Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Anastomotic leak after manual circular stapled left-sided bowel surgery: analysis of technology-, disease-, and patient-related factors
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Background
Anastomotic leak rates after colorectal surgery remain high. In most left-sided colon and rectal resection surgeries, a circular stapler is utilized to create the primary bowel anastomosis. However, it remains unclear whether a relationship between circular stapler technology and anastomotic leak in left-sided colorectal surgery exists.
Methods
A post-hoc analysis was conducted using a prospectively collected data set of patients from the 2017 European Society of Coloproctology snapshot audit who underwent elective left-sided resection (left hemicolectomy, sigmoid colectomy, or rectal resection) with a manual circular stapled anastomosis. Rates of anastomotic leak and unplanned intensive care unit stay in association with manual circular stapling were assessed. Patient-, disease-, geographical-, and surgeon-related factors as well as stapler brand were explored using multivariable regression models to identify predictors of adverse outcomes.
Results
Across 3305 procedures, 8.0% of patients had an anastomotic leak and 2.1% had an unplanned intensive care unit stay. Independent predictors of anastomotic leak were male sex, minimal-access surgery converted to open surgery, and anastomosis height C11 (lower third rectum) (all P < 0.050). Independent predictors of unplanned intensive care unit stay were minimal-access surgery converted to open surgery and American Society of Anesthesiologists grade IV (all P < 0.050). Stapler device brand was not a predictor of anastomotic leak or unplanned intensive care unit stay in multivariable regression analysis. There were no differences in rates of anastomotic leak and unplanned intensive care unit stay according to stapler head diameter, geographical region, or surgeon experience.
Conclusion
In patients undergoing left-sided bowel anastomosis, choice of manual circular stapler, in terms of manufacturer or head diameter, is not associated with rates of anastomotic leak and unplanned intensive care unit stay.
Oxford University Press (OUP)
C Tong
N Jamous
N-D Schmitz
K Szwarcensztein
DG Morton
TD Pinkney
A El-Hussuna
N Battersby
A Bhangu
S Blackwell
N Buchs
S Chaudhri
D Dardanov
A Dulskas
A El-Hussuna
M Frasson
G Gallo
J Glasbey
J Keatley
M Kelly
C Knowles
YE Li
V McCourt
A Minaya-Bravo
P Neary
I Negoi
D Nepogodiev
F Pata
G Pellino
T Poskus
L Sanchez-Guillen
B Singh
E Sivrikoz
G van Ramshorst
O Zmora
TD Pinkney
R Perry
EL Magill
J Keatley
C Tong
SE Ahmed
M Abdalkoddus
A Abelevich
S Abraham
M Abraham-Nordling
SI Achkasov
