Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

A Double‐Blind Comparative Study of burstDR Versus Tonic Epidural Motor Cortex Stimulation for the Treatment of Intractable Neuropathic Pain

View through CrossRef
ABSTRACTBackgroundPreliminary studies on epidural motor cortex stimulation (eMCS) for the treatment of drug‐resistant neuropathic pain have supported the extension to novel stimulation waveforms, in particular burstDR. However, only a low level of evidence is available. The aim of this retrospective observational study was to compare the analgesic efficacy of burstDR versus tonic eMCS.MethodsPatients suffering from unilateral, drug‐resistant neuropathic pain were selected for eMCS. During the trial phase, burstDR and tonic waveforms were successively applied for three consecutive months in a double‐blinded fashion and in a random order. The primary outcome criterion was the percentage of pain relief (%PR) at 3 and 6 months. The secondary outcome criterion was the proportion of patients reporting a superior %PR with the burstDR waveform.ResultsThirteen patients were included. The averaged %PR was 75.4% ± 18.6% after burstDR eMCS and 61.1% ± 28.6% after tonic eMCS (p = 0.21). Nine patients preferred the burstDR waveform for chronic eMCS (p = 0.16), and six of them were able to decrease or withdraw their analgesic drug intake. No adverse side effect was encountered in relation to burstDR eMCS.ConclusionsBurstDR eMCS seems at least as effective as tonic eMCS for the treatment of drug‐resistant neuropathic pain and shows a similar safety profile. Although the precise mechanisms of action remain to be fully elucidated, adequate matching between the oscillatory rhythm in the motor cortex and that of the burstDR waveform may increase synaptic efficacy, thus enhancing the functional connectivity of the motor cortex with remote brain networks involved in pain modulation.Significance StatementIn the present paper, we provide for the first time a double‐blinded study comparing burstDR versus tonic eMCS for the treatment of intractable, drug‐resistant neuropathic pain. Our results show that burstDR eMCS is a promising option in a population of patients especially difficult to treat, and support the ongoing move toward new stimulation waveforms able to more efficiently activate the brain networks involved in pain modulation.
Title: A Double‐Blind Comparative Study of burstDR Versus Tonic Epidural Motor Cortex Stimulation for the Treatment of Intractable Neuropathic Pain
Description:
ABSTRACTBackgroundPreliminary studies on epidural motor cortex stimulation (eMCS) for the treatment of drug‐resistant neuropathic pain have supported the extension to novel stimulation waveforms, in particular burstDR.
However, only a low level of evidence is available.
The aim of this retrospective observational study was to compare the analgesic efficacy of burstDR versus tonic eMCS.
MethodsPatients suffering from unilateral, drug‐resistant neuropathic pain were selected for eMCS.
During the trial phase, burstDR and tonic waveforms were successively applied for three consecutive months in a double‐blinded fashion and in a random order.
The primary outcome criterion was the percentage of pain relief (%PR) at 3 and 6 months.
The secondary outcome criterion was the proportion of patients reporting a superior %PR with the burstDR waveform.
ResultsThirteen patients were included.
The averaged %PR was 75.
4% ± 18.
6% after burstDR eMCS and 61.
1% ± 28.
6% after tonic eMCS (p = 0.
21).
Nine patients preferred the burstDR waveform for chronic eMCS (p = 0.
16), and six of them were able to decrease or withdraw their analgesic drug intake.
No adverse side effect was encountered in relation to burstDR eMCS.
ConclusionsBurstDR eMCS seems at least as effective as tonic eMCS for the treatment of drug‐resistant neuropathic pain and shows a similar safety profile.
Although the precise mechanisms of action remain to be fully elucidated, adequate matching between the oscillatory rhythm in the motor cortex and that of the burstDR waveform may increase synaptic efficacy, thus enhancing the functional connectivity of the motor cortex with remote brain networks involved in pain modulation.
Significance StatementIn the present paper, we provide for the first time a double‐blinded study comparing burstDR versus tonic eMCS for the treatment of intractable, drug‐resistant neuropathic pain.
Our results show that burstDR eMCS is a promising option in a population of patients especially difficult to treat, and support the ongoing move toward new stimulation waveforms able to more efficiently activate the brain networks involved in pain modulation.

Related Results

Differential Diagnosis of Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A Review
Differential Diagnosis of Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A Review
Abstract Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is a complex and often overlooked condition caused by the compression of neurovascular structures as they pass through the thoracic outlet. ...
Patient Decision Making Surrounding Epidural Use in Labor
Patient Decision Making Surrounding Epidural Use in Labor
Introduction/Objectives: Labor is thought to be one of the most painful experiences in a woman’s life, similar to pain caused by complex regional pain syndromes. Epidural analgesia...
Types of Chronic Pain After Total Knee Arthroplasty and Their Relationship with Pain Intensity, Disability, and Quality of Life
Types of Chronic Pain After Total Knee Arthroplasty and Their Relationship with Pain Intensity, Disability, and Quality of Life
OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of different pain mechanisms, including nociplastic pain, and to evaluate the associations of these mechanisms with pain intensity, disabilit...
Primerjalna književnost na prelomu tisočletja
Primerjalna književnost na prelomu tisočletja
In a comprehensive and at times critical manner, this volume seeks to shed light on the development of events in Western (i.e., European and North American) comparative literature ...
NLRP3 inflammasome: a key driver of neuroinflammation and a novel therapeutic target for neuropathic pain
NLRP3 inflammasome: a key driver of neuroinflammation and a novel therapeutic target for neuropathic pain
Neuropathic pain represents a serious complication arising from a spectrum of disorders that precipitate lesions within the central and peripheral nervous systems. This disabling p...
A Chinese Guideline for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Neuropathic Pain
A Chinese Guideline for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Neuropathic Pain
<i>Background</i>: Neuropathic pain refers to pain caused by injury or disease affecting the somatosensory nervous system, which is a common and frequen...

Back to Top