Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Social Welfare in China
View through CrossRef
The study of social welfare in China has expanded enormously in the three decades since “reform and opening” started a series of social and economic processes that have transformed the provision of social goods for China’s population. In China this work touches on a number of interrelated policy areas, including social security (社会保障), social insurance (社会保险), social welfare (社会福利), and social assistance (社会救济), which cover everything from pensions and workplace injury insurance to minimum income guarantees and health provision. Research has broadly served two purposes. First, it provides information describing what has been a rapidly changing set of extremely complex policy areas. Second, it has increasingly sought to go beyond just describing policy and prescribing changes in order to explain why and how developments turned out as they did. At the same time, work on social welfare has taken advantage of increasing amounts of information being made available, opportunities emerging to conduct various types of fieldwork and data gathering, and increased interaction between Chinese scholars and their colleagues around the world. This means that the study of social welfare is now methodologically diverse, building theoretical contributions and engaging with international examples and comparative studies. In the English-language literature, examples are found of collaboration as well as individual contributions from Chinese scholars and scholars from outside China. Studies of social welfare have left behind the broadly descriptive questions of what and when, although there is still a need to update our foundational knowledge and understanding of developments in China. Researchers have now been able to focus more on questions of where, how, why, and who. These more critical studies of social welfare in China both challenge our existing understanding of developments and have helped to begin a more nuanced discussion of what the outcomes and implications of social welfare policy have been and will be in a country as populous and diverse as China. The study of social welfare in China is the provision of both a narrative and explanation of change that affects millions of people. Studies of the period before the 1980s are still uncovering and explaining the overwhelming diversity of what can be understood as social welfare in China, as well as the notable policy continuities that are still felt today. Scholarship addressing developments since reform and opening started has dealt with what has been a broadly pessimistic series of developments where the tendency has been to view the Chinese state as reacting, sometimes very slowly or ineffectively, to the collapse of traditional forms of welfare brought about by the consequences of economic change. This is not to say that the state has not been trying to deal with these challenges, and a great deal of the recent scholarship has addressed the question of how much the state intended certain outcomes, while also teasing out the process of policy change. In wrestling with these extensive changes, the study of social welfare has produced a diverse literature that not only adds to our understanding of particular policy areas, but also of the overall transformation of China over the last hundred years.
Title: Social Welfare in China
Description:
The study of social welfare in China has expanded enormously in the three decades since “reform and opening” started a series of social and economic processes that have transformed the provision of social goods for China’s population.
In China this work touches on a number of interrelated policy areas, including social security (社会保障), social insurance (社会保险), social welfare (社会福利), and social assistance (社会救济), which cover everything from pensions and workplace injury insurance to minimum income guarantees and health provision.
Research has broadly served two purposes.
First, it provides information describing what has been a rapidly changing set of extremely complex policy areas.
Second, it has increasingly sought to go beyond just describing policy and prescribing changes in order to explain why and how developments turned out as they did.
At the same time, work on social welfare has taken advantage of increasing amounts of information being made available, opportunities emerging to conduct various types of fieldwork and data gathering, and increased interaction between Chinese scholars and their colleagues around the world.
This means that the study of social welfare is now methodologically diverse, building theoretical contributions and engaging with international examples and comparative studies.
In the English-language literature, examples are found of collaboration as well as individual contributions from Chinese scholars and scholars from outside China.
Studies of social welfare have left behind the broadly descriptive questions of what and when, although there is still a need to update our foundational knowledge and understanding of developments in China.
Researchers have now been able to focus more on questions of where, how, why, and who.
These more critical studies of social welfare in China both challenge our existing understanding of developments and have helped to begin a more nuanced discussion of what the outcomes and implications of social welfare policy have been and will be in a country as populous and diverse as China.
The study of social welfare in China is the provision of both a narrative and explanation of change that affects millions of people.
Studies of the period before the 1980s are still uncovering and explaining the overwhelming diversity of what can be understood as social welfare in China, as well as the notable policy continuities that are still felt today.
Scholarship addressing developments since reform and opening started has dealt with what has been a broadly pessimistic series of developments where the tendency has been to view the Chinese state as reacting, sometimes very slowly or ineffectively, to the collapse of traditional forms of welfare brought about by the consequences of economic change.
This is not to say that the state has not been trying to deal with these challenges, and a great deal of the recent scholarship has addressed the question of how much the state intended certain outcomes, while also teasing out the process of policy change.
In wrestling with these extensive changes, the study of social welfare has produced a diverse literature that not only adds to our understanding of particular policy areas, but also of the overall transformation of China over the last hundred years.
Related Results
Welfare, Race, and the American Imagination
Welfare, Race, and the American Imagination
This entry includes a variety of sources on American beliefs about welfare and race. There is a much larger literature on poverty and race not included here, including the importan...
International Social Welfare
International Social Welfare
There has been a rapid expansion of interest in international social welfare in recent years. Previously, the study of social welfare was focused on domestic issues and relatively ...
Rural Social Work in China
Rural Social Work in China
In this article, “China” refers to “mainland China.” Social work as academic discipline was first introduced to China’s most important universities, such as Yenching University, in...
Equestrian: Horse sport development and cooperation between horses and humans
Equestrian: Horse sport development and cooperation between horses and humans
One of the most important industries in China’s history has been the horse industry, and the modern horse industry is still in the process of being transformed. When the horse busi...
Animal welfare in Europe and Iran: policy perspective and society
Animal welfare in Europe and Iran: policy perspective and society
Intensive animal production systems are compromising current animal welfare standards. Societies' growing concerns regarding how animals are raised have resulted in continuous poli...
Conditions of Sustainable Welfare: A Cross-Case Empirical Analysis of 22 Locality-Based Welfare Systems in Decentralised Indonesia
Conditions of Sustainable Welfare: A Cross-Case Empirical Analysis of 22 Locality-Based Welfare Systems in Decentralised Indonesia
The existing body of knowledge underpinning welfare state theory suggests that most welfare systems depend on growth. It signifies that the state–market mechanism is a prerequisite...
Prioritization the Factors Affecting the future of Employment and Social Welfare in Iran
Prioritization the Factors Affecting the future of Employment and Social Welfare in Iran
Introduction: One of the basic goals of development is to achieve universal social welfare and the existence of social welfare in any society is considered as one of the most impor...
Current Situation, Existing Problems and Prospect of the Study of Social Stratification in Contemporary China
Current Situation, Existing Problems and Prospect of the Study of Social Stratification in Contemporary China
Introduction. Under the backdrop of market economy and social transformation in China, the class structure of society has undergone profound changes, and the traditional class d...


