Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Voorlopige catalogus
View through CrossRef
AbstractA painting of a pastoral couple making music was sold at an auction in 1975 under the name of Abraham Bloemaert. The unsigned work should however be attributed to Aelbert Jansz. van dcr Schoor. Active in Utrecht, this painter specialized in portraits, figures, fish still lifes and Vanitas pieces. Although nothing is known of his early years or tuition, he was undoubtedly trained as a painter in Utrecht, possibly under Abraham Bloemaert, with whose work his own has much in common. His earliest dated paintings were done in the early 1640s. Most of them arc portraits, although a few interiors of this period are also known. As a genre and history painter Van der Schoor was much inspired by Jan van Bijlert and slightly less by Gerard van Honthorst, as well as by Abraham Bloemaert. His pictures, usually of musicians, but also the occasional history piece, such as Christ at Evimaus, are characterized by a clear and vivid use of colour, the monumental, plastic figures and the recurring, distinctive types of figure. Van der Schoor's portraits have a very sober, somewhat old-fashioned air. Here, too, he was influenced by better-known Utrecht painters like Jan van Bijlert and Hendrick Bloemaert. No stylistic development can be observed in his corpus of portraits, but this is perhaps because he was only active as a portraitist for a very brief period. He is unlikely to have painted any portraits after 1651. Instead, he concentrated on fish still lifes and Vanitas representations. He did however continue to paint figure pieces. Not surprisingly, Aelbert van der Schoor modelled his fish still lifes on examples by fellow-painters in Utrecht, Jan de Bont and Willem Ormea, for instance. His few surviving Vanitas pieces are more original, the undeniable highlight of this genre being the Vanitas in the Rijksmuseum, in which a skull is painted from six different angles. Aelbert van der Schoor's oeuvre currently comprises thirty paintings, but his output was surely larger. The fact that some of the paintings presently attributed to him were previously regarded as the work of Theodor Rombouts, Dirck van Baburen, Abraham Bloemaert or Jan Gerritz van Bronchorst, suggests that fresh additions will be made to his oeuvre within due course. The same must certainly apply to his drawings. Hitherto only one has been attributed to him, a sheet of figure studies drawn in preparation for the aforementioned pastoral couple. It demonstrates that in conceiving this very early painting Aelbert van der Schoor employed the method of the nestor of Utrecht painting, Abraham Bloemaert. It would therefore not come as a surprise if we should learn that Bloemaert was Aelbert van der Schoor's teacher.
Title: Voorlopige catalogus
Description:
AbstractA painting of a pastoral couple making music was sold at an auction in 1975 under the name of Abraham Bloemaert.
The unsigned work should however be attributed to Aelbert Jansz.
van dcr Schoor.
Active in Utrecht, this painter specialized in portraits, figures, fish still lifes and Vanitas pieces.
Although nothing is known of his early years or tuition, he was undoubtedly trained as a painter in Utrecht, possibly under Abraham Bloemaert, with whose work his own has much in common.
His earliest dated paintings were done in the early 1640s.
Most of them arc portraits, although a few interiors of this period are also known.
As a genre and history painter Van der Schoor was much inspired by Jan van Bijlert and slightly less by Gerard van Honthorst, as well as by Abraham Bloemaert.
His pictures, usually of musicians, but also the occasional history piece, such as Christ at Evimaus, are characterized by a clear and vivid use of colour, the monumental, plastic figures and the recurring, distinctive types of figure.
Van der Schoor's portraits have a very sober, somewhat old-fashioned air.
Here, too, he was influenced by better-known Utrecht painters like Jan van Bijlert and Hendrick Bloemaert.
No stylistic development can be observed in his corpus of portraits, but this is perhaps because he was only active as a portraitist for a very brief period.
He is unlikely to have painted any portraits after 1651.
Instead, he concentrated on fish still lifes and Vanitas representations.
He did however continue to paint figure pieces.
Not surprisingly, Aelbert van der Schoor modelled his fish still lifes on examples by fellow-painters in Utrecht, Jan de Bont and Willem Ormea, for instance.
His few surviving Vanitas pieces are more original, the undeniable highlight of this genre being the Vanitas in the Rijksmuseum, in which a skull is painted from six different angles.
Aelbert van der Schoor's oeuvre currently comprises thirty paintings, but his output was surely larger.
The fact that some of the paintings presently attributed to him were previously regarded as the work of Theodor Rombouts, Dirck van Baburen, Abraham Bloemaert or Jan Gerritz van Bronchorst, suggests that fresh additions will be made to his oeuvre within due course.
The same must certainly apply to his drawings.
Hitherto only one has been attributed to him, a sheet of figure studies drawn in preparation for the aforementioned pastoral couple.
It demonstrates that in conceiving this very early painting Aelbert van der Schoor employed the method of the nestor of Utrecht painting, Abraham Bloemaert.
It would therefore not come as a surprise if we should learn that Bloemaert was Aelbert van der Schoor's teacher.
Related Results
Using John Nidd's annotated books in the Wren Library to reassess his contribution to John Ray's Catalogus (1660)
Using John Nidd's annotated books in the Wren Library to reassess his contribution to John Ray's Catalogus (1660)
In his Catalogus plantarum circa Cantabrigiam nascentium (1660), John Ray acknowledged the help of his senior colleague at Trinity College, John Nidd, to whom he said the reader wa...
Voorlopige catalogus van de schilderijen van Pieter Veen
Voorlopige catalogus van de schilderijen van Pieter Veen
AbstractPieter Veen's name is virtually unmentioned in art-historical sources. Moreover, many of his paintings, some of them bearing false signatures, were sold under other names, ...
75 jaar van Tydskrif vir Letterkunde – ’n voorlopige verkenning
75 jaar van Tydskrif vir Letterkunde – ’n voorlopige verkenning
Tydskrif vir Letterkunde was founded in 1936 as the Jaarboek van die Afrikaanse Skrywerskring (Yearbook of the Afrikaans Writers’ Circle). This article explores the history of the ...
The catalogue of Gniezno’s Archbishops
The catalogue of Gniezno’s Archbishops
Manuscript of "Catalogus archiepiscoporum Gnesnensium" was written in 1531 on the order of Cracow Bishop and Deputy Chancellor of the Crown, Piotr Tomicki. It is a copy of the manu...
Het aardewerk van de pottenbakkerij Dupont te Poperinge.
Het aardewerk van de pottenbakkerij Dupont te Poperinge.
Benoit Dupont werd in 1846 pottenbakker te Poperinge door een oud bedrijf over te nemen waarvan de activiteit terugging tot in de 14e eeuw. Zijn nakomelingen Dupont en Ver Elst zet...
XVII.—Letters from Sir Henry Wotton to King James I. and others.—Communicated by C. Knight Watson, Esq. M.A. Secretary, in a Letter to A. W. Franks, Esq. Director
XVII.—Letters from Sir Henry Wotton to King James I. and others.—Communicated by C. Knight Watson, Esq. M.A. Secretary, in a Letter to A. W. Franks, Esq. Director
The following Letters need but little introduction on my part. They may be left to tell their own story, and may be useful to illustrate or to correct the history of the period to ...

