Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Formation Evaluation Of Exploration Coalbed Methane Wells
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Sound development decisions for coalbed methane reservoirs, require accurate determination of gas in-place and natural fracture permeability. The purpose of this paper is to outline procedures to evaluate reservoir properties required for prediction of well deliverability. The steps are documented with data and analyses from San Juan Basin Fruitland Formation coalbed methane development projects. The procedures are applicable to other sedimentary basins.
The first step in the evaluation program is to review available well and geologic data to select well locations and to design data collection programs. These data include structure and stratigraphic maps, drilling records, logs, well tests, production records, gas content information, and fracture studies.
The next step in the evaluation is to collect gas content and permeability data from the first well or wells drilled. Gas content is quantified with conventional core, pressure core, sidewall core, and drill cutting samples. An example of the accuracy of gas content determinations from these sources is discussed. The permeability of the fracture system is quantified with drill stem tests. Testing procedures will be presented. Following testing, open hole logging is performed. Specifications for complete log suites are included.
Once the well site operations are concluded, it is necessary to determine the coal gas storage capacity and the properties of the coal and non-coal rocks from core analyses. Natural fracture geometry is further quantified. Well log analysis techniques are developed. The core analyses, log analysis techniques, and the accuracy thereof will be documented.
The final step in the evaluation is to combine all of the above data and analyses to predict gas and water deliverability. The methodology utilizes reservoir simulation which will be briefly discussed.
Introduction
The purpose of this paper is to present examples of the methodology required to evaluate the properties of coalbed methane reservoirs for deliverability prediction. In order to make informed decisions concerning the economic viability of coalbed methane reservoir development, it is necessary to make accurate projections of fluid production rates over the life of the project. As a simplified summary, accurate projections require estimates of the following reservoir properties which are components of Darcy's and Fide's Laws.
Reservoir Geometry
Fluid Volumes in Place
Fluid Properties Affecting Fluid Flow
Rock Properties Affecting Fluid Flow
The purpose of the first exploratory wells drilled into a reservoir is to collect as much of this information as possible. Reservoir geometry estimates are most accurately determined by structural and stratigraphic mapping. The fluid volumes in-place must be quantified with core and fluid samples with appropriate analyses. The vast majority of the gas volume in-place is adsorbed in coal matrices. Estimates of this volume require that coal samples be placed in desorption canisters immediately upon retrieval to surface, and that the volume of gas desorbed is measured as a function of time, temperature, and pressure. With the exception of pressure core samples, it is necessary to estimate the volume of gas lost while retrieving the samples. The "lost gas" volume is added to the measured gas volume to improve the accuracy of gas content estimates.
Title: Formation Evaluation Of Exploration Coalbed Methane Wells
Description:
Abstract
Sound development decisions for coalbed methane reservoirs, require accurate determination of gas in-place and natural fracture permeability.
The purpose of this paper is to outline procedures to evaluate reservoir properties required for prediction of well deliverability.
The steps are documented with data and analyses from San Juan Basin Fruitland Formation coalbed methane development projects.
The procedures are applicable to other sedimentary basins.
The first step in the evaluation program is to review available well and geologic data to select well locations and to design data collection programs.
These data include structure and stratigraphic maps, drilling records, logs, well tests, production records, gas content information, and fracture studies.
The next step in the evaluation is to collect gas content and permeability data from the first well or wells drilled.
Gas content is quantified with conventional core, pressure core, sidewall core, and drill cutting samples.
An example of the accuracy of gas content determinations from these sources is discussed.
The permeability of the fracture system is quantified with drill stem tests.
Testing procedures will be presented.
Following testing, open hole logging is performed.
Specifications for complete log suites are included.
Once the well site operations are concluded, it is necessary to determine the coal gas storage capacity and the properties of the coal and non-coal rocks from core analyses.
Natural fracture geometry is further quantified.
Well log analysis techniques are developed.
The core analyses, log analysis techniques, and the accuracy thereof will be documented.