M Adamina
C Agalar
F Agalar
T Agarwal
O Agcaoglu
F Agresta
G Ahmad
A Ainkov
R Aiupov
VS Aledo
A Aleksic
F Aleotti
D Alias
AS Allison
A Alonso
S Alonso
R Alós
Y Altinel
M Alvarez-Gallego
E Amorim
G Anania
PS Andreev
P Andrejevic
V Andriola
N Antonacci
F Antos
M Anwer
P Aonzo
JJ Arenal
B Arencibia
S Argeny
SJ Arnold
S Arolfo
DY Artioukh
MA Ashraf
MI Aslam
CR Asteria
M Atif
S Avital
M Bacchion
SM Bach
R Balestri
A Balfour
E Balik
I Baloyiannis
GS Banipal
JEM Baral
B Barišić
I Bartella
G Barugola
GA Bass
MR Bedford
A Bedzhanyan
A Belli
J Beltrán de Heredia
WA Bemelman
V Benčurik
A Benevento
DJ Bergkvist
JC Bernal-Sprekelsen
I Besznyák
V Bettencourt
AJ Beveridge
C Bhan
S Bilali
V Bilali
E Binboga
V Bintintan
A Birindelli
T Birsan
F Blanco-Antona
RLGM Blom
EG Boerma
M Bogdan
MZ Boland
P Bondeven
A Bondurri
J Broadhurst
SA Brown
P Buccianti
NC Buchs
P Buchwald
D Bugra
A Bursics
HLE Burton
CJ Buskens
C Bustamante Recuenco
C Cagigas-Fernandez
A Calero-Lillo
V Calu
I Camps
AE Canda
L Canning
S Cantafio
A Carpelan
MJ Carrillo Lopez
JM Carvas
M Carvello
J Castellvi
J Castillo
J Castillo-Diego
V Cavenaile
L Cayetano Paniagua
AA Ceccotti
J Cervera-Aldama
A Chabok
PC Chandrasinghe
N Chandratreya
SS Chaudhri
ZU Chaudhry
P Chirletti
J Chi-Yong Ngu
C Chouliaras
M Chowdhary
NA Chowdri
AB Christiano
P Christiansen
MA Citores
C Ciubotaru
C Ciuce
N Clemente
D Clerc
A Codina-Cazador
E Colak
L Colao García
D Coletta
F Colombo
TM Connelly
S Cornaglia
J Corte Real
J Costa Pereira
S Costa
E Cotte
ED Courtney
AP Coveney
P Crapa
DA Cristian
M Cuadrado
K Cuinas
MV Cuk
VV Cuk
MF Cunha
R Curinga
N Curtis
E Dainius
A d'Alessandro
RSJ Dalton
IR Daniels
D Dardanov
B Dauser
O Davydova
B De Andrés-Asenjo
EJR de Graaf
F De la Portilla
FB de Lacy
ECD De Laspra
B Defoort
T Dehli
L Del Prete
P Delrio
S Demirbas
A Demirkiran
FC Den Boer
S Di Saverio
A Diego
B Dieguez
M Diez-Alonso
I Dimitrijevic
B Dimitrios
N Dimitriou
G Dindelegan
S Dindyal
H Domingos
PG Doornebosch
S Dorot
M Draga
I Drami
A Dulskas
A Dzulkarnaen Zakaria
E Echazarreta-Gallego
Y Edden
M Egenvall
V Eismontas
A El Nakeeb
M El Sorogy
H Elfike
A Elgeidie
A El-Hussuna
M Elía Guedea
S Ellul
S El-Masry
U Elmore
SH Emile
O Enciu
JM Enriquez-Navascues
JC Epstein
D Escolà Ripoll
B Espina
E Espin-Basany
AM Estévez Diz
MD Evans
PA Farina
Fatayer
F Feliu
C Feo
CV Feo
J Fernando
F Feroci
L Ferreira
T Feryn
B Flor-Lorente
A Forero-Torres
N Francis
M Frasson
MR Freund
M Fróis Borges
A Frontali
AB Gallardo
R Galleano
G Gallo
D Garcia
LJ García Flórez
JA García Marín
J García Septiem
AM Garcia-Cabrera
JM García-González
E Garcia-Granero
M Garipov
R Gefen
P Gennadiy
S Gerkis
A Germain
S Germanos
L Gianotti
M Gil Santos
C Gingert
O Glehen
T Golda
M Gómez Ruiz
D Gonçalves
JS González
J Grainger
