Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Development of instruments for DIVAYANA evaluation model

View through CrossRef
The purpose of this research showed a valid DIVAYANA evaluation model instruments were used to evaluate the implementation of e-learning. This research approach was the development of evaluation instruments. The evaluation instruments developed were in the form of interview guides and questionnaires. The interview guidelines that resulted were related to several DIVAYANA evaluation components, included: the Description component, Input component, Verification component, and Yack component. Questionnaires were generated on several DIVAYANA evaluation components, included: the Verification component, Action component, and Yack component. The subjects involved in the content validity test of the interview guidelines were two experts, including an informatics education expert and an educational evaluation expert. The content validity tests of questionnaires were conducted by six experts, including three education evaluation experts and three informatics education experts. The content validity calculation process of the interview guidelines used the Gregory formula, while the content validity of the questionnaires used Lawshe’s CVR formula. The content validity average of interview guidelines on the Description, Input, Verification, and Yack components was 0.882 so it was included in the very good category. The content validity average of questionnaires on the Verification, Action, and Yack components was 0.774 so it was in a good category. The implication of this research is the realization of valid measuring instruments that can be used in evaluating the implementation of e-learning.
Title: Development of instruments for DIVAYANA evaluation model
Description:
The purpose of this research showed a valid DIVAYANA evaluation model instruments were used to evaluate the implementation of e-learning.
This research approach was the development of evaluation instruments.
The evaluation instruments developed were in the form of interview guides and questionnaires.
The interview guidelines that resulted were related to several DIVAYANA evaluation components, included: the Description component, Input component, Verification component, and Yack component.
Questionnaires were generated on several DIVAYANA evaluation components, included: the Verification component, Action component, and Yack component.
The subjects involved in the content validity test of the interview guidelines were two experts, including an informatics education expert and an educational evaluation expert.
The content validity tests of questionnaires were conducted by six experts, including three education evaluation experts and three informatics education experts.
The content validity calculation process of the interview guidelines used the Gregory formula, while the content validity of the questionnaires used Lawshe’s CVR formula.
The content validity average of interview guidelines on the Description, Input, Verification, and Yack components was 0.
882 so it was included in the very good category.
The content validity average of questionnaires on the Verification, Action, and Yack components was 0.
774 so it was in a good category.
The implication of this research is the realization of valid measuring instruments that can be used in evaluating the implementation of e-learning.

Related Results

Utilization of DIVAYANA Formula in Evaluating of Suitable Platforms for Online Learning in the Social Distancing
Utilization of DIVAYANA Formula in Evaluating of Suitable Platforms for Online Learning in the Social Distancing
The selection of a suitable platform to facilitate online learning in <em>social distancing</em> becomes a very important thing to maintain the quality and smoothness o...
Qualitative Data Requirements in the Divayana Evaluation Model
Qualitative Data Requirements in the Divayana Evaluation Model
The need for qualitative data to support the evaluation process using the DIVAYANA (Description-Input-Verification-Action-Yack-Analysis-Nominate-Actualization) evaluation model is ...
The simulation of divayana formula calculation to determine the priority of recommendation in evaluation activities
The simulation of divayana formula calculation to determine the priority of recommendation in evaluation activities
Abstract Evaluation activities are not carried out to determine whether to pass or not the program being evaluated. Evaluation activities tend to provide recommendat...
DIVAYANA formula for determining priority ranking the recommendations in evaluation applications
DIVAYANA formula for determining priority ranking the recommendations in evaluation applications
Abstract Determination of appropriate recommendations through an evaluation application greatly affects the quality of decisions resulting from evaluation activities...
Aplikasi DIVAYANA Berbasis Ketimpangan Asuri-Daiwi Sampad Sebagai Alat Evaluasi Keefektifan Flipped Learning
Aplikasi DIVAYANA Berbasis Ketimpangan Asuri-Daiwi Sampad Sebagai Alat Evaluasi Keefektifan Flipped Learning
Keefektifan aplikasi evaluasi yang digunakan untuk menentukan skor ketimpangan positif dan negatif dalam pelaksanaan flipped learning sangat penting untuk diketahui. Skor ketimpang...
User Interface Design of the JOFF Evaluation Application as a Derivative of DIVAYANA Evaluation Model
User Interface Design of the JOFF Evaluation Application as a Derivative of DIVAYANA Evaluation Model
The user interface design of an application is not limited to applications in the field of informatics, but also applies to various fields that utilize information technology. This...
Non-Recommended Publishing Lists: Strategies for Detecting Deceitful Journals
Non-Recommended Publishing Lists: Strategies for Detecting Deceitful Journals
Abstract The rapid growth of open access publishing (OAP) has significantly improved the accessibility and dissemination of scientific knowledge. However, this expansion has also c...

Back to Top