Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Progressive validation of psychiatric syndromes: The example of panic disorder
View through CrossRef
Prior validation approaches for psychiatric disorders, as used in DSM-IV and DSM-5, have been synchronic—snapshots of results typically taken out of temporal context. This chapter explores the advantages of a diachronic approach to validation. The discovery of juvenile-onset and adult-onset diabetes is explored as an example of a successful division of a broad biomedical syndrome into subtypes. This division has yielded fruitful insights into etiology and treatment. A psychiatric example, reviewed in detail, is the division of anxiety neurosis into panic disorder and generalized anxiety disorder. A range of etiologic and treatment studies have supported the distinction between these two forms of anxiety. These findings are interpreted in the context of Lakatos’s conceptual framework of a progressive versus degenerative scientific paradigm. The conclusion is that considering a diachronic or historical view of validity of psychiatric disorders adds a valuable perspective to the discipline and its nosology.
Title: Progressive validation of psychiatric syndromes: The example of panic disorder
Description:
Prior validation approaches for psychiatric disorders, as used in DSM-IV and DSM-5, have been synchronic—snapshots of results typically taken out of temporal context.
This chapter explores the advantages of a diachronic approach to validation.
The discovery of juvenile-onset and adult-onset diabetes is explored as an example of a successful division of a broad biomedical syndrome into subtypes.
This division has yielded fruitful insights into etiology and treatment.
A psychiatric example, reviewed in detail, is the division of anxiety neurosis into panic disorder and generalized anxiety disorder.
A range of etiologic and treatment studies have supported the distinction between these two forms of anxiety.
These findings are interpreted in the context of Lakatos’s conceptual framework of a progressive versus degenerative scientific paradigm.
The conclusion is that considering a diachronic or historical view of validity of psychiatric disorders adds a valuable perspective to the discipline and its nosology.
Related Results
Psychiatry
Psychiatry
An understanding of psychiatric illness is critical to the practice of internal medicine. Since 30% to 40% of ambulatory primary care visits have a psychiatric ...
Onset, Course, and Prognosis for Borderline Personality Disorder
Onset, Course, and Prognosis for Borderline Personality Disorder
Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is a common psychiatric disorder; the best epidemiological evidence estimating that about 2% of American adults meet DSM-IV criteria for BPD a...
Free from Panic
Free from Panic
Co-authored by clinicians specialising in anxiety, this guide for teens struggling with panic symptoms or panic disorder uses strategies from CBT, ACT and CFT. It is particularly u...
Biological Psychiatry of Cancer and Cancer Treatment
Biological Psychiatry of Cancer and Cancer Treatment
As long-term cancer survival becomes a widely shared experience, the quality of life of people living with and beyond a cancer diagnosis is increasingly important. Optimizing the p...
The psychiatric interview with adults
The psychiatric interview with adults
The chapter describes how to take a comprehensive psychiatric history with adults. It explains that the purpose of the psychiatric history is to elicit the necessary information to...
Vagueness in Psychiatry
Vagueness in Psychiatry
Blurred boundaries between the normal and the pathological are a recurrent theme in almost every publication concerned with the classification of mental disorders. However, systema...
Atlas of X-Linked Intellectual Disability Syndromes
Atlas of X-Linked Intellectual Disability Syndromes
Abstract
Atlas of X-Linked Intellectual Disability Syndromes, 3rd Edition is a comprehensive reference for clinicians, laboratory geneticists, and researchers wor...

