Javascript must be enabled to continue!
EXAMINATION OF A WITNESS WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO CROSS-EXAMINATION
View through CrossRef
One of the most important aspects of the adversarial system of law is the witness cross-examination, since the establishment of facts by the judiciary largely depends on oral testimony. The Indian Evidence Act 1872 provides a methodological way of investigating the witnesses that comprises examination-in-chief, cross-examination and re-examination, which has a procedural and substantive aim. Of them, such a powerful weapon as cross-examination will assume one of the leading positions among the means of checking the veracity, credibility, and reliability of the witness testimony. It is not merely a procedural formality but rather a very important protection mechanism to bring about fairness in the course of trial and to monitor natural justice principles.
This research paper is critically carried out to look at the concept, scope, objective, and limitations of witness examination with particular reference to cross-examination in the Indian law. It examines provisions of the law, judicial interpretations, and evidentiary principles of leading questions, impeachment of credit, hostile witnesses, and protective restrictions of indecent or scandalous questioning. The paper also examines the constitutional aspect of the cross-examination, especially in connection with the right to fair trial in Article 21 of the Constitution of India.
Other challenges, like the hostility of witnesses, intimidation, abuse of aggressive cross-examination tactics, and how digital modes of testimony are applied, are also discussed in the paper. The paper also uses the analysis of doctrines and allusions to significant judicial precedents to reveal the fine line between the right of the accused to confrontations and the necessity to respect the dignity and safety of the witnesses. It ends by proposing reforms to enhance procedural protections without the cross-examination role of the justice system by enhancing the truth-seeking.
Keywords: Examination of Witness, Cross-Examination, Indian Evidence Act, Fair Trial, Witness
Title: EXAMINATION OF A WITNESS WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO CROSS-EXAMINATION
Description:
One of the most important aspects of the adversarial system of law is the witness cross-examination, since the establishment of facts by the judiciary largely depends on oral testimony.
The Indian Evidence Act 1872 provides a methodological way of investigating the witnesses that comprises examination-in-chief, cross-examination and re-examination, which has a procedural and substantive aim.
Of them, such a powerful weapon as cross-examination will assume one of the leading positions among the means of checking the veracity, credibility, and reliability of the witness testimony.
It is not merely a procedural formality but rather a very important protection mechanism to bring about fairness in the course of trial and to monitor natural justice principles.
This research paper is critically carried out to look at the concept, scope, objective, and limitations of witness examination with particular reference to cross-examination in the Indian law.
It examines provisions of the law, judicial interpretations, and evidentiary principles of leading questions, impeachment of credit, hostile witnesses, and protective restrictions of indecent or scandalous questioning.
The paper also examines the constitutional aspect of the cross-examination, especially in connection with the right to fair trial in Article 21 of the Constitution of India.
Other challenges, like the hostility of witnesses, intimidation, abuse of aggressive cross-examination tactics, and how digital modes of testimony are applied, are also discussed in the paper.
The paper also uses the analysis of doctrines and allusions to significant judicial precedents to reveal the fine line between the right of the accused to confrontations and the necessity to respect the dignity and safety of the witnesses.
It ends by proposing reforms to enhance procedural protections without the cross-examination role of the justice system by enhancing the truth-seeking.
Keywords: Examination of Witness, Cross-Examination, Indian Evidence Act, Fair Trial, Witness.
Related Results
General method of constructing entanglement witness
General method of constructing entanglement witness
Quantum entanglement, as an indispensable resource in quantum communication and quantum computation, is widely used in the field of quantum information. However, people's understan...
Eyewitnesses versus assistant witnesses
Eyewitnesses versus assistant witnesses
According to the current legislation in Romania, the witness is a procedural subject. The criminal procedural law in Romania does not distinguish between the eyewitness and the ass...
Law Enforcement Regarding Witness Protection in the Investigation of Corruption Crimes in Indonesia
Law Enforcement Regarding Witness Protection in the Investigation of Corruption Crimes in Indonesia
In the investigation of corruption crimes, the role of witnesses is important, given that witness testimony is the strongest evidence in criminal proceedings. However, often the in...
The Development And Formative Evaluation Of Instructional Materials And Procedures Designed To Teach The Concept Of Christian Witness
The Development And Formative Evaluation Of Instructional Materials And Procedures Designed To Teach The Concept Of Christian Witness
Problem The members of the Seventh-day Adventist Church must witness if they are to fulfill the Gospel commission and spread the three angels' messages. Two factors which may be h...
MĂRTURIA CA FENOMEN EXISTENŢIAL
MĂRTURIA CA FENOMEN EXISTENŢIAL
In this article, I propose an exploration of the phenomenon of testimony. I argue that the phenomenological approach enables an integrative understanding of testimony, conceived as...
TELAAH NILAI PEMBUKTIAN DAN KEKUATAN PEMBUKTIAN ATAS PERLUASAN KETERANGAN SAKSI TESTIMONIUM DE AUDITU
TELAAH NILAI PEMBUKTIAN DAN KEKUATAN PEMBUKTIAN ATAS PERLUASAN KETERANGAN SAKSI TESTIMONIUM DE AUDITU
<p align="center"><strong><em>ABSTRAK</em></strong></p><p><em>Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji mengenai kesesuaian pembuktia...
Measuring Proximity: A Post-Interpretive Diagnostic Experiment in Art Criticism A Diagnostic Lens on Ethical Witnessing in Art Criticism
Measuring Proximity: A Post-Interpretive Diagnostic Experiment in Art Criticism A Diagnostic Lens on Ethical Witnessing in Art Criticism
Contemporary art criticism often advances by way of interpretive extraction. Works are translated into meanings, themes, intentions, and arguments, which then circulate with remark...
Grammer of Grief
Grammer of Grief
This essay investigates the relationship between mourning and linguistic structure, proposing that grief produces not merely emotional disruption but a reconfiguration of grammar i...