F Grama
C Grant
J Griniatsos
T Grolich
J Grosek
J Guevara-Martínez
B Gulcu
SK Gupta
SV Gurjar
S Haapaniemi
Y Hamad
M Hamid
J Hardt
RL Harries
GJC Harris
L Harsanyi
J Hayes
ER Hendriks
F Herbst
N Hermann
A Heuberger
R Hompes
A Hrora
M Hübner
H Huhtinen
L Hunt
M Hyöty
N Ibañez
D Ignjatovic
A Ilkanich
M Inama
MS Infantino
MR Iqbal
A Isik
O Isik
M Ismaiel
SO Ivanovich
V Jadhav
D Jajtner
V Jiménez Carneros
RM Jimenez-Rodriguez
V Jotautas
K Jukka
J Juloski
B Jung
Y Kara
U Karabacak
A Karachun
S Karagul
M Kassai
E Katorkin Sergei
D Katsaounis
IE Katsoulis
ME Kelly
B Kenjić
S Keogh-Bootland
D Khasan
A Khazov
SH Kho
GN Khrykov
AJ Kivelä
MD Kjaer
JS Knight
P Kocián
T Koëter
JLM Konsten
J Korček
D Korkolis
S Korsgen
IS Kostić
PM Krarup
P Krastev
I Krdzic
E Kreisler Moreno
Z Krivokapic
CJ Krones
D Kršul
N Kumar Kaul
F La Torre
N Lahodzich
CW Lai
JLB Laina
Z Lakkis
S Lamas
CP Lange
A Lauretta
KA Lee
J Lefèvre
T Lehtonen
CA Leo
KJ Leong
A Lepistö
L Licari
P Lizdenis
P Loftås
M Longhi
J Lopez-Dominguez
J López-Fernández
H Lovén
R Lozoya Trujillo
R Lunin
AP Luzzi
ML Lydrup
J Lykke
VM Maderuelo-Garcia
T Madsboell
AH Madsen
A Maffioli
MA Majbar
A Makhmudov
D Makhmudov
KI Malik
SS Malik
ZZ Mamedli
DK Manatakis
R Mankotia
J Maria
NM Mariani
K Marimuthu
F Marinello
F Marino
G Marom
N Maroni
I Maroulis
P Marsanic
HA Marsman
M Martí-Gallostra
ST Martin
J Martinez Alegre
A Martinez Manzano
R Martins
S Maslyankov
K McArdle
DR McArthur
C McFaul
D McWhirter
D Mege
A Mehraj
MZ Metwally
IH Metwally
M Millan
AS Miller
A Minaya-Bravo
A Mingoli
G Minguez Ruiz
C Minusa
B Mirshekar-Syahkal
M Mistrangelo
SS Mogoanta
I Mohamed
PH Möller
T Möller
M Molteni
S Mompart
B Monami
M Mondragon-Pritchard
Pedro Moniz-Pereira
D Montesdeoca Cabrera
M Morais
BJ Moran
G Moretto
M Morino
A Moscovici
S Muench
H Mukhtar
P Muller
A Muñoz-Duyos
A Muratore
P Muriel
P Myrelid
M Nachtergaele
H Nadav
K Nastos
A Navarro-Sánchez
I Negoi
A Nesbakken
G Nestler
J Nicholls
D Nicol
M Nikberg
JMS Nobre
J Nonner
G Norčič
S Norderval
MGA Norwood
J Nygren
JW O’Brien
PR O’Connell
J O'Kelly
N Okkabaz
M Oliveira-Cunha
GEEI Omar
P Onody
E Opocher
J Orhalmi
FJ Orts-Micó
GS Ozbalci
U Ozgen
BB Ozkan
E Ozturk
K Pace
MH Padín
SB Pandey
JA Pando
I Papaconstantinou
A Papadopoulos
G Papadopoulos
G Papp
S Paraskakis
Y Parc
P Parra Baños
FQ Parray
R Parvuletu
A Pascariello
I Pascual Migueláñez
F Pata
H Patel
PK Patel
HM Paterson
JC Patrón Uriburu
GC Pattacini
V Pavlov
A Pcolkins
EM Pellicer-Franco
E Peña Ros
HD Pérez
P Petkov
P Picarella
AJ Pikarsky
A Pisani Ceretti
E Platt
P Pletinckx
M Podda
D Popov
E Poskus
T Poskus
MC Prats
I Pravosudov
V Primo-Romaguera
V Prochazka
I Pros Ribas
D Proud
J Psaila
F Pullig
MS Qureshi Jinnah
J Rachadell Montero
D Radovanovic
Z Radovanovic
MM Rahman
