Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Reply to Nat Hansen
View through CrossRef
Hansen is certainly right that the aim of my ‘Travis examples’ is, not to explain anything, but rather to point to a phenomenon. Or perhaps I would not now say so much as that. Over the course of my career I have been very deeply influenced by John McDowell. The main lesson I have taken from him is that the most important ‘result’ in philosophy—one of its most important tasks—is showing (to borrow a bit of McDowellian terminology) how it is ...
Title: Reply to Nat Hansen
Description:
Hansen is certainly right that the aim of my ‘Travis examples’ is, not to explain anything, but rather to point to a phenomenon.
Or perhaps I would not now say so much as that.
Over the course of my career I have been very deeply influenced by John McDowell.
The main lesson I have taken from him is that the most important ‘result’ in philosophy—one of its most important tasks—is showing (to borrow a bit of McDowellian terminology) how it is .
Related Results
Reply to Alex Davies
Reply to Alex Davies
Davies casts the idea of occasion-sensitivity in a different form than any I have given it. He offers a new and original perspective on the phenomena. It helps in making issues cle...