The final step in the evaluation is to combine all of the above data and analyses to predict gas and water deliverability.
The methodology utilizes reservoir simulation which will be briefly discussed.
Introduction
The purpose of this paper is to present examples of the methodology required to evaluate the properties of coalbed methane reservoirs for deliverability prediction.
In order to make informed decisions concerning the economic viability of coalbed methane reservoir development, it is necessary to make accurate projections of fluid production rates over the life of the project.
As a simplified summary, accurate projections require estimates of the following reservoir properties which are components of Darcy's and Fide's Laws.
Reservoir Geometry
Fluid Volumes in Place
Fluid Properties Affecting Fluid Flow
Rock Properties Affecting Fluid Flow
The purpose of the first exploratory wells drilled into a reservoir is to collect as much of this information as possible.
Reservoir geometry estimates are most accurately determined by structural and stratigraphic mapping.
The fluid volumes in-place must be quantified with core and fluid samples with appropriate analyses.
The vast majority of the gas volume in-place is adsorbed in coal matrices.
Estimates of this volume require that coal samples be placed in desorption canisters immediately upon retrieval to surface, and that the volume of gas desorbed is measured as a function of time, temperature, and pressure.
With the exception of pressure core samples, it is necessary to estimate the volume of gas lost while retrieving the samples.
The "lost gas" volume is added to the measured gas volume to improve the accuracy of gas content estimates.
Related Results
The Classification and Model of Coalbed Methane Reservoirs
The Classification and Model of Coalbed Methane Reservoirs
Abstract Coalbed methane has been explored in many basins worldwide for 30 years, and has been developed commercially in some of the basins. Many researchers have described the ch...
A Method to Improve Computational Efficiency of Productivity Evaluation with Rectangular Coalbed Methane Reservoir
A Method to Improve Computational Efficiency of Productivity Evaluation with Rectangular Coalbed Methane Reservoir
Computational efficiency is the key factor to be considered in the productivity evaluation of rectangular coalbed methane reservoir. There are three main factors affecting the calc...
Comparisons of Pore Structure for Unconventional Tight Gas, Coalbed Methane and Shale Gas Reservoirs
Comparisons of Pore Structure for Unconventional Tight Gas, Coalbed Methane and Shale Gas Reservoirs
Extended abstract
Tight sands gas, coalbed methane and shale gas are three kinds of typical unconventional natural gas. With the decrease of conventional oil and gas...
Nanoscale pore structure in anthracite coals and its effect on methane adsorption capacity
Nanoscale pore structure in anthracite coals and its effect on methane adsorption capacity
Although significant amounts of methane are present in anthracite coal seams, coalbed methane resources cannot be extracted effectively and quickly. This study mainly focused on in...
Determining Permeability in Coalbed Methane Reservoirs
Determining Permeability in Coalbed Methane Reservoirs
ABSTRACT
The major objective of this paper is to identify the most generally applicable method to analyze pressure transient tests in coalbed methane reservoirs. The...
Comparison of Methane Control Methods in Polish and Vietnamese Coal Mines
Comparison of Methane Control Methods in Polish and Vietnamese Coal Mines
Methane hazard often occurs in hard coal mines and causes very serious accidents and can be the reason of methane or methane and coal dust explosions. History of coal mining shows ...
Resources Conditions of Coalbed Methane Districts in China
Resources Conditions of Coalbed Methane Districts in China
Abstract The China National Administration of Coal Geology accomplished an assessment of coalbed methane resources of China in 1988. The total amount of coalbed methane resources ...
Pool‐Forming Stages and Enrichment Models of Medium‐ to High‐Rank Coalbed Methane
Pool‐Forming Stages and Enrichment Models of Medium‐ to High‐Rank Coalbed Methane
Abstract:The pool‐forming mechanism of coalbed methane has its own characteristics. In this paper, based on studies on the typical coal‐bearing basins in China, it is pointed out t...