R Rainho
N Rama
D Ramos
A Ramsanahie
A Rantala
A Rasulov
T Rautio
T Raymond
A Raza
A Reddy
B Refky
L Regusci
P Reissman
M Rems
ML Reyes-Diaz
R Riccardo
G Richiteanu
F Richter
A Rios
F Ris
FL Rodriguez
P Rodriguez Garcia
JA Rojo Lopez
M Romaniszyn
GM Romano
AS Romero
M Romero-Simó
A Roshan Lal
B Rossi
A Ruano Poblador
M Rubbini
I Rubio-Perez
H Ruiz
E Rullier
O Ryska
D Sabia
M Sacchi
N Saffaf
A Sakr
Z Saladzinskas
I Sales
M Salomon
S Salvans
NE Samalavicius
G Sammarco
GM Sampietro
D Samsonov
JL Sanchez-Garcia
L Sánchez-Guillén
E Sanchiz
G Šantak
J Santos Torres
F Saraceno
IS Sarici
PB Sarmah
G Savino
S Scabini
C Schafmayer
B Schiltz
A Schofield
R Scurtu
E Segalini
J Segelman
JJ Segura Sampedro
R Seicean
A Sekulic
D Selwyn
P Serrano Paz
J Shabbir
IA Shaikh
M Shalaby
A Sharma
A Shukla
N Shussman
ZA Siddiqui
P Siironen
P Sileri
P Silva-Vaz
JF Simoes
H Sinan
B Singh
A Sivins
G Skroubis
M Skrovina
AJ Skull
M Slavchev
M Slavin
AAP Slesser
CJ Smart
NJ Smart
K Smedh
S Smolarek
M Sokolov
O Sotona
D Spacca
A Spinelli
G Stanojevic
A Stearns
S Stefan
A Stift
J Stijns
V Stoyanov
D Straarup
R Strouhal
BM Stubbs
C Suero Rodríguez
U Sungurtekin
S Svagzdys
I Svastics
I Syk
MJM Tabares
A Tamelis
RG Tamhane
N Tamini
A Tamosiunas
SA Tan
PJ Tanis
SJ Tate
V Tercioti Junior
C Terzi
V Testa
MA Thaha
JC Tham
N Thavanesan
JE Theodore
C Tinoco
M Todorovic
A Tomazic
V Tomulescu
V Tonini
BR Toorenvliet
J Torkington
A Torrance
MJ Toscano
I Tóth
S Trampus
E Travaglio
I Trostchanky
N Truan
H Tulchinsky
V Turrado-Rodriguez
R Tutino
A Tzivanakis
GA Tzovaras
LW Unger
S Vaccari
CJ Vaizey
G Valero-Navarro
I Valverde Nuñez
K Van Belle
K Van Belle
I van den Berg
AAW van Geloven
YT Van Loon
L van Steensel
M Varcada
AV Vardanyan
P Varpe
VR Velchuru
J Vencius
D Venskutonis
M Vermaas
M Vertruyen
M Vicente-Ruiz
A Vignali
V Vigorita
M Vila Tura
D Vimalachandran
L Vincenti
L Viso
RGJ Visschers
YS Voronin
P Walega
WZ Wan Zainira
JH Wang
X Wang
R Wani
J Warusavitarne
A Warwick
N Wasserberg
DJ Weiss
E Westerduin
JR Wheat
I White
G Williams
GL Williams
TR Wilson
JM Wilson
D Winter
AM Wolthuis
MPK Wong
J Worsøe
E Xynos
S Yahia
T Yamamoto
A Yanishev
Z Zaidi
MA Zairul Azwan
S Zaman
A Zaránd
A Zarco
M Zawadzki
M Zelic
P Žeromskas
M Zilvetti
O Zmora
Title: Anastomotic leak after manual circular stapled left-sided bowel surgery: analysis of technology-, disease-, and patient-related factors
Description:
Abstract
Background
Anastomotic leak rates after colorectal surgery remain high.
In most left-sided colon and rectal resection surgeries, a circular stapler is utilized to create the primary bowel anastomosis.
However, it remains unclear whether a relationship between circular stapler technology and anastomotic leak in left-sided colorectal surgery exists.
