Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Removal of arsenic and iron removal from drinking water using coagulation and biological treatment
View through CrossRef
Effects of biological activated carbon (BAC), biological aerated filter (BAF), alum coagulation and Moringa oleifera coagulation were investigated to remove iron and arsenic contaminants from drinking water. At an initial dose of 5 mg/L, the removal efficiency for arsenic and iron was 63% and 58% respectively using alum, and 47% and 41% respectively using Moringa oleifera. The removal of both contaminants increased with the increase in coagulant dose and decrease in pH. Biological processes were more effective in removing these contaminants than coagulation. Compared to BAF, BAC gave greater removal of both arsenic and iron, removing 85% and 74%, respectively. Longer contact time for both processes could reduce the greater concentration of arsenic and iron contaminants. The addition of coagulation (at 5 mg/L dosage) and a biological process (with 15 or 60 min contact time) could significantly increase removal efficiency, and the maximum removal was observed for the combination of alum and BAC treatment (60 min contact time), with 100% and 98.56% for arsenic and iron respectively. The reduction efficiency of arsenic and iron reduced with the increase in the concentration of dissolved organics in the feedwater due to the adsorption competition between organic molecules and heavy metals.
Title: Removal of arsenic and iron removal from drinking water using coagulation and biological treatment
Description:
Effects of biological activated carbon (BAC), biological aerated filter (BAF), alum coagulation and Moringa oleifera coagulation were investigated to remove iron and arsenic contaminants from drinking water.
At an initial dose of 5 mg/L, the removal efficiency for arsenic and iron was 63% and 58% respectively using alum, and 47% and 41% respectively using Moringa oleifera.
The removal of both contaminants increased with the increase in coagulant dose and decrease in pH.
Biological processes were more effective in removing these contaminants than coagulation.
Compared to BAF, BAC gave greater removal of both arsenic and iron, removing 85% and 74%, respectively.
Longer contact time for both processes could reduce the greater concentration of arsenic and iron contaminants.
The addition of coagulation (at 5 mg/L dosage) and a biological process (with 15 or 60 min contact time) could significantly increase removal efficiency, and the maximum removal was observed for the combination of alum and BAC treatment (60 min contact time), with 100% and 98.
56% for arsenic and iron respectively.
The reduction efficiency of arsenic and iron reduced with the increase in the concentration of dissolved organics in the feedwater due to the adsorption competition between organic molecules and heavy metals.
Related Results
Hydatid Disease of The Brain Parenchyma: A Systematic Review
Hydatid Disease of The Brain Parenchyma: A Systematic Review
Abstarct
Introduction
Isolated brain hydatid disease (BHD) is an extremely rare form of echinococcosis. A prompt and timely diagnosis is a crucial step in disease management. This ...
The Arsenic Concentration in Saliva, Urine and Drinking Water in Endemic Arsenicosis Area in Shanyin County of Shanxi Province, China
The Arsenic Concentration in Saliva, Urine and Drinking Water in Endemic Arsenicosis Area in Shanyin County of Shanxi Province, China
Biological monitoring for arsenic(As) is usually based upon a determination of urine, blood, nail and hair arsenic concentration, however, saliva has been suggested as a non-invasi...
Phytoremediation Potential of <em>Ceratophyllum</em> sp. on Arsenic-Contaminated Conditions
Phytoremediation Potential of <em>Ceratophyllum</em> sp. on Arsenic-Contaminated Conditions
Purpose: Aquatic contamination with arsenic is a serious problem as people will be at risk of arsenic toxicity when using and drinking contaminated water. Phytoremediation is a pos...
Removal of Arsenic - “A Silent Killer” in the Environment by Adsorption Methods
Removal of Arsenic - “A Silent Killer” in the Environment by Adsorption Methods
Water is one of the most essential requirements for living being to survive because 70–80% of the mass of most living bodies consists of water and various mineral and organic salts...
Use of Formation Water and Associated Gases and their Simultaneous Utilization for Obtaining Microelement Concentrates Fresh Water and Drinking Water
Use of Formation Water and Associated Gases and their Simultaneous Utilization for Obtaining Microelement Concentrates Fresh Water and Drinking Water
Abstract Purpose: The invention relates to the oil industry, inorganic chemistry, in particular, to the methods of complex processing of formation water, using flare gas of oil and...
Gut Microbiome and Health Assessment Due To Arsenic Toxicity: A Review
Gut Microbiome and Health Assessment Due To Arsenic Toxicity: A Review
Arsenic is considered as a class 1 carcinogen and first among toxicants ranked by the Environmental Protection Agency. Arsenic toxicity includes deleterious effect on gut microb...
Arsenic Speciation Techniques in Soil Water and Plant: An Overview
Arsenic Speciation Techniques in Soil Water and Plant: An Overview
There are more than 100 different arsenic with different characteristics in the soil-water-plant ecosystem. The identification and quantification of individual arsenic species is e...
Arsenic Induced Breast Cancer Risk in Population of Bihar, India
Arsenic Induced Breast Cancer Risk in Population of Bihar, India
Abstract
Globally, ~ 300 million people are exposed to arsenic poisoning while in India an estimated 70 million people are affected by consumption of arsenic contaminated w...

