Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Self-deception
View through CrossRef
In this paper I defend non-intentional conception of self-deception. First,
I?ll make clear distinction between deceiving, lying, and deluding. Then,
taking Cartesian metodological project as an example, I'll make a distinction
between self induced deception and selfdeception. To identify fenomenon of
self-deception I rely on early experimental evidence and so called paradoxes
of self-deception. I will explain in detail two main apraches to the problem
of self-deception, one of which is intentional, and the other one is
non-intentional. In this context I will try to explain why I believe that
self-deception has to be non-intentional.
Title: Self-deception
Description:
In this paper I defend non-intentional conception of self-deception.
First,
I?ll make clear distinction between deceiving, lying, and deluding.
Then,
taking Cartesian metodological project as an example, I'll make a distinction
between self induced deception and selfdeception.
To identify fenomenon of
self-deception I rely on early experimental evidence and so called paradoxes
of self-deception.
I will explain in detail two main apraches to the problem
of self-deception, one of which is intentional, and the other one is
non-intentional.
In this context I will try to explain why I believe that
self-deception has to be non-intentional.
Related Results
Deception-Based Security Framework for IoT: An Empirical Study
Deception-Based Security Framework for IoT: An Empirical Study
<p><b>A large number of Internet of Things (IoT) devices in use has provided a vast attack surface. The security in IoT devices is a significant challenge considering c...
A normative account of self-deception, overconfidence, and paranoia
A normative account of self-deception, overconfidence, and paranoia
Self-deception, paranoia, and overconfidence involve misbeliefs about self, others, and world. They are often considered mistaken. Here we explore whether they might be adaptive, a...
13 Self‐Deception and Three Psychiatric Delusions
13 Self‐Deception and Three Psychiatric Delusions
Abstract
Audi has suggested that the difference between self‐deception and delusion with respect to a false proposition turns on whether the subject believes the fal...
The Role of Computer Deception in Network Security
The Role of Computer Deception in Network Security
With the rapid development of Internet technology, computer has become an indispensable part of modern society. However, with the popularization of computer technology, the problem...
Deontological versus Teleological Views of Deception in Medical Research
Deontological versus Teleological Views of Deception in Medical Research
The need for valid research remains urgent and a priority for all authentic studies. One of the research procedures (allowed in special circumstances) is the deception of research ...
SELF-ESTEEM AND SELF-EFFICACY AMONG NEWSCASTERS AND NEWS REPORTERS
SELF-ESTEEM AND SELF-EFFICACY AMONG NEWSCASTERS AND NEWS REPORTERS
The present study aimedto investigaterelationship between self-esteem and self-efficacy among news casters and news reporters and to compare both groups in self-esteemand self-effi...
Please, Please, Just Tell Me: The Linguistic Features of Humorous Deception
Please, Please, Just Tell Me: The Linguistic Features of Humorous Deception
Prior research undertaken for the purpose of identifying deceptive language has focused on deception as it is used for nefarious ends, such as purposeful lying. However, despite th...
The Automedial Zaniness of Ryan Trecartin
The Automedial Zaniness of Ryan Trecartin
IntroductionThe American artist Ryan Trecartin makes digital videos that centre on the self-presentations common to video-sharing sites such as YouTube. Named by New Yorker critic ...