Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Setting the threshold: An analysis of different approaches for the definition of exemptions to water quality objectives in the European Union

View through CrossRef
<p>Continental water ecosystems and human water uses may be jeopardized by degradation of water quality.  To prevent this degradation, the maximum concentration of pollutants for freshwater bodies may need to be set in the legislation. In some cases, the actions needed to achieve those environmental objectives may be technically challenging or financially overburdening. In the case of the European Union (EU), the Water Framework Directive (WFD, Article 4) requires the achievement of the good status of water bodies but allows for the declaration of exemptions due to lack of technical feasibility or disproportionate costs. Twenty years after the WFD approval, the conditions to declare exemptions remain unclear and in practice their declaration  is highly discretional.</p><p>The extant scientific literature suggests several methods to formulate the justification of exemptions. Although the methodologies are diverse, they all require to select a threshold (e.g. in terms of cost disproportionality) above which a relaxation of the environmental objectives may be accepted. This threshold should be uniform across the EU River Basin Districts in order to guarantee a fair distribution of efforts across Member States. To date, however, there are very few studies that compare the application of exemptions in different regions to assess the uniformity of approaches to the declaration of exceptions.</p><p>When defining actions to achieve the good status of water bodies, the quantification of the different pressures, their interactions and the effects on receiving water bodies can be challenging. In the case of physico-chemical pollutants, however, it can be easier to define policy actions as pressures can be quantified (point loads of wastewater treatment plants, diffuse loads emanated by different land uses) and the evolution in receiving waters can be modelled.</p><p>In our research, we analyzed over one thousand water bodies in the River Basin Districts of five different Member States of the European Union (Estonia, a transboundary Ireland-United Kingdom basin, Italy, Spain and Portugal), using the available databases on Digital Elevation Models (Copernicus EU-DEM), land use (CORINE land cover), urban pressures (European Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive dissemination platform and reported data), runoff and gauged flows (Water Information System for Europe, national gauging networks) and WFD exemption databases. Each water body was characterized according to the level of nitrogen and phosphorus pressures deriving from point and diffuse loads, and the declaration of exemptions to the environmental objectives for those nutrients. The exemption threshold is assessed for each River Basin District, allowing for a critical review of the different water policies in this significant aspect of the Water Framework Directive implementation.</p>
Title: Setting the threshold: An analysis of different approaches for the definition of exemptions to water quality objectives in the European Union
Description:
<p>Continental water ecosystems and human water uses may be jeopardized by degradation of water quality.
 To prevent this degradation, the maximum concentration of pollutants for freshwater bodies may need to be set in the legislation.
In some cases, the actions needed to achieve those environmental objectives may be technically challenging or financially overburdening.
In the case of the European Union (EU), the Water Framework Directive (WFD, Article 4) requires the achievement of the good status of water bodies but allows for the declaration of exemptions due to lack of technical feasibility or disproportionate costs.
Twenty years after the WFD approval, the conditions to declare exemptions remain unclear and in practice their declaration  is highly discretional.
</p><p>The extant scientific literature suggests several methods to formulate the justification of exemptions.
Although the methodologies are diverse, they all require to select a threshold (e.
g.
in terms of cost disproportionality) above which a relaxation of the environmental objectives may be accepted.
This threshold should be uniform across the EU River Basin Districts in order to guarantee a fair distribution of efforts across Member States.
To date, however, there are very few studies that compare the application of exemptions in different regions to assess the uniformity of approaches to the declaration of exceptions.
</p><p>When defining actions to achieve the good status of water bodies, the quantification of the different pressures, their interactions and the effects on receiving water bodies can be challenging.
In the case of physico-chemical pollutants, however, it can be easier to define policy actions as pressures can be quantified (point loads of wastewater treatment plants, diffuse loads emanated by different land uses) and the evolution in receiving waters can be modelled.
</p><p>In our research, we analyzed over one thousand water bodies in the River Basin Districts of five different Member States of the European Union (Estonia, a transboundary Ireland-United Kingdom basin, Italy, Spain and Portugal), using the available databases on Digital Elevation Models (Copernicus EU-DEM), land use (CORINE land cover), urban pressures (European Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive dissemination platform and reported data), runoff and gauged flows (Water Information System for Europe, national gauging networks) and WFD exemption databases.
Each water body was characterized according to the level of nitrogen and phosphorus pressures deriving from point and diffuse loads, and the declaration of exemptions to the environmental objectives for those nutrients.
The exemption threshold is assessed for each River Basin District, allowing for a critical review of the different water policies in this significant aspect of the Water Framework Directive implementation.
</p>.

Related Results

European Union Rohs Recast – Implication for Exemption and Substance Review
European Union Rohs Recast – Implication for Exemption and Substance Review
ABSTRACT The European Union’s (EU) Restriction of Hazardous Substances Directive 2002/95/EC (RoHS) [1] took effect on July 1, 2006 and restricted the use of six h...
Religious Exemptions
Religious Exemptions
Exemptions from legal requirements, especially religious exemptions, have been a major topic of political debate in recent years. Bakers in various states have sought the right to ...
European Union Rohs Leaded Solder Exemption Update
European Union Rohs Leaded Solder Exemption Update
ABSTRACT The European Union’s (EU) Restriction of Hazardous Substances Directive 2002/95/EC (RoHS or Directive) [1] took effect on July 1, 2006 restricting the us...
Integrated hydrological modelling for sustainable water allocation planning : Mkomazi Basin, South Africa case study
Integrated hydrological modelling for sustainable water allocation planning : Mkomazi Basin, South Africa case study
Allocation of freshwater resources between societal needs and natural ecological systems is of great concern for water managers. This development has challenged decision-makers reg...
Cash‐based approaches in humanitarian emergencies: a systematic review
Cash‐based approaches in humanitarian emergencies: a systematic review
This Campbell systematic review examines the effectiveness, efficiency and implementation of cash transfers in humanitarian settings. The review summarises evidence from five studi...
Environmental Surveillance Protocols for Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI) v2
Environmental Surveillance Protocols for Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI) v2
EnvironmentalSurveillance Protocols for Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI) This comprehensive protocol suite enables systematic environmental surveillance for avian influenza...
Judicial Restraint Law Politics of the Constitutional Court Against Parliamentary Threshold: A Comparison of Indonesia and Philippines
Judicial Restraint Law Politics of the Constitutional Court Against Parliamentary Threshold: A Comparison of Indonesia and Philippines
ABSTRACT The Purpose of this Research is to examine 1) Legal construction of the Judicial Review of Parliamentary Threshold No. 44/PUUXV/2017 and No. 62/PUU-XXII/2024 on Judicial R...

Back to Top