Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Development of a Universal Ranking for Friction Reducer Performance

View through CrossRef
Abstract In hydraulic fracturing, large amounts of water are pumped at high speed down the wellbore. To reduce pump pressure and costs, a friction reducer is added to the stream. There is currently no unified performance criteria for selection of friction reducers. This work outlines the methodology for producing such a unified method of comparing performance between any friction reducer chemical additives, both liquid and dry powder. A 0.5 inch stainless steel high-flow low-shear flow loop pumping at ranges between three and twenty gallons per minute was custom-built. The loop uses a Coriolis flow meter, two absolute pressure transducers, and one differential pressure transducer to accurately determine the friction reducer additive performance in any given fluid by measuring pressure drop across a section of developed flow. This paper utilizes over 400 in-house flow loop tests to establish a novel unified ranking system for the evaluation of friction reducers’ performance. The ranking is independent of the type of friction reducer used and quality of water. Produced waters, fresh water, treated produced waters, and synthetic waters were all used to validate the methodology and ranking system to create a unified criteria to compare performance of any friction reducers. Tomson Technologies created a standardized metric for assessing and ranking friction reducer performance. This standardization was achieved through the use of an unique performance scale comprised of the weighted average of the most important friction reduction parameters of a friction reducer in any produced water: (1) inversion time (InvT), (2) maximum percent friction reduction (Max% FR), (3) time to sustain maximum percent friction reduction (RetT@%Avg.FRmax), and (4) the percent friction reduction at the end of 500 seconds (% FR@500s). 500 seconds is used because fluid during hydraulic fractures travels from the pumps to the reservoir in 500 or fewer seconds in almost all cases. This scale is measured in a new unit called "Friction Reducer Units" (FRU), which ranges from 0 to 10. FRU has been used to rank and correlate the performance of different classes of friction reducers in various types of waters, resulting in a comprehensive results database and is used to show applicability of the overall metric.
Title: Development of a Universal Ranking for Friction Reducer Performance
Description:
Abstract In hydraulic fracturing, large amounts of water are pumped at high speed down the wellbore.
To reduce pump pressure and costs, a friction reducer is added to the stream.
There is currently no unified performance criteria for selection of friction reducers.
This work outlines the methodology for producing such a unified method of comparing performance between any friction reducer chemical additives, both liquid and dry powder.
A 0.
5 inch stainless steel high-flow low-shear flow loop pumping at ranges between three and twenty gallons per minute was custom-built.
The loop uses a Coriolis flow meter, two absolute pressure transducers, and one differential pressure transducer to accurately determine the friction reducer additive performance in any given fluid by measuring pressure drop across a section of developed flow.
This paper utilizes over 400 in-house flow loop tests to establish a novel unified ranking system for the evaluation of friction reducers’ performance.
The ranking is independent of the type of friction reducer used and quality of water.
Produced waters, fresh water, treated produced waters, and synthetic waters were all used to validate the methodology and ranking system to create a unified criteria to compare performance of any friction reducers.
Tomson Technologies created a standardized metric for assessing and ranking friction reducer performance.
This standardization was achieved through the use of an unique performance scale comprised of the weighted average of the most important friction reduction parameters of a friction reducer in any produced water: (1) inversion time (InvT), (2) maximum percent friction reduction (Max% FR), (3) time to sustain maximum percent friction reduction (RetT@%Avg.
FRmax), and (4) the percent friction reduction at the end of 500 seconds (% FR@500s).
500 seconds is used because fluid during hydraulic fractures travels from the pumps to the reservoir in 500 or fewer seconds in almost all cases.
This scale is measured in a new unit called "Friction Reducer Units" (FRU), which ranges from 0 to 10.
FRU has been used to rank and correlate the performance of different classes of friction reducers in various types of waters, resulting in a comprehensive results database and is used to show applicability of the overall metric.

Related Results

Installation Analysis of Matterhorn Pipeline Replacement
Installation Analysis of Matterhorn Pipeline Replacement
Abstract The paper describes the installation analysis for the Matterhorn field pipeline replacement, located in water depths between 800-ft to 1200-ft in the Gul...
Tuning the Friction of Silicon Surfaces Using Nanopatterns at the Nanoscale
Tuning the Friction of Silicon Surfaces Using Nanopatterns at the Nanoscale
Friction and wear become significant at small scale lengths, particularly in MEMS/NEMS. Nanopatterns are regarded as a potential approach to solve these problems. In this paper, we...
Effects of the Physical Properties of Resins on Friction Performance
Effects of the Physical Properties of Resins on Friction Performance
<div class="section abstract"><div class="htmlview paragraph">The friction performance of a wet clutch for an automatic transmission (AT) depends on the interaction bet...
Comparative Study of Friction Models in High-Speed Machining of Titanium Alloys
Comparative Study of Friction Models in High-Speed Machining of Titanium Alloys
Friction has a significant impact on chip formation, so modeling it accurately is crucial in numerical cutting simulations. However, there is still controversy regarding the applic...
UPGRADED FRICTION MACHINE
UPGRADED FRICTION MACHINE
The study objective is to increase the information value, accuracy and reliability of the experimental assessment results of extreme pressure and antifriction properties of the tes...
Friction heat conduction and entransy of friction lining
Friction heat conduction and entransy of friction lining
PurposeThis paper aims to analyze the friction heat conduction and entransy of two friction linings in the high‐speed slide accident of a mine friction hoist.Design/methodology/app...
Experimental Investigation on Friction and Wear Performance of C/C Composite Finger Seal
Experimental Investigation on Friction and Wear Performance of C/C Composite Finger Seal
Abstract In order to find a good friction pair for the finger seal, the pin-on-disc friction tests matching the actual working conditions of finger seal are designed...

Back to Top