Methods
A post-hoc analysis was conducted using a prospectively collected data set of patients from the 2017 European Society of Coloproctology snapshot audit who underwent elective left-sided resection (left hemicolectomy, sigmoid colectomy, or rectal resection) with a manual circular stapled anastomosis.
Rates of anastomotic leak and unplanned intensive care unit stay in association with manual circular stapling were assessed.
Patient-, disease-, geographical-, and surgeon-related factors as well as stapler brand were explored using multivariable regression models to identify predictors of adverse outcomes.
Results
Across 3305 procedures, 8.
0% of patients had an anastomotic leak and 2.
1% had an unplanned intensive care unit stay.
Independent predictors of anastomotic leak were male sex, minimal-access surgery converted to open surgery, and anastomosis height C11 (lower third rectum) (all P < 0.
050).
Independent predictors of unplanned intensive care unit stay were minimal-access surgery converted to open surgery and American Society of Anesthesiologists grade IV (all P < 0.
050).
Stapler device brand was not a predictor of anastomotic leak or unplanned intensive care unit stay in multivariable regression analysis.
There were no differences in rates of anastomotic leak and unplanned intensive care unit stay according to stapler head diameter, geographical region, or surgeon experience.
Conclusion
In patients undergoing left-sided bowel anastomosis, choice of manual circular stapler, in terms of manufacturer or head diameter, is not associated with rates of anastomotic leak and unplanned intensive care unit stay.
Related Results
Hydatid Disease of The Brain Parenchyma: A Systematic Review
Hydatid Disease of The Brain Parenchyma: A Systematic Review
Abstarct
Introduction
Isolated brain hydatid disease (BHD) is an extremely rare form of echinococcosis. A prompt and timely diagnosis is a crucial step in disease management. This ...
Non-Gastrointestinal Complications and Short-Term Outcomes in Patients With Anastomotic Leak After Colon Resection: A Propensity Matched Analysis of American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database
Non-Gastrointestinal Complications and Short-Term Outcomes in Patients With Anastomotic Leak After Colon Resection: A Propensity Matched Analysis of American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database
Introduction: Anastomotic leak is a devastating complication after colorectal surgery. There is paucity of data on non-gastrointestinal complications after anastomotic leak in this...
Risk factor analysis of enterocutaneous fistula after small bowel surgery
Risk factor analysis of enterocutaneous fistula after small bowel surgery
Abstract:
Background: ECF most frequently follows a complication of abdominal surgery, although a smaller number occur spontaneously in association with conditia
Background: Entero...
Radiological appearances of Anastomotic Leakage after Radical Gastrectomy
Radiological appearances of Anastomotic Leakage after Radical Gastrectomy
Abstract
Background
Anastomotic leakage is a critical postoperative complication after gastric cancer surgery. Previous studies...
Single layer vs double layer intestinal anastomosis- a prospective comparative study.
Single layer vs double layer intestinal anastomosis- a prospective comparative study.
Abstract
Gastrointestinal anastomosis is one of the commonest surgical procedure performed worldwide. The aim of the anastomosis is to make a sound alignment of the bowel t...
Treatment of Intrathoracic Anastomotic Leak After Esophagectomy with the Sump Drainage Tube
Treatment of Intrathoracic Anastomotic Leak After Esophagectomy with the Sump Drainage Tube
Abstract
Background: Intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomotic leak is one of the deadliest complications after esophagectomy. In recent years, we have implemented new meth...
320. RISK FACTORS FOR BENIGN ANASTOMOTIC STENOSIS AFTER ESOPHAGEAL CANCER SURGERY
320. RISK FACTORS FOR BENIGN ANASTOMOTIC STENOSIS AFTER ESOPHAGEAL CANCER SURGERY
Abstract
Background
Benign strictures occur frequently following an esophagectomy, causing dysphagia, problems with eating, and ...
Blunt Chest Trauma and Chylothorax: A Systematic Review
Blunt Chest Trauma and Chylothorax: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction: Although traumatic chylothorax is predominantly associated with penetrating injuries, instances following blunt trauma, as a rare and challenging condition, ...

