Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Evaluation of Resident Presentations Using a DEI Checklist
View through CrossRef
Background: In 2021, the Indiana University School of Medicine Department of Emergency Medicine developed a DEI checklist for residents presenting to their colleagues during weekly didactic sessions. The purpose of this present study is to evaluate the implementation of this DEI checklist as determined by its impact on resident presentations.
Methods: A Qualtrics survey based on the DEI checklist was produced to collect data from a Kaltura database containing all resident lectures from the years 2018-19 through 2023-24. Ten lectures were analyzed from each year for 50 total lectures. The year 2020-21 was excluded. Data collected was subjected to quantitative statistics using content analysis. Transcripts for each lecture were generated using Otter.ai and analyzed qualitatively to draw conclusions from how residents discussed DEI topics.
Results: Each year was assigned an average overall composite score according to the checklist items, with a score of zero indicating complete adherence to the checklist. The results were as follows: 2018-19: 1.8; 2019-20: 2.3; 2021-22: 2.3; 2022-23: 1.2; 2023-24: 0.8. Residents discussed how their topic may affect someone of a diverse background in 70% of lectures in 2018-2019; 70% in 2019-20; 50% in 2021-22; 80% in 2022-23; and 80% in 2023-24. The percentage of presentations with a dedicated DEI/health equity slide gradually increased from 20% of lectures in 2018-19 to 80% in 2023-24. Transcript review revealed residents transitioned from indirectly discussing health equity in 2018 to directly addressing DEI from 2022-24.
Conclusion: Our analysis indicates a general trend towards increasing attention to health equity among these residents. Residents showed more intentionality in approaching DEI topics by directly addressing them in later years.
Impact and Implications: Current literature provides no widely agreed upon methodology for determining the impact of DEI training in graduate medical education. Our study provides a novel technique for operationalizing this impact.
Title: Evaluation of Resident Presentations Using a DEI Checklist
Description:
Background: In 2021, the Indiana University School of Medicine Department of Emergency Medicine developed a DEI checklist for residents presenting to their colleagues during weekly didactic sessions.
The purpose of this present study is to evaluate the implementation of this DEI checklist as determined by its impact on resident presentations.
Methods: A Qualtrics survey based on the DEI checklist was produced to collect data from a Kaltura database containing all resident lectures from the years 2018-19 through 2023-24.
Ten lectures were analyzed from each year for 50 total lectures.
The year 2020-21 was excluded.
Data collected was subjected to quantitative statistics using content analysis.
Transcripts for each lecture were generated using Otter.
ai and analyzed qualitatively to draw conclusions from how residents discussed DEI topics.
Results: Each year was assigned an average overall composite score according to the checklist items, with a score of zero indicating complete adherence to the checklist.
The results were as follows: 2018-19: 1.
8; 2019-20: 2.
3; 2021-22: 2.
3; 2022-23: 1.
2; 2023-24: 0.
8.
Residents discussed how their topic may affect someone of a diverse background in 70% of lectures in 2018-2019; 70% in 2019-20; 50% in 2021-22; 80% in 2022-23; and 80% in 2023-24.
The percentage of presentations with a dedicated DEI/health equity slide gradually increased from 20% of lectures in 2018-19 to 80% in 2023-24.
Transcript review revealed residents transitioned from indirectly discussing health equity in 2018 to directly addressing DEI from 2022-24.
Conclusion: Our analysis indicates a general trend towards increasing attention to health equity among these residents.
Residents showed more intentionality in approaching DEI topics by directly addressing them in later years.
Impact and Implications: Current literature provides no widely agreed upon methodology for determining the impact of DEI training in graduate medical education.
Our study provides a novel technique for operationalizing this impact.
Related Results
Resident Research Mentoring Teams: A Support Program to Increase Resident Research Productivity [A64]
Resident Research Mentoring Teams: A Support Program to Increase Resident Research Productivity [A64]
INTRODUCTION:
Inspiring, supporting, and disseminating resident scholarly activity can be difficult for residency programs. In an effort to stimulate more resident and ...
Role of line managers in promoting DEI in higher education institution: an autoethnographic case study
Role of line managers in promoting DEI in higher education institution: an autoethnographic case study
PurposeThe purpose of this study is to analyse the role of line management in promoting Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) in Higher Education Institutions (HEIs). Transformatio...
Resident Satisfaction Indicators in Long-Term Care Settings
Resident Satisfaction Indicators in Long-Term Care Settings
Due to an increasingly aging population and long-term care available, the number of older adults seeking long-term care facilities is growing. Resident satisfaction indicators have...
Maximizing coverage, reducing time: a usability evaluation method for web-based library systems
Maximizing coverage, reducing time: a usability evaluation method for web-based library systems
AbstractThe usability of a Web Based Library System (WBLS) is an important quality attribute that must be met in order for the intended users to be satisfied. These usability quali...
Informatizzazione di un Servizio di Neuroradiologia
Informatizzazione di un Servizio di Neuroradiologia
Presso il Servizio di Neuroradiologia dell'Ospedale Bellaria è stato implementato ed avviato un sistema RIS/PACS per la archiviazione e gestione dei dati anagrafici dei pazienti, d...
"Best Tradition": CREATE, JCSEE and the Program Evaluation Standards
"Best Tradition": CREATE, JCSEE and the Program Evaluation Standards
Background: Evaluation “is a task in the best tradition of the most abstract theoretical science as well as the most practical applied science” (Scriven, 1968, p .9). The Program E...
Maximizing Coverage, Reducing Time: A Usability Evaluation Method for Web-Based Library Systems
Maximizing Coverage, Reducing Time: A Usability Evaluation Method for Web-Based Library Systems
Abstract
Usability of a Web Based Library Systems (WBLS) is a major quality attribute. Checklists have become common and easy method to evaluate the usability of these WBLS...
Desafios na implementação de um checklist em unidade de terapia intensiva neonatal e pediátrica
Desafios na implementação de um checklist em unidade de terapia intensiva neonatal e pediátrica
As Infecções Relacionadas à Assistência à Saúde (IRAS) são graves ameaças à segurança do paciente que aumentam a mortalidade e os custos hospitalares. Dentre os instrumentos recome...

