Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Self-deception
View through CrossRef
In this paper I defend non-intentional conception of self-deception. First,
I?ll make clear distinction between deceiving, lying, and deluding. Then,
taking Cartesian metodological project as an example, I'll make a distinction
between self induced deception and selfdeception. To identify fenomenon of
self-deception I rely on early experimental evidence and so called paradoxes
of self-deception. I will explain in detail two main apraches to the problem
of self-deception, one of which is intentional, and the other one is
non-intentional. In this context I will try to explain why I believe that
self-deception has to be non-intentional.
Title: Self-deception
Description:
In this paper I defend non-intentional conception of self-deception.
First,
I?ll make clear distinction between deceiving, lying, and deluding.
Then,
taking Cartesian metodological project as an example, I'll make a distinction
between self induced deception and selfdeception.
To identify fenomenon of
self-deception I rely on early experimental evidence and so called paradoxes
of self-deception.
I will explain in detail two main apraches to the problem
of self-deception, one of which is intentional, and the other one is
non-intentional.
In this context I will try to explain why I believe that
self-deception has to be non-intentional.
Related Results
Institutional self-deception
Institutional self-deception
There are many examples of institutions which have made false claims, or performed certain acts, that have had, to varying degrees, a negative impact on their societies. For exampl...
Does Social Media Provoked to Cyber Deception? An Illustrative Based Study of Youth
Does Social Media Provoked to Cyber Deception? An Illustrative Based Study of Youth
Purpose: The present study was conducted with the sole aim to explore the role of social media in promotion of cyber deception among youth which further lead to deviance among the ...
Deception-Based Security Framework for IoT: An Empirical Study
Deception-Based Security Framework for IoT: An Empirical Study
<p><b>A large number of Internet of Things (IoT) devices in use has provided a vast attack surface. The security in IoT devices is a significant challenge considering c...
A normative account of self-deception, overconfidence, and paranoia
A normative account of self-deception, overconfidence, and paranoia
Self-deception, paranoia, and overconfidence involve misbeliefs about self, others, and world. They are often considered mistaken. Here we explore whether they might be adaptive, a...
13 Self‐Deception and Three Psychiatric Delusions
13 Self‐Deception and Three Psychiatric Delusions
Abstract
Audi has suggested that the difference between self‐deception and delusion with respect to a false proposition turns on whether the subject believes the fal...
The Role of Computer Deception in Network Security
The Role of Computer Deception in Network Security
With the rapid development of Internet technology, computer has become an indispensable part of modern society. However, with the popularization of computer technology, the problem...
Deontological versus Teleological Views of Deception in Medical Research
Deontological versus Teleological Views of Deception in Medical Research
The need for valid research remains urgent and a priority for all authentic studies. One of the research procedures (allowed in special circumstances) is the deception of research ...
An Idiographic Paradigm for Research on Cues to Deception: An Urgent Proposal
An Idiographic Paradigm for Research on Cues to Deception: An Urgent Proposal
We introduce a novel individual-focused paradigm to the scientific study of deception cues. Past research on deception cues compares the behavior of truth tellers and liars at the ...

