Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Different mechanisms of homologous and heterologous μ‐opioid receptor phosphorylation

View through CrossRef
The efficiency of μ‐opioid receptor signalling is tightly regulated and ultimately limited by the coordinated phosphorylation of intracellular serine and threonine residues. Here, we review and discuss recent progress in the generation and application of phosphosite‐specific μ‐opioid receptor antibodies, which have proved to be excellent tools for monitoring the spatial and temporal dynamics of receptor phosphorylation and dephosphorylation. Agonist‐induced phosphorylation of μ‐opioid receptors occurs at a conserved 10 residue sequence370TREHPSTANT379in the receptor's carboxyl‐terminal cytoplasmic tail. Diverse opioids induce receptor phosphorylation atS375, present in the middle of this sequence, but only high‐efficacy opioids have the ability to drive higher order phosphorylation on flanking residues (T370,T376 andT379).S375 is the initiating residue in a hierarchical phosphorylation cascade. In contrast, agonist‐independent heterologous μ‐opioid receptor phosphorylation occurs primarily atT370. The combination of phosphosite‐specific antibodies and siRNAknockdown screening also facilitated the identification of relevant kinases and phosphatases. In fact, morphine induces a selectiveS375 phosphorylation that is predominantly catalysed byGPCRkinase 5 (GRK5), whereas multisite phosphorylation induced by high‐efficacy opioids specifically requiresGRK2/3. By contrast,T370 phosphorylation stimulated by phorbol esters or heterologous activation ofGq‐coupled receptors is mediated byPKCα. Rapid μ‐opioid receptor dephosphorylation occurs at or near the plasma membrane and is catalysed by protein phosphatase 1γ (PP1γ). These findings suggest that there are distinct phosphorylation motifs for homologous and heterologous regulation of μ‐opioid receptor phosphorylation. However, it remains to be seen to what extent different μ‐opioid receptor phosphorylation patterns contribute to the development of tolerance and dependencein vivo.Linked ArticlesThis article is part of a themed section on Opioids: New Pathways to Functional Selectivity. To view the other articles in this section visithttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bph.2015.172.issue-2
Title: Different mechanisms of homologous and heterologous μ‐opioid receptor phosphorylation
Description:
The efficiency of μ‐opioid receptor signalling is tightly regulated and ultimately limited by the coordinated phosphorylation of intracellular serine and threonine residues.
Here, we review and discuss recent progress in the generation and application of phosphosite‐specific μ‐opioid receptor antibodies, which have proved to be excellent tools for monitoring the spatial and temporal dynamics of receptor phosphorylation and dephosphorylation.
Agonist‐induced phosphorylation of μ‐opioid receptors occurs at a conserved 10 residue sequence370TREHPSTANT379in the receptor's carboxyl‐terminal cytoplasmic tail.
Diverse opioids induce receptor phosphorylation atS375, present in the middle of this sequence, but only high‐efficacy opioids have the ability to drive higher order phosphorylation on flanking residues (T370,T376 andT379).
S375 is the initiating residue in a hierarchical phosphorylation cascade.
In contrast, agonist‐independent heterologous μ‐opioid receptor phosphorylation occurs primarily atT370.
The combination of phosphosite‐specific antibodies and siRNAknockdown screening also facilitated the identification of relevant kinases and phosphatases.
In fact, morphine induces a selectiveS375 phosphorylation that is predominantly catalysed byGPCRkinase 5 (GRK5), whereas multisite phosphorylation induced by high‐efficacy opioids specifically requiresGRK2/3.
By contrast,T370 phosphorylation stimulated by phorbol esters or heterologous activation ofGq‐coupled receptors is mediated byPKCα.
Rapid μ‐opioid receptor dephosphorylation occurs at or near the plasma membrane and is catalysed by protein phosphatase 1γ (PP1γ).
These findings suggest that there are distinct phosphorylation motifs for homologous and heterologous regulation of μ‐opioid receptor phosphorylation.
However, it remains to be seen to what extent different μ‐opioid receptor phosphorylation patterns contribute to the development of tolerance and dependencein vivo.
Linked ArticlesThis article is part of a themed section on Opioids: New Pathways to Functional Selectivity.
To view the other articles in this section visithttp://dx.
doi.
org/10.
1111/bph.
2015.
172.
issue-2.

Related Results

Mechanism of µ-Opioid Receptor-Magnesium Interaction and Positive Allosteric Modulation
Mechanism of µ-Opioid Receptor-Magnesium Interaction and Positive Allosteric Modulation
Abstract In the era of opioid abuse epidemics, there is an increased demand for understanding how opioid receptors can be allosterically modulate...
Opioid use in young veterans
Opioid use in young veterans
Purpose: Data suggest an increase in prescription opioid abuse in recent years. Young veterans represent a group with major risk factors for prescription opioid abuse. The objectiv...
Opioid e-prescribing trends at discharge in a large pediatric health system
Opioid e-prescribing trends at discharge in a large pediatric health system
Objective: Legitimate opioid prescriptions have been identified as a risk factor for opioid misuse in pediatric patients. In 2014, Pennsylvania legislation expanded a prescription ...
Comparing the Safety and Immunogenicity of homologous (Sputnik V) and heterologous (BNT162B2) COVID-19 prime-boost vaccination
Comparing the Safety and Immunogenicity of homologous (Sputnik V) and heterologous (BNT162B2) COVID-19 prime-boost vaccination
ABSTRACT Studies have shown increased immunogenicity from heterologous boosting. This study specifically assessed boosting with Pfizer-BioNTech in Sputnik V vaccina...

Back to Top