Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Vanguards of Democracy: Juries as Forerunners of Representative Government
View through CrossRef
Juries are the most diverse institution of government. Due to the random selection of members, ease of access, and procedural rights to challenge the exclusion of protected classes, juries reflect the diversity of America far better than legislatures, courts, the bar, and virtually every other civic institution. This Article aims to do two things. First, document how juries have become more diverse along the lines of income, gender, and race; and how each of these groups had to surmount the powers that be to take their place in American jury boxes. Second, demonstrate how juries allowed marginalized groups in each of these categories to exercise political power sooner and more solidly than other institutions of government. As a result, current declines in the use of jury trials mean less-representative decision-makers will have a larger role in our jurisprudence.
Title: Vanguards of Democracy: Juries as Forerunners of Representative Government
Description:
Juries are the most diverse institution of government.
Due to the random selection of members, ease of access, and procedural rights to challenge the exclusion of protected classes, juries reflect the diversity of America far better than legislatures, courts, the bar, and virtually every other civic institution.
This Article aims to do two things.
First, document how juries have become more diverse along the lines of income, gender, and race; and how each of these groups had to surmount the powers that be to take their place in American jury boxes.
Second, demonstrate how juries allowed marginalized groups in each of these categories to exercise political power sooner and more solidly than other institutions of government.
As a result, current declines in the use of jury trials mean less-representative decision-makers will have a larger role in our jurisprudence.
Related Results
Juries are Different: Racial and Ethnic Differences in Trust Across Legal Institutions
Juries are Different: Racial and Ethnic Differences in Trust Across Legal Institutions
Objective: We explored how White, Black, and Hispanic people rated their trust in juries, whether these patterns differed from trust in courts, what potential mechanisms might help...
The Informed Jury
The Informed Jury
The right to a criminal jury trial is a constitutional disappointment. Cases almost never make it to a jury because of plea bargaining. In the few cases that do, the jury is relega...
What Causes Democracy?
What Causes Democracy?
In pointing to a definition of “democracy,” there is no single concept of the term on which all scholars agree. The question of “what a democracy is … and is not,” to borrow the ti...
Casting Aspersions in Patent Trials
Casting Aspersions in Patent Trials
Bad actors in patent litigation can face serious consequences. Infringers who are found to “willfully” infringe may be subject to trebled damages. Patentees who assert weak claims...
VARIABILITY OF MODERN DEMOCRACY: A BRIEF ANALYSIS
VARIABILITY OF MODERN DEMOCRACY: A BRIEF ANALYSIS
It is noted that at present, Ukraine, due to the actualization of the search for a future path in the conditions of uncertainty of the existential situation, has once again found i...
Kaleidoscopic Leadership in Contemporary Democracies
Kaleidoscopic Leadership in Contemporary Democracies
Democratic theory and leadership studies are closely related. Yet, the idea of democratic leadership is inherently paradoxical. Whereas the concept of democracy rests on the idea o...

