Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Multimodal Ethnography

View through CrossRef
This entry foregrounds how multimodality has come to signal a recalibration of ethnography within (and beyond) anthropology. Multimodality encourages a move toward the extra-textual to more faithfully represent the embodied nature of ethnographic research while opening new strategies to effectively move between abstraction, affect, and analysis. Multimodality also points toward an aspiration to initiate interdisciplinary conversation and to engage with broader publics. Films, art installations, websites, photo essays, and theater performances, to name a few types of multimodal output, invite a different and broader spectatorship that text-based ethnographic exegesis alone can muster. Finally, multimodality signals, for many, a reinvigorated interest in collaborative approaches to producing knowledge that harken to previous disciplinary desires (and projects) to create a shared ethnography through the sensuous and imaginative potentials of the camera. Multimodality anticipates, in this sense, the proliferation of digital tools and platforms that invite opportunities for shared ethnographic storytelling even as it doesn’t reduce its potential to technologically determined approaches and methodologies. In foregrounding the multimodal potentials of ethnography, this entry brackets a detailed discussion of how multimodality has been developed in communication studies, semiotics, and sociolinguistics as a way to understand and analyze multiple and concurrent modes of signification. It also steers clear of a discussion regarding the digital humanities, although it is important to note that initiatives under the banner of digital humanities have greatly impacted publishing in ways that have benefitted multimodal ethnography. The entry offers, rather, an introduction to multimodality as an ethnographic approach, output, and digital curatorial practice, by drawing attention to creative scholarship that moves beyond logocentric scholarly methods and modes of production—that is, approaches that take an external reference as an epistemological starting point—and toward multisensory engagements with knowing and being.
Title: Multimodal Ethnography
Description:
This entry foregrounds how multimodality has come to signal a recalibration of ethnography within (and beyond) anthropology.
Multimodality encourages a move toward the extra-textual to more faithfully represent the embodied nature of ethnographic research while opening new strategies to effectively move between abstraction, affect, and analysis.
Multimodality also points toward an aspiration to initiate interdisciplinary conversation and to engage with broader publics.
Films, art installations, websites, photo essays, and theater performances, to name a few types of multimodal output, invite a different and broader spectatorship that text-based ethnographic exegesis alone can muster.
Finally, multimodality signals, for many, a reinvigorated interest in collaborative approaches to producing knowledge that harken to previous disciplinary desires (and projects) to create a shared ethnography through the sensuous and imaginative potentials of the camera.
Multimodality anticipates, in this sense, the proliferation of digital tools and platforms that invite opportunities for shared ethnographic storytelling even as it doesn’t reduce its potential to technologically determined approaches and methodologies.
In foregrounding the multimodal potentials of ethnography, this entry brackets a detailed discussion of how multimodality has been developed in communication studies, semiotics, and sociolinguistics as a way to understand and analyze multiple and concurrent modes of signification.
It also steers clear of a discussion regarding the digital humanities, although it is important to note that initiatives under the banner of digital humanities have greatly impacted publishing in ways that have benefitted multimodal ethnography.
The entry offers, rather, an introduction to multimodality as an ethnographic approach, output, and digital curatorial practice, by drawing attention to creative scholarship that moves beyond logocentric scholarly methods and modes of production—that is, approaches that take an external reference as an epistemological starting point—and toward multisensory engagements with knowing and being.

Related Results

Multimodal Emotion Recognition and Human Computer Interaction for AI-Driven Mental Health Support (Preprint)
Multimodal Emotion Recognition and Human Computer Interaction for AI-Driven Mental Health Support (Preprint)
BACKGROUND Mental health has become one of the most urgent global health issues of the twenty-first century. The World Health Organization (WHO) reports tha...
Literasi Multimodal: Teori, Desain, dan Aplikasi
Literasi Multimodal: Teori, Desain, dan Aplikasi
Buku ini bertujuan untuk pengembangan strategi dan model paket pelajaran atau mata kuliah dengan menawarkan contoh-contoh strategi instruksional yang memiliki landasan teori dan be...
Disclosing the Ethnographic Self
Disclosing the Ethnographic Self
We are our own subjects. How our subjectivity becomes entangled in the lives of others is and has always been our topic. (Denzin 27)This article reflects on the process of disclosi...
AFR-BERT: Attention-based mechanism feature relevance fusion multimodal sentiment analysis model
AFR-BERT: Attention-based mechanism feature relevance fusion multimodal sentiment analysis model
Multimodal sentiment analysis is an essential task in natural language processing which refers to the fact that machines can analyze and recognize emotions through logical reasonin...
DESIGNING A MULTIMODAL TRANSPORT NETWORK
DESIGNING A MULTIMODAL TRANSPORT NETWORK
Objective: To create a methodology for designing a multimodal transport network under various scenarios of socioeconomic development of the Russian Federation and its regions which...

Back to Top