Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Machine learning approach to reconstruct fog history for solar parks
View through CrossRef
Fog or low stratus clouds can reduce solar power production significantly. A not forecasted fog event can lead to huge power misses, even at country scale and thus lead to high imbalance prices in energy trading. This presents a financial risk to the solar park owner, who bears the balancing responsibility in the European power markets. Reducing this risk makes solar investments financially more interesting and thus can help for the achievement of a climate neutral Europe. More accurate solar forecasts can help to achieve this goal, and for this an accurate historical data of fog occurrence at the park level is important. It is not straightforward to get this information for several reasons: Fog can be a very local phenomenon, and observations only rarely exist close to solar parks. Reanalysis data such as ERA5 do not have visibility information and numerical weather prediction models (NWP) often poorly predict fog, in part because their grid is too large to model fog formation.  In this study, we will present a machine learning model to reconstruct fog history at solar park level. To build our model we use solar parks, which have weather observation in close vicinity. The weather observation will give us information about the true fog events and thus the target data, i.e. the data we want to predict. We use visibility and low cloud measurements from observation stations from the German weather operator DWD, Deutscher Wetterdienst. Fog was defined to include fog and mist (visibility < 5km) and to low clouds, which are lower than 2 km. To train the model, we will use reanalysis data from ECMWF (ERA5) and solar production. Part of the work was to find the best features to represent fog formation. We used data such as cloud cover, temperature (at surface and gradients) and humidity. Then we trained a classifier to predict the fog history at park level. This model showed good improvements of fog detection compared to NWP fog forecast. Our model achieved an accuracy of 94% and Brier score of 0.05, while the NWP fog forecast of the closest grid point to the solar park shows respective values of 86% and 0.17. This shows that our model was able to produce accurate historical fog data at the solar park level.
Title: Machine learning approach to reconstruct fog history for solar parks
Description:
Fog or low stratus clouds can reduce solar power production significantly.
A not forecasted fog event can lead to huge power misses, even at country scale and thus lead to high imbalance prices in energy trading.
This presents a financial risk to the solar park owner, who bears the balancing responsibility in the European power markets.
Reducing this risk makes solar investments financially more interesting and thus can help for the achievement of a climate neutral Europe.
More accurate solar forecasts can help to achieve this goal, and for this an accurate historical data of fog occurrence at the park level is important.
It is not straightforward to get this information for several reasons: Fog can be a very local phenomenon, and observations only rarely exist close to solar parks.
Reanalysis data such as ERA5 do not have visibility information and numerical weather prediction models (NWP) often poorly predict fog, in part because their grid is too large to model fog formation.
 In this study, we will present a machine learning model to reconstruct fog history at solar park level.
To build our model we use solar parks, which have weather observation in close vicinity.
The weather observation will give us information about the true fog events and thus the target data, i.
e.
the data we want to predict.
We use visibility and low cloud measurements from observation stations from the German weather operator DWD, Deutscher Wetterdienst.
Fog was defined to include fog and mist (visibility < 5km) and to low clouds, which are lower than 2 km.
To train the model, we will use reanalysis data from ECMWF (ERA5) and solar production.
Part of the work was to find the best features to represent fog formation.
We used data such as cloud cover, temperature (at surface and gradients) and humidity.
Then we trained a classifier to predict the fog history at park level.
This model showed good improvements of fog detection compared to NWP fog forecast.
Our model achieved an accuracy of 94% and Brier score of 0.
05, while the NWP fog forecast of the closest grid point to the solar park shows respective values of 86% and 0.
17.
This shows that our model was able to produce accurate historical fog data at the solar park level.
Related Results
Leveraging Integrated Water Vapor derived from GPS for fog detection and fog characteristics analysis
Leveraging Integrated Water Vapor derived from GPS for fog detection and fog characteristics analysis
This study characterizes the physical processes involved in fog formation through an analysis of Integrated Water Vapor (IWV) measured via GPS, combined with in situ meteorological...
Life-cycle analysis of fog types in the Inn Valley, Austria
Life-cycle analysis of fog types in the Inn Valley, Austria
Fog and low stratus are a widespread phenomena worldwide, influencing the climate system and human activities. They reflect sunlight, reducing incoming solar radiation, yet also tr...
Dense Fog Burst Reinforcement over Eastern China
Dense Fog Burst Reinforcement over Eastern China
<p>Fog can be hazardous weather. Dense and polluted fog is especially known to impact transportation, air quality, and public health. Low visibilities on fog days thr...
Atmospheric water collection across diverse climates along the Chilean coast: unraveling synoptic to local drivers of fog harvesting
Atmospheric water collection across diverse climates along the Chilean coast: unraveling synoptic to local drivers of fog harvesting
The 3000 km long coast of Chile, characterized by a steep mountain range, interacts almost everywhere with the Southeast Pacific stratocumulus (Sc) low clouds deck, producing narro...
Fog as a Hydrologic Input
Fog as a Hydrologic Input
AbstractThis article reviews the hydrologic importance of fog in its various forms. Meteorologically, fog is defined as a ground‐touching cloud with a visibility in the horizontal ...
Fog dissipation through ground warming monitored by satellite image : an approach to support regional forecasting 
Fog dissipation through ground warming monitored by satellite image : an approach to support regional forecasting 
<p>By reducing the atmospheric visibility, fog events have strong impacts on several humans activities. Transport security, military operations, air quality forecast ...
Solar Trackers Using Six-Bar Linkages
Solar Trackers Using Six-Bar Linkages
Abstract
A solar panel faces the sun or has the solar ray normal to its face to enhance power reaping. A fixed solar panel can only meet this condition at one moment...
Fog in Sofia 2010–2019: Objective Circulation Classification and Fog Indices
Fog in Sofia 2010–2019: Objective Circulation Classification and Fog Indices
Low visibility caused by fog events can lead to disruption of every type of public transportation, and even loss of life. The focus of this study is the synoptic conditions associa...

