Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

From Vitruvius to the Science Of Drawing Daniele Barbaro’s Concept of “Scaenographia”

View through CrossRef
Daniele Barbaro’s treatise on perspective is one of the most authoritative technical-scientific sources of the sixteenth century. Although largely based on the unpublished work of Piero della Francesca, the treatise had the precise and original purpose of filling a gap in the Vitruvian text about the contents of the so-called ‘scaenographia’, a discipline based on optical geometry of which Vitruvius provided only meagre and sibylline words. The subdivision of the treatise, examined here into the individual parts that constitute it, follows a clearly Vitruvian structure, with the first three parts dedicated to ichnographia (perspective drawing of plans), orthographaia (perspective drawing of solid bodies) and scaenographia (perspective drawing of the buildings and their ornaments), and with two other parts specifically dedicated to the measurements of the human body and to the drawing of the planisphere, themes treated by Vitruvius respectively in the third and ninth books of De architectura. In this sense, La pratica della perspettiva, published in 1568, should be considered as an integral text of the most authoritative commentary on Vitruvius’ I Dieci libri dell’architettura, published in 1556 and 1567.
Title: From Vitruvius to the Science Of Drawing Daniele Barbaro’s Concept of “Scaenographia”
Description:
Daniele Barbaro’s treatise on perspective is one of the most authoritative technical-scientific sources of the sixteenth century.
Although largely based on the unpublished work of Piero della Francesca, the treatise had the precise and original purpose of filling a gap in the Vitruvian text about the contents of the so-called ‘scaenographia’, a discipline based on optical geometry of which Vitruvius provided only meagre and sibylline words.
The subdivision of the treatise, examined here into the individual parts that constitute it, follows a clearly Vitruvian structure, with the first three parts dedicated to ichnographia (perspective drawing of plans), orthographaia (perspective drawing of solid bodies) and scaenographia (perspective drawing of the buildings and their ornaments), and with two other parts specifically dedicated to the measurements of the human body and to the drawing of the planisphere, themes treated by Vitruvius respectively in the third and ninth books of De architectura.
In this sense, La pratica della perspettiva, published in 1568, should be considered as an integral text of the most authoritative commentary on Vitruvius’ I Dieci libri dell’architettura, published in 1556 and 1567.

Related Results

Introduzione. La prospettiva come tema vitruviano = Introduction. Perspective as a Vitruvian Theme
Introduzione. La prospettiva come tema vitruviano = Introduction. Perspective as a Vitruvian Theme
Con la diffusione della prospettiva lineare, l’architettura divenne uno dei principali temi di studio degli artisti rinascimentali. La necessità di rappresentare architetture credi...
Enacting the social relations of science: historical (anti-)boundary-work of Danish science journalist Børge Michelsen
Enacting the social relations of science: historical (anti-)boundary-work of Danish science journalist Børge Michelsen
This article investigates the writings of Danish science journalist Børge Michelsen from 1939 to 1956. As part of the international social relations of science movement in the peri...
Science Communication as a Boundary Space: An Interactive Installation about the Social Responsibility of Science
Science Communication as a Boundary Space: An Interactive Installation about the Social Responsibility of Science
Science communication has traditionally been seen as a means of crossing the boundary of science: moving scientific knowledge into the public. This paper presents an alternative un...
The rupture as a drawing-in of experience
The rupture as a drawing-in of experience
Abstract The rupture as a drawing-in of experience constructs perspectives on architectural education, as an act of architectural discourse proper in order that architectural educa...
What’s science? Where’s science? Science journalism in German print media
What’s science? Where’s science? Science journalism in German print media
This article examines the current state of science coverage in German print media. It deals with the following questions: (1) how the main characteristics of science journalism can...
Science, Values, and the Value of Science
Science, Values, and the Value of Science
Protagonists in the so-called Science Wars differ most markedly in their views about the role of values in science and what makes science valuable. Scientists and philosophers of s...
Beyond Science Wars Redux: Feminist Philosophy of Science as Trustworthy Science Criticism
Beyond Science Wars Redux: Feminist Philosophy of Science as Trustworthy Science Criticism
Bruno Latour is not the only scholar to reflect on his earlier contributions to science studies with some regret and resolve over climate skepticism and science denialism. Given th...
Digital cosmopoiesis in architectural pedagogy: An analysis through Frascari
Digital cosmopoiesis in architectural pedagogy: An analysis through Frascari
Abstract This article derives from three observations of architectural drawing: the current ubiquitousness of digitization, the ongoing disputation of digitization in architectural...

Back to Top