Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Development of a Universal Ranking for Friction Reducer Performance
View through CrossRef
Abstract
In hydraulic fracturing, large amounts of water are pumped at high speed down the wellbore. To reduce pump pressure and costs, a friction reducer is added to the stream. There is currently no unified performance criteria for selection of friction reducers. This work outlines the methodology for producing such a unified method of comparing performance between any friction reducer chemical additives, both liquid and dry powder.
A 0.5 inch stainless steel high-flow low-shear flow loop pumping at ranges between three and twenty gallons per minute was custom-built. The loop uses a Coriolis flow meter, two absolute pressure transducers, and one differential pressure transducer to accurately determine the friction reducer additive performance in any given fluid by measuring pressure drop across a section of developed flow. This paper utilizes over 400 in-house flow loop tests to establish a novel unified ranking system for the evaluation of friction reducers’ performance. The ranking is independent of the type of friction reducer used and quality of water. Produced waters, fresh water, treated produced waters, and synthetic waters were all used to validate the methodology and ranking system to create a unified criteria to compare performance of any friction reducers.
Tomson Technologies created a standardized metric for assessing and ranking friction reducer performance. This standardization was achieved through the use of an unique performance scale comprised of the weighted average of the most important friction reduction parameters of a friction reducer in any produced water: (1) inversion time (InvT), (2) maximum percent friction reduction (Max% FR), (3) time to sustain maximum percent friction reduction (RetT@%Avg.FRmax), and (4) the percent friction reduction at the end of 500 seconds (% FR@500s). 500 seconds is used because fluid during hydraulic fractures travels from the pumps to the reservoir in 500 or fewer seconds in almost all cases. This scale is measured in a new unit called "Friction Reducer Units" (FRU), which ranges from 0 to 10. FRU has been used to rank and correlate the performance of different classes of friction reducers in various types of waters, resulting in a comprehensive results database and is used to show applicability of the overall metric.
Title: Development of a Universal Ranking for Friction Reducer Performance
Description:
Abstract
In hydraulic fracturing, large amounts of water are pumped at high speed down the wellbore.
To reduce pump pressure and costs, a friction reducer is added to the stream.
There is currently no unified performance criteria for selection of friction reducers.
This work outlines the methodology for producing such a unified method of comparing performance between any friction reducer chemical additives, both liquid and dry powder.
A 0.
5 inch stainless steel high-flow low-shear flow loop pumping at ranges between three and twenty gallons per minute was custom-built.
The loop uses a Coriolis flow meter, two absolute pressure transducers, and one differential pressure transducer to accurately determine the friction reducer additive performance in any given fluid by measuring pressure drop across a section of developed flow.
This paper utilizes over 400 in-house flow loop tests to establish a novel unified ranking system for the evaluation of friction reducers’ performance.
The ranking is independent of the type of friction reducer used and quality of water.
Produced waters, fresh water, treated produced waters, and synthetic waters were all used to validate the methodology and ranking system to create a unified criteria to compare performance of any friction reducers.
Tomson Technologies created a standardized metric for assessing and ranking friction reducer performance.
This standardization was achieved through the use of an unique performance scale comprised of the weighted average of the most important friction reduction parameters of a friction reducer in any produced water: (1) inversion time (InvT), (2) maximum percent friction reduction (Max% FR), (3) time to sustain maximum percent friction reduction (RetT@%Avg.
FRmax), and (4) the percent friction reduction at the end of 500 seconds (% FR@500s).
500 seconds is used because fluid during hydraulic fractures travels from the pumps to the reservoir in 500 or fewer seconds in almost all cases.
This scale is measured in a new unit called "Friction Reducer Units" (FRU), which ranges from 0 to 10.
FRU has been used to rank and correlate the performance of different classes of friction reducers in various types of waters, resulting in a comprehensive results database and is used to show applicability of the overall metric.
Related Results
A New Insight into Friction Reducer Evaluation for Slickwater Unconventional Fracturing
A New Insight into Friction Reducer Evaluation for Slickwater Unconventional Fracturing
Abstract
Slickwater fracturing has increased over the past couple of decades in the development of shale and tight formations. Friction reducer is the main component...
Installation Analysis of Matterhorn Pipeline Replacement
Installation Analysis of Matterhorn Pipeline Replacement
Abstract
The paper describes the installation analysis for the Matterhorn field pipeline replacement, located in water depths between 800-ft to 1200-ft in the Gul...
Case Studies: Impact of high Salt Tolerant Friction Reducers on Fresh Water Conservation in Canadian Shale Fracturing Treatments
Case Studies: Impact of high Salt Tolerant Friction Reducers on Fresh Water Conservation in Canadian Shale Fracturing Treatments
Abstract
Tight low permeability shale reservoirs must be stimulated to produce commercially viable gas quantities. This requires large volumes of slick water frac fl...
Design and Testing of a New Type of Planetary Traction Drive Bearing-Type Reducer
Design and Testing of a New Type of Planetary Traction Drive Bearing-Type Reducer
This paper presents the design and development of a new type of planetary traction drive bearing-type reducer. In this design, the transmission outer ring is replaced with an elast...
Tuning the Friction of Silicon Surfaces Using Nanopatterns at the Nanoscale
Tuning the Friction of Silicon Surfaces Using Nanopatterns at the Nanoscale
Friction and wear become significant at small scale lengths, particularly in MEMS/NEMS. Nanopatterns are regarded as a potential approach to solve these problems. In this paper, we...
Design and Development of an Ultra-Low Friction and High Power-Density Diesel for the Indian Market
Design and Development of an Ultra-Low Friction and High Power-Density Diesel for the Indian Market
<div class="section abstract"><div class="htmlview paragraph">This paper explains the methodology to design a high power-density diesel engine capable of 180 bar peak f...
Case Studies: Improved Performance of High Brine Friction Reducers in Fracturing Shale Reserviors
Case Studies: Improved Performance of High Brine Friction Reducers in Fracturing Shale Reserviors
Abstract
The primary purpose of friction reducers (FR’s) used in stimulating shale reservoirs is to overcome tubular friction pressure and establish high pumping rat...
Effects of the Physical Properties of Resins on Friction Performance
Effects of the Physical Properties of Resins on Friction Performance
<div class="section abstract"><div class="htmlview paragraph">The friction performance of a wet clutch for an automatic transmission (AT) depends on the interaction bet...

