Comparative Analysis Between John Onimisi Obidi’s Theory of Entropicity (ToE) and Waldemar Marek Feldt’s FELDT–HIGGS Universal Bridge (F–HUB) Theory

In the unfolding landscape of twenty-first century theoretical physics, the pursuit of a unified de-scription of nature remains among the most profound challenges. This paper presents a detailed com-parative analysis between two emerging frameworks—John Onimisi Obidi’s Theory of Entrop-icity (ToE) and Waldemar Marek Feldt’s FELDT–HIGGS Universal Bridge (F–HUB) Theory—each of which offers a novel reinterpretation of mass, gravity, entropy, and information. The Theory of Entropicity (ToE) establishes entropy not as a statistical by-product of disorder but as the fundamental field and causal substrate of physical reality. It reconstructs gravitation, time, and quantum behavior from the dynamics of an entropy field governed by the Obidi Action and the Vuli-Ndlela Integral. Conversely, the FELDT–HIGGS Universal Bridge (F–HUB) formulates an informational architecture of the universe in which mass and spacetime emerge from quantum information structuring mediated by the Higgs field. Its central relation, the F–HUB Master Equation, integrates thermodynamic constants to link information, mass, and entropy within a unified algebraic framework. This study systematically compares the philosophical premises, mathematical foundations, and physical implications of both theories. It further examines whether F–HUB’s informational emergence model can be interpreted as a subset or limiting case of ToE’s entropic dynamics. By contrasting the causality orders—F–HUB: Information → Entropy → Mass → Gravity → Spacetime and ToE: Entropy → Information → Mass → Motion → Spacetime—the paper argues that ToE provides a deeper, first-principles formulation of physical law in which entropy is the generative field underlying information and structure. Both frameworks together signal a paradigm shift toward post-Einsteinian physics grounded not in geometry, but in informational–entropic causation.