Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Regorafenib in Bone Sarcoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Its Effectiveness and Safety in Cancer Treatment

View through CrossRef
Abstract Objectives Bone sarcomas are aggressive malignancies with limited treatment options in advanced stages. Regorafenib, an oral multi-kinase inhibitor, has showed potential efficacy in early-phase trials. However, its overall effectiveness and safety profile in bone sarcoma remain unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to assess the clinical impact of regorafenib on survival outcomes and adverse events in patients with bone sarcomas. Methods A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published between September 27, 2012, and April 2024. Eligible studies included full-text RCTs comparing regorafenib to placebo in the treatment of bone sarcomas. Meta-analyses, reviews, case reports, conference abstracts, ongoing trials, and animal studies were excluded from the analysis. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs). Data synthesis was performed using a random-effects model, and heterogeneity was assessed via the I² statistic. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool (RoB 2) was applied to evaluate study quality. Statistical analysis was conducted using R version 4.3.1. Results A total of five RCTs met the inclusion criteria. Regorafenib significantly improved PFS compared to placebo (MD = 9.69 weeks; 95% CI: 4.54, 14.84; I² = 0%), while no statistically significant improvement was observed in OS (MD = 0.85 weeks; 95% CI:-36.33, 38.02; I² = 0%). Predominantly observed treatment-emergent effects linked to regorafenib included hand-foot skin reaction, hypertension, asthenia or fatigue, and diarrhea. Conclusion Regorafenib significantly improves progression-free survival in bone sarcoma but does not show a clear benefit in overall survival. While adverse events are common, they are generally manageable. Further research is needed to optimize dosing, patient selection, and to determine the long-term survival benefits.
Title: Regorafenib in Bone Sarcoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Its Effectiveness and Safety in Cancer Treatment
Description:
Abstract Objectives Bone sarcomas are aggressive malignancies with limited treatment options in advanced stages.
Regorafenib, an oral multi-kinase inhibitor, has showed potential efficacy in early-phase trials.
However, its overall effectiveness and safety profile in bone sarcoma remain unclear.
This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to assess the clinical impact of regorafenib on survival outcomes and adverse events in patients with bone sarcomas.
Methods A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published between September 27, 2012, and April 2024.
Eligible studies included full-text RCTs comparing regorafenib to placebo in the treatment of bone sarcomas.
Meta-analyses, reviews, case reports, conference abstracts, ongoing trials, and animal studies were excluded from the analysis.
The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs).
Data synthesis was performed using a random-effects model, and heterogeneity was assessed via the I² statistic.
The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool (RoB 2) was applied to evaluate study quality.
Statistical analysis was conducted using R version 4.
3.
1.
Results A total of five RCTs met the inclusion criteria.
Regorafenib significantly improved PFS compared to placebo (MD = 9.
69 weeks; 95% CI: 4.
54, 14.
84; I² = 0%), while no statistically significant improvement was observed in OS (MD = 0.
85 weeks; 95% CI:-36.
33, 38.
02; I² = 0%).
Predominantly observed treatment-emergent effects linked to regorafenib included hand-foot skin reaction, hypertension, asthenia or fatigue, and diarrhea.
Conclusion Regorafenib significantly improves progression-free survival in bone sarcoma but does not show a clear benefit in overall survival.
While adverse events are common, they are generally manageable.
Further research is needed to optimize dosing, patient selection, and to determine the long-term survival benefits.

Related Results

Pembrolizumab and Sarcoma: A meta-analysis
Pembrolizumab and Sarcoma: A meta-analysis
Abstract Introduction: Pembrolizumab is a monoclonal antibody that promotes antitumor immunity. This study presents a systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety...
Frequency of Common Chromosomal Abnormalities in Patients with Idiopathic Acquired Aplastic Anemia
Frequency of Common Chromosomal Abnormalities in Patients with Idiopathic Acquired Aplastic Anemia
Objective: To determine the frequency of common chromosomal aberrations in local population idiopathic determine the frequency of common chromosomal aberrations in local population...
Are Cervical Ribs Indicators of Childhood Cancer? A Narrative Review
Are Cervical Ribs Indicators of Childhood Cancer? A Narrative Review
Abstract A cervical rib (CR), also known as a supernumerary or extra rib, is an additional rib that forms above the first rib, resulting from the overgrowth of the transverse proce...
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Abstract Introduction Tarlatamab is a Delta-like ligand 3 (DLL3) -directed bispecific T-cell engager recently approved for use in patients with advanced small cell lung cancer (SCL...
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical a...
Edoxaban and Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism: A Meta-analysis of Clinical Trials
Edoxaban and Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism: A Meta-analysis of Clinical Trials
Abstract Introduction Cancer patients face a venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk that is up to 50 times higher compared to individuals without cancer. In 2010, direct oral anticoagul...
Poster 107: The Use of Coacervate Sustained Release System to Identify the Most Potent BMP for Bone Regeneration
Poster 107: The Use of Coacervate Sustained Release System to Identify the Most Potent BMP for Bone Regeneration
Objectives: Bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) belong to the transforming growth factor superfamily that were first discovered by Marshall Urist. There are 14 B...

Back to Top