Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Eye Sensitivity in Soft Contact Lens Wearers
View through CrossRef
ABSTRACT
Purpose
To estimate the prevalence of self‐reported “sensitive eyes” (SEs) in soft contact lens (CL) wearers, evaluate the clinical characteristics of patients with SEs, and examine the effect of refitting them with silicone hydrogel lenses.
Methods
After self‐assessment, 2154 CL wearers were separated into SE and non‐SE patients. Demographics, biometric data, wearing time, symptoms, and signs were compared between the two populations. Sixty‐three SE patients were randomized into senofilcon A (senA) lenses and 65 into a non–senA arm (lotrafilcon B, omafilcon A, and balafilcon A lenses). The performance of senA lenses was compared against habitual and non‐senA lenses 2 weeks later.
Results
A total of 12.2% of CL wearers reported SEs with their habitual CLs. No significant differences were noticed between SE and non‐SE patients in sex, age, or refraction. The prevalence of dryness (43 vs 19%, p < 0.0001), irritation (25 vs 11%, p < 0.0001), redness (20 vs 6%, p < 0.0001), and stinging (6 vs 1%, p < 0.0001) was higher in SE patients. Average wearing time (13.0 vs 14.1 hours, p < 0.0001) was lower in this group. Limbal/bulbar hyperemia and corneal/conjunctival staining were not significantly different between the two populations. Senofilcon A increased the number of patients reporting no dryness (habitual vs senA, 20 vs 44%, p < 0.0003), irritation (22 vs 37%, p = 0.015), redness (52 vs 76%, p =0.009) and stinging (58 vs 77%, p = 0.012) but did not significantly affect clinical signs. Senofilcon A was significantly more efficient than non‐senA lenses in improving dryness (scale of 0 to 3: senA vs non‐senA, 0.64 vs 1.02, p = 0.0056), irritation (0.72 vs 1.16, p = 0.0015), and stinging (0.18 vs 0.53, p = 0.0049).
Conclusions
A substantial proportion of CL wearers report SEs with their habitual lenses. These patients are characterized by a high prevalence of additional symptoms, which are not reflected in clinical signs. Senofilcon A, or lenses with similar properties, may help reduce these symptoms in SE patients.
Title: Eye Sensitivity in Soft Contact Lens Wearers
Description:
ABSTRACT
Purpose
To estimate the prevalence of self‐reported “sensitive eyes” (SEs) in soft contact lens (CL) wearers, evaluate the clinical characteristics of patients with SEs, and examine the effect of refitting them with silicone hydrogel lenses.
Methods
After self‐assessment, 2154 CL wearers were separated into SE and non‐SE patients.
Demographics, biometric data, wearing time, symptoms, and signs were compared between the two populations.
Sixty‐three SE patients were randomized into senofilcon A (senA) lenses and 65 into a non–senA arm (lotrafilcon B, omafilcon A, and balafilcon A lenses).
The performance of senA lenses was compared against habitual and non‐senA lenses 2 weeks later.
Results
A total of 12.
2% of CL wearers reported SEs with their habitual CLs.
No significant differences were noticed between SE and non‐SE patients in sex, age, or refraction.
The prevalence of dryness (43 vs 19%, p < 0.
0001), irritation (25 vs 11%, p < 0.
0001), redness (20 vs 6%, p < 0.
0001), and stinging (6 vs 1%, p < 0.
0001) was higher in SE patients.
Average wearing time (13.
0 vs 14.
1 hours, p < 0.
0001) was lower in this group.
Limbal/bulbar hyperemia and corneal/conjunctival staining were not significantly different between the two populations.
Senofilcon A increased the number of patients reporting no dryness (habitual vs senA, 20 vs 44%, p < 0.
0003), irritation (22 vs 37%, p = 0.
015), redness (52 vs 76%, p =0.
009) and stinging (58 vs 77%, p = 0.
012) but did not significantly affect clinical signs.
Senofilcon A was significantly more efficient than non‐senA lenses in improving dryness (scale of 0 to 3: senA vs non‐senA, 0.
64 vs 1.
02, p = 0.
0056), irritation (0.
72 vs 1.
16, p = 0.
0015), and stinging (0.
18 vs 0.
53, p = 0.
0049).
Conclusions
A substantial proportion of CL wearers report SEs with their habitual lenses.
These patients are characterized by a high prevalence of additional symptoms, which are not reflected in clinical signs.
Senofilcon A, or lenses with similar properties, may help reduce these symptoms in SE patients.
Related Results
Attitudes of Successful Contact Lens Wearers Toward Refractive Surgery
Attitudes of Successful Contact Lens Wearers Toward Refractive Surgery
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Traditionally, spectacle wearers and contact lens failures have been the patient population targeted for refractive surgery. We surveyed successful c...
A Randomized Trial on the Benefits of Refitting Symptomatic Contact Lens Wearers with Daily Disposable Lenses
A Randomized Trial on the Benefits of Refitting Symptomatic Contact Lens Wearers with Daily Disposable Lenses
Backgraund/objetive: Contact lens discomfort (CLD) is a prevalent issue affecting up to 50% of wearers and contributes to discontinuation in approximately 30% of cases. This study ...
Periodontal, oral and denture hygiene status of removable partial denture wearers and non-denture wearers
Periodontal, oral and denture hygiene status of removable partial denture wearers and non-denture wearers
The use of dentures is believed to worsen oral health if not properly maintained. Good oral hygiene regime and regular dental visits can promote oral health and reduce the risk of ...
Between the Classes of Soft Open Sets and Soft Omega Open Sets
Between the Classes of Soft Open Sets and Soft Omega Open Sets
In this paper, we define the class of soft ω0-open sets. We show that this class forms a soft topology that is strictly between the classes of soft open sets and soft ω-open sets, ...
Weaker Forms of Soft Regular and Soft T2 Soft Topological Spaces
Weaker Forms of Soft Regular and Soft T2 Soft Topological Spaces
Soft ω-local indiscreetness as a weaker form of both soft local countability and soft local indiscreetness is introduced. Then soft ω-regularity as a weaker form of both soft regul...
Penggunaan Lensa Kontak untuk Astigmatisma Paska Keratoplasti
Penggunaan Lensa Kontak untuk Astigmatisma Paska Keratoplasti
Background: Fitting Contact Lenses for post penetrating keratoplasty patiens can be a great challenges to contact lens practitioner. Despite advances in surgical techniques for pen...
Psihološke odrednice sindroma suhog oka
Psihološke odrednice sindroma suhog oka
Introduction: Dry eye disease (DED) is a worldwide public health problem that may cause serious consequences for the patient's health. The etiology of the disease is multifactorial...
Brief vs Thong Hygiene in Obstetrics and Gynecology (B-THONG): A Survey Study [1J]
Brief vs Thong Hygiene in Obstetrics and Gynecology (B-THONG): A Survey Study [1J]
INTRODUCTION:
The goal of this study is to determine if thong underwear use is associated with a higher report of urinary tract (UTI) or vaginal infections (bacterial v...

