Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Eye Sensitivity in Soft Contact Lens Wearers
View through CrossRef
ABSTRACT
Purpose
To estimate the prevalence of self‐reported “sensitive eyes” (SEs) in soft contact lens (CL) wearers, evaluate the clinical characteristics of patients with SEs, and examine the effect of refitting them with silicone hydrogel lenses.
Methods
After self‐assessment, 2154 CL wearers were separated into SE and non‐SE patients. Demographics, biometric data, wearing time, symptoms, and signs were compared between the two populations. Sixty‐three SE patients were randomized into senofilcon A (senA) lenses and 65 into a non–senA arm (lotrafilcon B, omafilcon A, and balafilcon A lenses). The performance of senA lenses was compared against habitual and non‐senA lenses 2 weeks later.
Results
A total of 12.2% of CL wearers reported SEs with their habitual CLs. No significant differences were noticed between SE and non‐SE patients in sex, age, or refraction. The prevalence of dryness (43 vs 19%, p < 0.0001), irritation (25 vs 11%, p < 0.0001), redness (20 vs 6%, p < 0.0001), and stinging (6 vs 1%, p < 0.0001) was higher in SE patients. Average wearing time (13.0 vs 14.1 hours, p < 0.0001) was lower in this group. Limbal/bulbar hyperemia and corneal/conjunctival staining were not significantly different between the two populations. Senofilcon A increased the number of patients reporting no dryness (habitual vs senA, 20 vs 44%, p < 0.0003), irritation (22 vs 37%, p = 0.015), redness (52 vs 76%, p =0.009) and stinging (58 vs 77%, p = 0.012) but did not significantly affect clinical signs. Senofilcon A was significantly more efficient than non‐senA lenses in improving dryness (scale of 0 to 3: senA vs non‐senA, 0.64 vs 1.02, p = 0.0056), irritation (0.72 vs 1.16, p = 0.0015), and stinging (0.18 vs 0.53, p = 0.0049).
Conclusions
A substantial proportion of CL wearers report SEs with their habitual lenses. These patients are characterized by a high prevalence of additional symptoms, which are not reflected in clinical signs. Senofilcon A, or lenses with similar properties, may help reduce these symptoms in SE patients.
Title: Eye Sensitivity in Soft Contact Lens Wearers
Description:
ABSTRACT
Purpose
To estimate the prevalence of self‐reported “sensitive eyes” (SEs) in soft contact lens (CL) wearers, evaluate the clinical characteristics of patients with SEs, and examine the effect of refitting them with silicone hydrogel lenses.
Methods
After self‐assessment, 2154 CL wearers were separated into SE and non‐SE patients.
Demographics, biometric data, wearing time, symptoms, and signs were compared between the two populations.
Sixty‐three SE patients were randomized into senofilcon A (senA) lenses and 65 into a non–senA arm (lotrafilcon B, omafilcon A, and balafilcon A lenses).
The performance of senA lenses was compared against habitual and non‐senA lenses 2 weeks later.
Results
A total of 12.
2% of CL wearers reported SEs with their habitual CLs.
No significant differences were noticed between SE and non‐SE patients in sex, age, or refraction.
The prevalence of dryness (43 vs 19%, p < 0.
0001), irritation (25 vs 11%, p < 0.
0001), redness (20 vs 6%, p < 0.
0001), and stinging (6 vs 1%, p < 0.
0001) was higher in SE patients.
Average wearing time (13.
0 vs 14.
1 hours, p < 0.
0001) was lower in this group.
Limbal/bulbar hyperemia and corneal/conjunctival staining were not significantly different between the two populations.
Senofilcon A increased the number of patients reporting no dryness (habitual vs senA, 20 vs 44%, p < 0.
0003), irritation (22 vs 37%, p = 0.
015), redness (52 vs 76%, p =0.
009) and stinging (58 vs 77%, p = 0.
012) but did not significantly affect clinical signs.
Senofilcon A was significantly more efficient than non‐senA lenses in improving dryness (scale of 0 to 3: senA vs non‐senA, 0.
64 vs 1.
02, p = 0.
0056), irritation (0.
72 vs 1.
16, p = 0.
0015), and stinging (0.
18 vs 0.
53, p = 0.
0049).
Conclusions
A substantial proportion of CL wearers report SEs with their habitual lenses.
These patients are characterized by a high prevalence of additional symptoms, which are not reflected in clinical signs.
Senofilcon A, or lenses with similar properties, may help reduce these symptoms in SE patients.
Related Results
Comparative Clinical Performance of Rigid versus Soft Hyper Dk Contact Lenses Used for Continuous Wear
Comparative Clinical Performance of Rigid versus Soft Hyper Dk Contact Lenses Used for Continuous Wear
ABSTRACT
Purpose.
The purpose of this study is to investigate the comparative clinical performance of two hyper Dk contac...
Preocular Tear Film Characteristics of Nonwearers and Soft Contact Lens Wearers
Preocular Tear Film Characteristics of Nonwearers and Soft Contact Lens Wearers
ABSTRACT:
The aims of the current investigation were to: (1) characterize (structure, volume, and stability) the preocular tear film of contact lens wearers and n...
Attitudes of Successful Contact Lens Wearers Toward Refractive Surgery
Attitudes of Successful Contact Lens Wearers Toward Refractive Surgery
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Traditionally, spectacle wearers and contact lens failures have been the patient population targeted for refractive surgery. We surveyed successful c...
A Randomized Trial on the Benefits of Refitting Symptomatic Contact Lens Wearers with Daily Disposable Lenses
A Randomized Trial on the Benefits of Refitting Symptomatic Contact Lens Wearers with Daily Disposable Lenses
Backgraund/objetive: Contact lens discomfort (CLD) is a prevalent issue affecting up to 50% of wearers and contributes to discontinuation in approximately 30% of cases. This study ...
Periodontal, oral and denture hygiene status of removable partial denture wearers and non-denture wearers
Periodontal, oral and denture hygiene status of removable partial denture wearers and non-denture wearers
The use of dentures is believed to worsen oral health if not properly maintained. Good oral hygiene regime and regular dental visits can promote oral health and reduce the risk of ...
<b>Association Between Topical Retinol Use and Contact Lens Intolerance Among Young Adults</b>
<b>Association Between Topical Retinol Use and Contact Lens Intolerance Among Young Adults</b>
Background: Topical retinol is commonly used by young adults for acne, pigmentation, and skin rejuvenation, while contact lens wear depends on a stable tear film and healthy ocular...
Between the Classes of Soft Open Sets and Soft Omega Open Sets
Between the Classes of Soft Open Sets and Soft Omega Open Sets
In this paper, we define the class of soft ω0-open sets. We show that this class forms a soft topology that is strictly between the classes of soft open sets and soft ω-open sets, ...
Weaker Forms of Soft Regular and Soft T2 Soft Topological Spaces
Weaker Forms of Soft Regular and Soft T2 Soft Topological Spaces
Soft ω-local indiscreetness as a weaker form of both soft local countability and soft local indiscreetness is introduced. Then soft ω-regularity as a weaker form of both soft regul...

