Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Different mechanisms of homologous and heterologous μ‐opioid receptor phosphorylation
View through CrossRef
The efficiency of μ‐opioid receptor signalling is tightly regulated and ultimately limited by the coordinated phosphorylation of intracellular serine and threonine residues. Here, we review and discuss recent progress in the generation and application of phosphosite‐specific μ‐opioid receptor antibodies, which have proved to be excellent tools for monitoring the spatial and temporal dynamics of receptor phosphorylation and dephosphorylation. Agonist‐induced phosphorylation of μ‐opioid receptors occurs at a conserved 10 residue sequence370TREHPSTANT379in the receptor's carboxyl‐terminal cytoplasmic tail. Diverse opioids induce receptor phosphorylation atS375, present in the middle of this sequence, but only high‐efficacy opioids have the ability to drive higher order phosphorylation on flanking residues (T370,T376 andT379).S375 is the initiating residue in a hierarchical phosphorylation cascade. In contrast, agonist‐independent heterologous μ‐opioid receptor phosphorylation occurs primarily atT370. The combination of phosphosite‐specific antibodies and siRNAknockdown screening also facilitated the identification of relevant kinases and phosphatases. In fact, morphine induces a selectiveS375 phosphorylation that is predominantly catalysed byGPCRkinase 5 (GRK5), whereas multisite phosphorylation induced by high‐efficacy opioids specifically requiresGRK2/3. By contrast,T370 phosphorylation stimulated by phorbol esters or heterologous activation ofGq‐coupled receptors is mediated byPKCα. Rapid μ‐opioid receptor dephosphorylation occurs at or near the plasma membrane and is catalysed by protein phosphatase 1γ (PP1γ). These findings suggest that there are distinct phosphorylation motifs for homologous and heterologous regulation of μ‐opioid receptor phosphorylation. However, it remains to be seen to what extent different μ‐opioid receptor phosphorylation patterns contribute to the development of tolerance and dependencein vivo.Linked ArticlesThis article is part of a themed section on Opioids: New Pathways to Functional Selectivity. To view the other articles in this section visithttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bph.2015.172.issue-2
Title: Different mechanisms of homologous and heterologous μ‐opioid receptor phosphorylation
Description:
The efficiency of μ‐opioid receptor signalling is tightly regulated and ultimately limited by the coordinated phosphorylation of intracellular serine and threonine residues.
Here, we review and discuss recent progress in the generation and application of phosphosite‐specific μ‐opioid receptor antibodies, which have proved to be excellent tools for monitoring the spatial and temporal dynamics of receptor phosphorylation and dephosphorylation.
Agonist‐induced phosphorylation of μ‐opioid receptors occurs at a conserved 10 residue sequence370TREHPSTANT379in the receptor's carboxyl‐terminal cytoplasmic tail.
Diverse opioids induce receptor phosphorylation atS375, present in the middle of this sequence, but only high‐efficacy opioids have the ability to drive higher order phosphorylation on flanking residues (T370,T376 andT379).
S375 is the initiating residue in a hierarchical phosphorylation cascade.
In contrast, agonist‐independent heterologous μ‐opioid receptor phosphorylation occurs primarily atT370.
The combination of phosphosite‐specific antibodies and siRNAknockdown screening also facilitated the identification of relevant kinases and phosphatases.
In fact, morphine induces a selectiveS375 phosphorylation that is predominantly catalysed byGPCRkinase 5 (GRK5), whereas multisite phosphorylation induced by high‐efficacy opioids specifically requiresGRK2/3.
By contrast,T370 phosphorylation stimulated by phorbol esters or heterologous activation ofGq‐coupled receptors is mediated byPKCα.
Rapid μ‐opioid receptor dephosphorylation occurs at or near the plasma membrane and is catalysed by protein phosphatase 1γ (PP1γ).
These findings suggest that there are distinct phosphorylation motifs for homologous and heterologous regulation of μ‐opioid receptor phosphorylation.
However, it remains to be seen to what extent different μ‐opioid receptor phosphorylation patterns contribute to the development of tolerance and dependencein vivo.
Linked ArticlesThis article is part of a themed section on Opioids: New Pathways to Functional Selectivity.
To view the other articles in this section visithttp://dx.
doi.
org/10.
1111/bph.
2015.
172.
issue-2.
Related Results
A Large-Scale Observational Study on the Temporal Trends and Risk Factors of Opioid Overdose: Real-World Evidence for Better Opioids
A Large-Scale Observational Study on the Temporal Trends and Risk Factors of Opioid Overdose: Real-World Evidence for Better Opioids
Abstract
Background
The United States is in the midst of an opioid overdose epidemic. We evaluated the temporal trends and risk...
Mechanism of µ-Opioid Receptor-Magnesium Interaction and Positive Allosteric Modulation
Mechanism of µ-Opioid Receptor-Magnesium Interaction and Positive Allosteric Modulation
Abstract
In the era of opioid abuse epidemics, there is an increased demand for understanding how opioid receptors can be allosterically modulate...
Effectiveness of Perioperative Opioid Educational Initiatives: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Effectiveness of Perioperative Opioid Educational Initiatives: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND:
Opioids are the most commonly prescribed analgesics in the United States. Current guidelines have proposed education initiatives to reduce the risk ...
Leftover Opioid Analgesics and Disposal Following Ambulatory Pediatric Surgeries in the Context of a Restrictive Opioid-Prescribing Policy
Leftover Opioid Analgesics and Disposal Following Ambulatory Pediatric Surgeries in the Context of a Restrictive Opioid-Prescribing Policy
BACKGROUND:
Opioid analgesics are commonly prescribed for postoperative analgesia following pediatric surgery and often result in leftover opioid analgesics in the home...
Comparing the safety and efficacy of intravenous naloxone administration in opioid-naive and opioid-tolerant hospitalized oncology patients
Comparing the safety and efficacy of intravenous naloxone administration in opioid-naive and opioid-tolerant hospitalized oncology patients
Objective: To compare naloxone doses and clinical outcomes after emergency opioid reversal in opioid-naïve and opioid-tolerant inpatients.Design: Cross-sectional, retrospective cha...
Regulation of opioid receptors by opioid antagonists: implications for rapid opioid detoxification
Regulation of opioid receptors by opioid antagonists: implications for rapid opioid detoxification
AbstractOpioid receptor antagonists have long been used in the diagnosis of opioid dependence and in the treatment of both opioid overdose and addiction. More recently they have be...
Opioid use in young veterans
Opioid use in young veterans
Purpose: Data suggest an increase in prescription opioid abuse in recent years. Young veterans represent a group with major risk factors for prescription opioid abuse. The objectiv...
Postoperative Opioid Consumption After Scheduled Compared With Unscheduled Cesarean Delivery
Postoperative Opioid Consumption After Scheduled Compared With Unscheduled Cesarean Delivery
OBJECTIVE:
To identify characteristics associated with high inpatient daily opioid consumption after cesarean delivery.
METHODS:
...

