Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Bishop Porfiry (Ouspensky) and the Problem of the Unity of the Russian and Coptic Orthodox Churches
View through CrossRef
Статья посвящена изучению вопроса единства Русской и Коптской Православных Церквей в XIX в. и его актуальности в настоящее время. Епископ Порфирий (Успенский) имел большой интерес к изучению истории христианства и стремление восстановить единство Церквей. Совместно с Патриархом Александрийской Греко-Православной Церкви Калинником Олимпийским епископ Порфирий разработал проект восстановления христианского единства. При встрече двух иерархов в Константинополе в 1859 г. Патриарх был готов оставить Александрийский престол в пользу Патриарха Александрийского Папы Кириллоса (Кирилла) IV, но при одном условии - Коптская Церковь должна служить по византийской богослужебной практике, а не по александрийской коптской. Но это предложение было отвергнуто. Епископ Порфирий также не согласился с этим. В итоге проект владыки Порфирия и Патриарха Калинника не был осуществлён, хотя первому удалось убедить в его значимости не только Патриарха Калинника, но и настоятеля Синайского монастыря святой Екатерины Кирилла III.
The article is devoted to the study of the question of the unity of the Russian and Coptic Orthodox Churches in the 19th century and its relevance at the present time. Bishop Porfiry (Ouspensky) had a great interest in the study of the history of Christianity and a desire to restore the unity of the Churches. Together with the Greek-Orthodox Patriarch of Alexandria, Kalinnik of Olympia, Bishop Porfiry developed a project to restore Christian unity. When the two hierarchs met in Constantinople in 1859, the Patriarch was prepared to resign the Alexandrian episcopal chairin favour of Pope Kyrillos (Cyril) IV, Patriarch of Alexandria, but on one condition - the Coptic Church should serve according to Byzantine liturgical practice and not the Coptic Church of Alexandria. But this proposal was rejected. Bishop Porfiry did not agree to this either. As a result, the project of Bishop Porfiry and Patriarch Kalinnik was not implemented, although the former succeeded in convincing not only Patriarch Kalinnik, but also Cyril III, abbot of the Sinai monastery of St Catherine the Great, of its importance.
Title: Bishop Porfiry (Ouspensky) and the Problem of the Unity of the Russian and Coptic Orthodox Churches
Description:
Статья посвящена изучению вопроса единства Русской и Коптской Православных Церквей в XIX в.
и его актуальности в настоящее время.
Епископ Порфирий (Успенский) имел большой интерес к изучению истории христианства и стремление восстановить единство Церквей.
Совместно с Патриархом Александрийской Греко-Православной Церкви Калинником Олимпийским епископ Порфирий разработал проект восстановления христианского единства.
При встрече двух иерархов в Константинополе в 1859 г.
Патриарх был готов оставить Александрийский престол в пользу Патриарха Александрийского Папы Кириллоса (Кирилла) IV, но при одном условии - Коптская Церковь должна служить по византийской богослужебной практике, а не по александрийской коптской.
Но это предложение было отвергнуто.
Епископ Порфирий также не согласился с этим.
В итоге проект владыки Порфирия и Патриарха Калинника не был осуществлён, хотя первому удалось убедить в его значимости не только Патриарха Калинника, но и настоятеля Синайского монастыря святой Екатерины Кирилла III.
The article is devoted to the study of the question of the unity of the Russian and Coptic Orthodox Churches in the 19th century and its relevance at the present time.
Bishop Porfiry (Ouspensky) had a great interest in the study of the history of Christianity and a desire to restore the unity of the Churches.
Together with the Greek-Orthodox Patriarch of Alexandria, Kalinnik of Olympia, Bishop Porfiry developed a project to restore Christian unity.
When the two hierarchs met in Constantinople in 1859, the Patriarch was prepared to resign the Alexandrian episcopal chairin favour of Pope Kyrillos (Cyril) IV, Patriarch of Alexandria, but on one condition - the Coptic Church should serve according to Byzantine liturgical practice and not the Coptic Church of Alexandria.
But this proposal was rejected.
Bishop Porfiry did not agree to this either.
As a result, the project of Bishop Porfiry and Patriarch Kalinnik was not implemented, although the former succeeded in convincing not only Patriarch Kalinnik, but also Cyril III, abbot of the Sinai monastery of St Catherine the Great, of its importance.
Related Results
Middelalderlige kirkelader i Danmark
Middelalderlige kirkelader i Danmark
Medieval Church Barns in DenmarkThe subject of this article is medieval church barns within the area of present-day Denmark. A church barn (or tithe barn) is a building erected nea...
Artificial laughter: V. Pelevin’s "iPhuck 10"
Artificial laughter: V. Pelevin’s "iPhuck 10"
The article is an attempt at studying the laughter of AI in V. Pelevin’s novel "iPhuck 10"(2017). Porfiry Petrovich’s laughter is examined from two angles, from its semantics and f...
Fra det prangende til det ydmyge
Fra det prangende til det ydmyge
From the ostentatious to the humble Towerless medieval churches in Denmark
This article investigates a special category of medieval church – those without towers. The Danish conce...
Iøjnefaldende arkitektur – Nordens middelalderlige rundkirker
Iøjnefaldende arkitektur – Nordens middelalderlige rundkirker
Conspicuous architecture. Medieval round churches in ScandinaviaThe aim of this article is partly to argue why round churches were built and partly to present an updated overview o...
Women in Australian Politics: Maintaining the Rage against the Political Machine
Women in Australian Politics: Maintaining the Rage against the Political Machine
Women in federal politics are under-represented today and always have been. At no time in the history of the federal parliament have women achieved equal representation with men. T...
P.D. Ouspensky as a Russian Follower of W. James and His Classification of the “Mystical”
P.D. Ouspensky as a Russian Follower of W. James and His Classification of the “Mystical”
This article examines one of the least studied representatives of Russian pre-revolutionary philosophy, P.D. Ouspensky. To this day, the legacy of this unusual, original thinker re...
The Bishop Tuff, California: New Insights into Magmatic Timescales and Processes from Micro-Analytical Approaches
The Bishop Tuff, California: New Insights into Magmatic Timescales and Processes from Micro-Analytical Approaches
<p>The Bishop Tuff is the product of one of the largest eruptions on Earth in the last 1 Myr. This thesis studies the Bishop Tuff in order to better understand the nature of ...
The Buddhist Trace in the Mysticism and Philosophy of G. I. Gurdjieff and P. D. Ouspensky
The Buddhist Trace in the Mysticism and Philosophy of G. I. Gurdjieff and P. D. Ouspensky
Introduction. This article analyzes the anthropological aspects of the teachings of the G. I. Gurdjieff and the Russian philosopher P. D. Ouspensky. Specifically, it examines the f...

