Javascript must be enabled to continue!
European policies for public health in border regions: no European mindset as yet
View through CrossRef
AbstractBackgroundThe sudden emergence of COVID-19 in 2020 demonstrated that Europe was not prepared for a public health crisis like this pandemic. In the European Union, matters of health have remained primarily under the jurisdiction of individual Member States. However, certain events, such as the Kohll-Decker ruling on free mobility of health services and the COVID-19 pandemic, compelled the EU to address health matters in border regions. This study examines how EU policies address public health in border regions. To that end, we have drawn from border studies, a field that provides insight into the fluidity and complexity of borders in everyday life. Besides that we used constructivist policy studies as a lens for the analysis of EU policy documents.MethodsA policy discourse analysis was conducted to explore how European policy addresses the development of a transnational, European public health in border regions. Key European policy documents published between 2002 and 2027 were analysed to understand how policies are constructed and problems are framed. The analysis was guided by research questions and the theoretical approach.ResultsThe analysis reveals that, while having limited competences in the field of health care, the EU is slowly developing a rationale and a knowledge base to increase its competences in health care. It also shows that in the field of public health, the EU argues for addressing health determinants and promoting healthy lifestyles, though it does not address health promotion in border regions. The EU’s authority in public health in border regions revolves primarily around addressing physical, biological and chemical threats rather than social health problems.ConclusionThough the EU has carefully developed a transnational perspective on health care, the EU has not developed any authority with respect to transnational public health. Though public health and health promotion in border regions have been confronted with specific challenges, neither specific Member States nor the EU have a transnational collaborative perspective that does justice to the characteristics of border regions. When it comes to public health in border regions, there is no European mindset as yet.
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Title: European policies for public health in border regions: no European mindset as yet
Description:
AbstractBackgroundThe sudden emergence of COVID-19 in 2020 demonstrated that Europe was not prepared for a public health crisis like this pandemic.
In the European Union, matters of health have remained primarily under the jurisdiction of individual Member States.
However, certain events, such as the Kohll-Decker ruling on free mobility of health services and the COVID-19 pandemic, compelled the EU to address health matters in border regions.
This study examines how EU policies address public health in border regions.
To that end, we have drawn from border studies, a field that provides insight into the fluidity and complexity of borders in everyday life.
Besides that we used constructivist policy studies as a lens for the analysis of EU policy documents.
MethodsA policy discourse analysis was conducted to explore how European policy addresses the development of a transnational, European public health in border regions.
Key European policy documents published between 2002 and 2027 were analysed to understand how policies are constructed and problems are framed.
The analysis was guided by research questions and the theoretical approach.
ResultsThe analysis reveals that, while having limited competences in the field of health care, the EU is slowly developing a rationale and a knowledge base to increase its competences in health care.
It also shows that in the field of public health, the EU argues for addressing health determinants and promoting healthy lifestyles, though it does not address health promotion in border regions.
The EU’s authority in public health in border regions revolves primarily around addressing physical, biological and chemical threats rather than social health problems.
ConclusionThough the EU has carefully developed a transnational perspective on health care, the EU has not developed any authority with respect to transnational public health.
Though public health and health promotion in border regions have been confronted with specific challenges, neither specific Member States nor the EU have a transnational collaborative perspective that does justice to the characteristics of border regions.
When it comes to public health in border regions, there is no European mindset as yet.
Related Results
A Comprehensive Investigation Into The Effects of Mindset
A Comprehensive Investigation Into The Effects of Mindset
Why do some adolescents struggle more with academic setbacks and challenges than others? Professor Carol Dweck’s research highlights the importance of mindset—beliefs about one’s a...
8.C. Workshop: Networking for life: How European regions develop/strengthen cross-border health
8.C. Workshop: Networking for life: How European regions develop/strengthen cross-border health
Abstract
The WHO European Programme of Work (2020-2025) emphasizes the importance of “supporting local living environments tha...
The nexus between territorial border controls, informal cross border trading and economic security in Zimbabwe: the case of Beitbridge Border Post
The nexus between territorial border controls, informal cross border trading and economic security in Zimbabwe: the case of Beitbridge Border Post
Informal cross border trade is central to the lives of many Zimbabweans, with informal trade across the Zimbabwean-South African border being of particular importance. This entails...
Workshop: Everything you always wanted to know about EU health policy but were afraid to ask
Workshop: Everything you always wanted to know about EU health policy but were afraid to ask
Abstract
Objective
The EU is often criticized for being ‘market-driven’ and practicing a form of ‘cold integration’. Any attempt...
Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Border Policies in Dehong Prefecture of Yunnan, China
Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Border Policies in Dehong Prefecture of Yunnan, China
With the process of globalization, many political geographers and research institutions have begun to focus on borders and border areas. Faced with the current debate on the border...
Features of legal differentiation of the border sphere in Ukraine
Features of legal differentiation of the border sphere in Ukraine
This scientific article is dedicated to the peculiarities of legal differentiation in the border sphere in Ukraine. The article examines legislative and regulatory acts that have r...
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The UP Manila Health Policy Development Hub recognizes the invaluable contribution of the participants in theseries of roundtable discussions listed below:
RTD: Beyond Hospit...
ANALYSIS OF HEALTH POLICY IN THE BORDER AREA OF WEST KALIMANTAN INDONESIA
ANALYSIS OF HEALTH POLICY IN THE BORDER AREA OF WEST KALIMANTAN INDONESIA
Background : The health status of the people in the border areas with low economic level, especially in rural areas, have not received equitable health services optimally due to ge...

