Javascript must be enabled to continue!
OUTCOME OF OPEN REPAIR VERSUS LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY IN PATIENTS WITH DUODENAL ULCER PERFORATION
View through CrossRef
Background: Duodenal ulcer perforation is a life-threatening surgical emergency. With the advancement of minimally invasive techniques, laparoscopic repair has emerged as an alternative to conventional open surgery. However, comparative data on postoperative outcomes remains limited, especially in local contexts.
Objective: To compare postoperative pain between laparoscopic and open surgical repair in patients with duodenal ulcer perforation.
Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted at the Department of Surgery, Saidu Group of Teaching Hospital, Swat, over six months. Sixty patients with CT-confirmed duodenal ulcer perforation were enrolled and randomly assigned to laparoscopic (n=30) or open repair (n=30). Postoperative pain was assessed on postoperative day 3 using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Opioid consumption and time to return to normal activity were also recorded. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS version 21. An independent sample t-test was used with a significance level of p<0.05.
Results: The mean VAS pain score was significantly lower in the laparoscopic group (4.5 ± 0.7) than in the open group (6.7 ± 0.8; p<0.001). Opioid requirement in the first 24 hours was also significantly reduced in the laparoscopic group (40 ± 14 mg vs. 60 ± 12 mg; p=0.002). Return to normal activity was faster in the laparoscopic group (14 ± 2 days) compared to the open group (21 ± 4 days; p<0.001). Although operative time was longer in the laparoscopic group (140 ± 18 minutes vs. 110 ± 15 minutes), this did not affect clinical outcomes.
Conclusion: Laparoscopic repair of duodenal ulcer perforation is associated with significantly lower postoperative pain, reduced analgesic needs, and faster recovery than open repair, despite a longer operative time. These findings support the broader adoption of laparoscopic techniques in suitable patients, with the caveat of a small sample size and need for further large-scale trials.
Title: OUTCOME OF OPEN REPAIR VERSUS LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY IN PATIENTS WITH DUODENAL ULCER PERFORATION
Description:
Background: Duodenal ulcer perforation is a life-threatening surgical emergency.
With the advancement of minimally invasive techniques, laparoscopic repair has emerged as an alternative to conventional open surgery.
However, comparative data on postoperative outcomes remains limited, especially in local contexts.
Objective: To compare postoperative pain between laparoscopic and open surgical repair in patients with duodenal ulcer perforation.
Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted at the Department of Surgery, Saidu Group of Teaching Hospital, Swat, over six months.
Sixty patients with CT-confirmed duodenal ulcer perforation were enrolled and randomly assigned to laparoscopic (n=30) or open repair (n=30).
Postoperative pain was assessed on postoperative day 3 using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS).
Opioid consumption and time to return to normal activity were also recorded.
Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS version 21.
An independent sample t-test was used with a significance level of p<0.
05.
Results: The mean VAS pain score was significantly lower in the laparoscopic group (4.
5 ± 0.
7) than in the open group (6.
7 ± 0.
8; p<0.
001).
Opioid requirement in the first 24 hours was also significantly reduced in the laparoscopic group (40 ± 14 mg vs.
60 ± 12 mg; p=0.
002).
Return to normal activity was faster in the laparoscopic group (14 ± 2 days) compared to the open group (21 ± 4 days; p<0.
001).
Although operative time was longer in the laparoscopic group (140 ± 18 minutes vs.
110 ± 15 minutes), this did not affect clinical outcomes.
Conclusion: Laparoscopic repair of duodenal ulcer perforation is associated with significantly lower postoperative pain, reduced analgesic needs, and faster recovery than open repair, despite a longer operative time.
These findings support the broader adoption of laparoscopic techniques in suitable patients, with the caveat of a small sample size and need for further large-scale trials.
Related Results
Modified Graham’s repair for peptic ulcer perforation: reassessment study
Modified Graham’s repair for peptic ulcer perforation: reassessment study
Background: Peptic perforation is an emergency and requires urgent surgical treatment. Many modalities of treatment are available ranging from conservative treatment to laparoscopi...
Frequency of Surgical Site Infection (SSI) between laparoscopic graham's omentopexy and open graham's omentopexy after duodenal ulcer perforation.
Frequency of Surgical Site Infection (SSI) between laparoscopic graham's omentopexy and open graham's omentopexy after duodenal ulcer perforation.
Objective: To compare frequency of surgical site infection between laparoscopic Graham's omentopexy and open Graham's omentopexy after duodenal ulcer perforation. Study Design: Ran...
Duodenojejunostomy, an Old Technique but Novel Solution for Giant Duodenal Perforations - A Report of Four Cases and Review of Literature
Duodenojejunostomy, an Old Technique but Novel Solution for Giant Duodenal Perforations - A Report of Four Cases and Review of Literature
Background: Despite advances in the medical management of peptic ulcer disease, duodenal ulcer (DU)
perforation remains a common surgical emergency. Most DU perforations are small ...
What Role Does a Colored Under Glove Have in Detecting Glove Perforation in Foot and Ankle Procedures?
What Role Does a Colored Under Glove Have in Detecting Glove Perforation in Foot and Ankle Procedures?
Abstract
Background
Many orthopaedic surgical teams practice double gloving or use colored indicator gloving techniques to reduce contamination i...
Study on the characteristics of microcirculation in the site of pressure ulcer in patients with spinal cord injury
Study on the characteristics of microcirculation in the site of pressure ulcer in patients with spinal cord injury
To investigate the characteristics of pressure ulcer microcirculation in SCI patients with pressure ulcer, and to provide evidence for the treatment of pressure ulcer in patients w...
Nurses’ Knowledge and Practice on Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management for Hospitalized Patients at Tertiary Level Hospital
Nurses’ Knowledge and Practice on Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management for Hospitalized Patients at Tertiary Level Hospital
Background: Pressure ulcers are areas of localized injury to the skin, underlying tissue or both, usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure or in combination with she...
Revascularization in diabetic foot ulcer and outcome
Revascularization in diabetic foot ulcer and outcome
Background & objective: Diabetes is a major public health problem regionally and globally. The prevalence of diabetes and pre-diabetes in general population of Bangladesh is hi...
Diabetic Foot in Qatar: A Primary Care Perspective
Diabetic Foot in Qatar: A Primary Care Perspective
Diabetic Foot in QatarA primary care Perspective Introduction Diabetes represents a major public health burden in developing countries, especially the Arabian Gulf region, which is...

