Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Healthcare waste management practices and associated factors among healthcare workers in Sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis

View through CrossRef
Introduction Inadequate management of healthcare waste present significant health hazards to healthcare workers, patients, waste handlers, and the whole communities, especially in developing countries. Although various primary studies have been conducted in different countries across the continent, there has been no comprehensive research examining healthcare waste management practices in Sub-Saharan Africa. Objective This review aimed to assess healthcare waste management practices and associated factors among healthcare workers in Sub-Saharan Africa. Methods and materials This systematic review and meta-analysis were performed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA 20) guidelines. PubMed, Science-Direct, Google Scholar, Hinari, and Google databases were used to find essential literature. The extracted data were analyzed using statistical software, STATA version 14. Publication bias was assessed using the Egger test and funnel plot, whereas heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic. Results This review include 29 studies comprising 7588 participants. The pooled estimate of good healthcare waste management practices among participants was 49.74% (95% CI: 43.73–55.76) (I2 = 96.8%, P < 0.000). Sex, knowledge, training on healthcare waste management, use of working manuals/guidelines, and working hours were factors significantly associated with healthcare waste management practices among healthcare workers., Studies done in South Africa reported the highest good healthcare waste management practices with a value of 54.34% (95% CI: 48.05, 60.63), I2 = 0.00%, P < 0.00. The pooled estimate of good healthcare waste management practices before the occurrences of COVID-19 pandemic was 50.49% (95% CI: 40.7, 60.25), (I2 = 97.9%, P < 0.000). Public health facilities also reported having lower waste management practices with a value of 46.86% (95%CI: 39.33, 54.38%), I2 = 96.8%, P < 0.000. Conclusions This review showed that only half of the healthcare workers practiced good healthcare waste management practices. Sex of the healthcare workers, training status, use of working manuals/guidelines, knowledge towards healthcare waste management, and their daily working hours were factors significantly associated with healthcare waste management practices among healthcare workers. Hence, respective healthcare authorities should develop and implement different healthcare waste management strategies, including ongoing in-service training, provision of healthcare waste management manuals, and conducting regular monitoring to enhance healthcare workers’ knowledge and practices towards healthcare waste management practices.
Title: Healthcare waste management practices and associated factors among healthcare workers in Sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Description:
Introduction Inadequate management of healthcare waste present significant health hazards to healthcare workers, patients, waste handlers, and the whole communities, especially in developing countries.
Although various primary studies have been conducted in different countries across the continent, there has been no comprehensive research examining healthcare waste management practices in Sub-Saharan Africa.
Objective This review aimed to assess healthcare waste management practices and associated factors among healthcare workers in Sub-Saharan Africa.
Methods and materials This systematic review and meta-analysis were performed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA 20) guidelines.
PubMed, Science-Direct, Google Scholar, Hinari, and Google databases were used to find essential literature.
The extracted data were analyzed using statistical software, STATA version 14.
Publication bias was assessed using the Egger test and funnel plot, whereas heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic.
Results This review include 29 studies comprising 7588 participants.
The pooled estimate of good healthcare waste management practices among participants was 49.
74% (95% CI: 43.
73–55.
76) (I2 = 96.
8%, P < 0.
000).
Sex, knowledge, training on healthcare waste management, use of working manuals/guidelines, and working hours were factors significantly associated with healthcare waste management practices among healthcare workers.
, Studies done in South Africa reported the highest good healthcare waste management practices with a value of 54.
34% (95% CI: 48.
05, 60.
63), I2 = 0.
00%, P < 0.
00.
The pooled estimate of good healthcare waste management practices before the occurrences of COVID-19 pandemic was 50.
49% (95% CI: 40.
7, 60.
25), (I2 = 97.
9%, P < 0.
000).
Public health facilities also reported having lower waste management practices with a value of 46.
86% (95%CI: 39.
33, 54.
38%), I2 = 96.
8%, P < 0.
000.
Conclusions This review showed that only half of the healthcare workers practiced good healthcare waste management practices.
Sex of the healthcare workers, training status, use of working manuals/guidelines, knowledge towards healthcare waste management, and their daily working hours were factors significantly associated with healthcare waste management practices among healthcare workers.
Hence, respective healthcare authorities should develop and implement different healthcare waste management strategies, including ongoing in-service training, provision of healthcare waste management manuals, and conducting regular monitoring to enhance healthcare workers’ knowledge and practices towards healthcare waste management practices.

Related Results

Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical activi...
Water Trash Collector
Water Trash Collector
In today day to day life, approximately 71% of the Earth's surface is covered by Without affecting significant role that technology plays in our modern world, environmental and wat...
DENGUE OUTBREAK -IS THE PANIC JUSTIFIED ?
DENGUE OUTBREAK -IS THE PANIC JUSTIFIED ?
In this era of startling developments in the medical field there remains a serious worry about the  hazardous  potential  of  various  by  products  which  if  not  properly  addre...
PENGETAHUAN MAHASISWA TATA BUSANA TENTANG ZERO WASTE PATTERN
PENGETAHUAN MAHASISWA TATA BUSANA TENTANG ZERO WASTE PATTERN
Textile waste is one of the 2nd largest types of waste in the world. The increasing amount of textile waste will have an impact on the environment. There has not been much developm...
EVALUASI SISTEM PENGENDALIAN MANAJEMEN PADA PELAYANAN PERSAMPAHAN PEMERINTAH KABUPATEN TEMANGGUNG
EVALUASI SISTEM PENGENDALIAN MANAJEMEN PADA PELAYANAN PERSAMPAHAN PEMERINTAH KABUPATEN TEMANGGUNG
Garbage is a problem that is still homework for most areas, starting from the household scale, village/kelurahan, district, and even national scale. A management control system in ...
Solid waste characterization of domestic areas of urban Lahore
Solid waste characterization of domestic areas of urban Lahore
Solid waste management in urban areas of Pakistan has become a serious environmental concern. This study aimed at characterizing and quantifying the urban domestic solid waste from...
Do evidence summaries increase health policy‐makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews? A systematic review
Do evidence summaries increase health policy‐makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews? A systematic review
This review summarizes the evidence from six randomized controlled trials that judged the effectiveness of systematic review summaries on policymakers' decision making, or the most...

Back to Top