s and Machiavelli?s political
philosophy, analyzing differences as well as similarities between these two
philosophers. Author finds Plato?s views on politics and political community
more malignant than Machiavelli?s. Machiavelli?s views on politics, state,
laws and liberty are in fact closer to the basic principles of liberalism
then to the tenets of tyranny or totalitarianism. The second part of the
paper deals with the concept of the autonomy of politics and the use of
cruelties and evils as the instruments of rule in Machiavelli?s work. In this
part of the paper, author denies that Machiavelli was the philosopher of evil
or the proponent of political gangsterism.
Title: Plato, Machiavelli and machiavellism
Description:
Throughout this paper the author questions Machiavelli?s Machiavellism, i.
e.
the position that Machiavelli?s political theory takes stance of immoralism.
The first part of the paper compares Plato?s and Machiavelli?s political
philosophy, analyzing differences as well as similarities between these two
philosophers.
Author finds Plato?s views on politics and political community
more malignant than Machiavelli?s.
Machiavelli?s views on politics, state,
laws and liberty are in fact closer to the basic principles of liberalism
then to the tenets of tyranny or totalitarianism.
The second part of the
paper deals with the concept of the autonomy of politics and the use of
cruelties and evils as the instruments of rule in Machiavelli?s work.
In this
part of the paper, author denies that Machiavelli was the philosopher of evil
or the proponent of political gangsterism.
Related Results
Machiavelli and Epicureanism
Machiavelli and Epicureanism
This book investigates the influence of Epicurean physics on the argument developed in Machiavelli’s Discourses on Livy. Towards this end, the full philosophical history ...
The Wisdom of the People and the Elite
The Wisdom of the People and the Elite
Abstract
John McCormick's ‘democratic’ interpretation of Machiavelli depends on the view that Machiavelli unequivocally endorses the people's moral and political wisdom over that o...
Reading Machiavelli
Reading Machiavelli
To what extent was Machiavelli a “Machiavellian”? Was he an amoral adviser of tyranny or a stalwart partisan of liberty? A neutral technician of power politics or a devout Italian ...
Leo Strauss’s Machiavelli and the Querelle between the Few and the Many
Leo Strauss’s Machiavelli and the Querelle between the Few and the Many
This chapter analyzes Leo Strauss' engagement with the democratic elements of Niccolò Machiavelli's political thought; specifically, Machiavelli's self-avowed departure from the an...
Plato and Aristotle in the Academy
Plato and Aristotle in the Academy
This chapter considers Aristotle’s criticisms of Plato. Among these are (1) Aristotle raises doubts about and rejects aspects of Plato’s theory of Forms, (2) Aristotle dismisses Pl...
Machiavelli and Spartan Equality
Machiavelli and Spartan Equality
In this article, I explore the meaning and function of Lycurgus in Machiavelli’s thought. While the exemplarity of the mythical Spartan legislator progressively fades in Machiavell...
HUKUM KEKUAS AAN DAN DEMOKRASI MASA YUNANI KUNO
HUKUM KEKUAS AAN DAN DEMOKRASI MASA YUNANI KUNO
Plato and Aristotle are thinkers on the future of Greece that were raised in the Greek civilization. Aristotle is known as empirical-realist thinkers in contrast to
Plato who...

