Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

<b>Effects of Gong’s Mobilization vs Reverse Distraction Technique in Diabetic Patients with Adhesive Capsulitis</b>

View through CrossRef
Background: Adhesive capsulitis, or frozen shoulder, is a painful and debilitating musculoskeletal condition that disproportionately affects individuals with type II diabetes mellitus. The condition severely restricts shoulder range of motion (ROM), limits daily function, and is often more resistant to conservative treatment in diabetic patients due to capsular fibrosis and metabolic changes. Manual therapy techniques such as Gong’s mobilization and reverse distraction have shown promise, but comparative data in diabetic populations are scarce. Objective: To compare the effectiveness of Gong’s mobilization versus reverse distraction technique on pain, ROM, and functional disability in diabetic patients with adhesive capsulitis after four weeks of intervention. Methods: A single-blind, randomized clinical trial was conducted on 20 diabetic patients with unilateral stage 2–3 adhesive capsulitis. Participants were randomly allocated to either Group A (Gong’s mobilization + conventional physical therapy) or Group B (reverse distraction + conventional therapy). Outcome measures included the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), and goniometric assessment of shoulder ROM. Data were analyzed using paired and independent sample t-tests, with significance set at p<0.05. Results: Both groups showed statistically significant improvements in all outcomes (p<0.05). However, Group A demonstrated significantly greater improvements in SPADI, NPRS, and all ROM parameters (p<0.001). Effect sizes were large for all measures in favor of Gong’s mobilization. Conclusion: While both interventions were effective, Gong’s mobilization was superior to reverse distraction in reducing pain, improving shoulder ROM, and minimizing functional disability in diabetic patients with adhesive capsulitis. Keywords: adhesive capsulitis, diabetes mellitus, Gong’s mobilization, reverse distraction, shoulder mobilization, range of motion, functional disability.
Title: <b>Effects of Gong’s Mobilization vs Reverse Distraction Technique in Diabetic Patients with Adhesive Capsulitis</b>
Description:
Background: Adhesive capsulitis, or frozen shoulder, is a painful and debilitating musculoskeletal condition that disproportionately affects individuals with type II diabetes mellitus.
The condition severely restricts shoulder range of motion (ROM), limits daily function, and is often more resistant to conservative treatment in diabetic patients due to capsular fibrosis and metabolic changes.
Manual therapy techniques such as Gong’s mobilization and reverse distraction have shown promise, but comparative data in diabetic populations are scarce.
Objective: To compare the effectiveness of Gong’s mobilization versus reverse distraction technique on pain, ROM, and functional disability in diabetic patients with adhesive capsulitis after four weeks of intervention.
Methods: A single-blind, randomized clinical trial was conducted on 20 diabetic patients with unilateral stage 2–3 adhesive capsulitis.
Participants were randomly allocated to either Group A (Gong’s mobilization + conventional physical therapy) or Group B (reverse distraction + conventional therapy).
Outcome measures included the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), and goniometric assessment of shoulder ROM.
Data were analyzed using paired and independent sample t-tests, with significance set at p<0.
05.
Results: Both groups showed statistically significant improvements in all outcomes (p<0.
05).
However, Group A demonstrated significantly greater improvements in SPADI, NPRS, and all ROM parameters (p<0.
001).
Effect sizes were large for all measures in favor of Gong’s mobilization.
Conclusion: While both interventions were effective, Gong’s mobilization was superior to reverse distraction in reducing pain, improving shoulder ROM, and minimizing functional disability in diabetic patients with adhesive capsulitis.
Keywords: adhesive capsulitis, diabetes mellitus, Gong’s mobilization, reverse distraction, shoulder mobilization, range of motion, functional disability.

Related Results

Correlation Between Hemoglobin A1c Levels and Incidence of Adhesive Capsulitis
Correlation Between Hemoglobin A1c Levels and Incidence of Adhesive Capsulitis
Abstract Background: Adhesive capsulitis, or arthrofibrosis, describes a pathological process in which the body forms excessive scar tissue or ad...
Protocol for PRP Therapy with Physiotherapy for Shoulder Adhesive Capsulitis v1
Protocol for PRP Therapy with Physiotherapy for Shoulder Adhesive Capsulitis v1
Background and Purpose: Adhesive capsulitis, or frozenshoulder, leads to pain and reduced mobility due to joint inflammation andfibrosis. While physiotherapy is the standard treatm...
Efficacy of Maitland Mobilization Along with Strengthening Exercises Compared with PNF Technique in Treatment of Adhesive Capsulitis
Efficacy of Maitland Mobilization Along with Strengthening Exercises Compared with PNF Technique in Treatment of Adhesive Capsulitis
BACKGROUND: Adhesive capsulitis commonly known as frozen shoulder, is the disease of shoulder in which the shoulder becomes inflamed, stiff, and have restricted ROM. It is more com...
Effect of Maitland Mobilization with and without Spencer Muscle Energy Techniques in Treatment of Frozen Shoulder
Effect of Maitland Mobilization with and without Spencer Muscle Energy Techniques in Treatment of Frozen Shoulder
Background: Frozen Shoulder, or Adhesive Capsulitis, is an inflammatory condition marked by shoulder stiffness, pain, and significant loss of passive range of motion. The condition...

Back to Top