Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Environmental, social and governance (ESG) - augmented investments in innovation and firms' value: a fixed-effects panel regression of Asian economies
View through CrossRef
PurposeHistorically, investments in innovation are perceived as one of the paramount decisions businesses opt to thrive and the impact of such investments on businesses' market performance is well documented in the literature. However, the environmental aspects of making such investments are yet to be addressed by the firms, which in turn, present considerable damage to the environment. Coupling with the natural resource-based view (NRBV) and the stakeholder theory of the firm, this research builds on an earlier work of Khalil and Nimmanunta (2021) in an attempt to examine the link between innovation and firms' environmental and financial value. The authors extend their analysis and document a more consistent approach to measuring environmental innovation which allows the authors to investigate the firms from three additional economies with respect to firms' investments in both traditional and environmental innovations.Design/methodology/approachThe underlying models are tested using the time fixed-effects panel regression by utilizing information from publicly traded companies of ten Asian economies, including Japan, Hong Kong, Taiwan, Thailand, Turkey, Malaysia, Singapore, India, Indonesia, and Saudi Arabia. The reported sample covers annual firm-level ESG data obtained from Thomson Reuters' Datastream and Refinitiv Eikon during the 2015–2019 period.FindingsThis research offers support to the conventional wisdom that innovation is advantageous to the firms' market value. The authors further decompose innovation into traditional innovation and environmental innovation. The findings of this research suggest that traditional innovation is favorable only for the firms' market valuation and traditional innovation is strongly ineffectual for the environment – traditional innovation produces sizeable environmental distress by contributing substantially to carbon emissions. In contrast, the resultant effects of investments in environmental innovation are evident to be instrumental for both firms' financial performance and the environment.Research limitations/implicationsThis research has primarily focused on only two components of a company's environmental performance: reduction in carbon emissions (CO2) and corporate social responsibility (CSR). Given the complexity of firms' environmental strategies and the multidimensionality of the variable, which encompasses a wide range of corporate behavior in terms of relationships with communities, suppliers, consumers, and broader environmental responsibilities broadening the scope of the study by including other important aspects of environmental sustainability is, therefore, critical.Practical implicationsThe findings of this research signify environmental innovation as one of the vital investment approaches as firms can exploit benefits related to the market from firms' sustainable practices, developing eco-friendly processes by introducing steady yet systematic chains of green products and services. Such products and services may have a feature of enhanced functionality with a better layout in terms of improved product life with better recycling options, and lower consumption and exploitation of energy and natural resources. These sustainable practices would be advantageous for the firms regarding the possibility of setting prices above the standard level through establishing green brands and gaining market share of environmentally anxious consumers. For those companies that are striving to take the leading role in the green industry and longing to seek superior returns on the companies' environmental investments, these benefits, in particular, are exceptionally critical to them.Originality/valueThe linkage between firms' financial and environmental performance in the context of simultaneous inclusion of both green and traditional innovations remains unclear and is yet to be investigated by researchers. Thus, this research shed light on the role of environmental innovation and traditional innovation on firms' environmental performance and financial performance. The authors utilize a novel dataset with a clear indication of measuring different elements of innovation that allows us to develop a more robust approach to corporates' environmental, social and governance (ESG) performance metrics having the slightest biases related to transparency and firm size.
Title: Environmental, social and governance (ESG) - augmented investments in innovation and firms' value: a fixed-effects panel regression of Asian economies
Description:
PurposeHistorically, investments in innovation are perceived as one of the paramount decisions businesses opt to thrive and the impact of such investments on businesses' market performance is well documented in the literature.
However, the environmental aspects of making such investments are yet to be addressed by the firms, which in turn, present considerable damage to the environment.
Coupling with the natural resource-based view (NRBV) and the stakeholder theory of the firm, this research builds on an earlier work of Khalil and Nimmanunta (2021) in an attempt to examine the link between innovation and firms' environmental and financial value.
The authors extend their analysis and document a more consistent approach to measuring environmental innovation which allows the authors to investigate the firms from three additional economies with respect to firms' investments in both traditional and environmental innovations.
Design/methodology/approachThe underlying models are tested using the time fixed-effects panel regression by utilizing information from publicly traded companies of ten Asian economies, including Japan, Hong Kong, Taiwan, Thailand, Turkey, Malaysia, Singapore, India, Indonesia, and Saudi Arabia.
The reported sample covers annual firm-level ESG data obtained from Thomson Reuters' Datastream and Refinitiv Eikon during the 2015–2019 period.
FindingsThis research offers support to the conventional wisdom that innovation is advantageous to the firms' market value.
The authors further decompose innovation into traditional innovation and environmental innovation.
The findings of this research suggest that traditional innovation is favorable only for the firms' market valuation and traditional innovation is strongly ineffectual for the environment – traditional innovation produces sizeable environmental distress by contributing substantially to carbon emissions.
In contrast, the resultant effects of investments in environmental innovation are evident to be instrumental for both firms' financial performance and the environment.
Research limitations/implicationsThis research has primarily focused on only two components of a company's environmental performance: reduction in carbon emissions (CO2) and corporate social responsibility (CSR).
Given the complexity of firms' environmental strategies and the multidimensionality of the variable, which encompasses a wide range of corporate behavior in terms of relationships with communities, suppliers, consumers, and broader environmental responsibilities broadening the scope of the study by including other important aspects of environmental sustainability is, therefore, critical.
Practical implicationsThe findings of this research signify environmental innovation as one of the vital investment approaches as firms can exploit benefits related to the market from firms' sustainable practices, developing eco-friendly processes by introducing steady yet systematic chains of green products and services.
Such products and services may have a feature of enhanced functionality with a better layout in terms of improved product life with better recycling options, and lower consumption and exploitation of energy and natural resources.
These sustainable practices would be advantageous for the firms regarding the possibility of setting prices above the standard level through establishing green brands and gaining market share of environmentally anxious consumers.
For those companies that are striving to take the leading role in the green industry and longing to seek superior returns on the companies' environmental investments, these benefits, in particular, are exceptionally critical to them.
Originality/valueThe linkage between firms' financial and environmental performance in the context of simultaneous inclusion of both green and traditional innovations remains unclear and is yet to be investigated by researchers.
Thus, this research shed light on the role of environmental innovation and traditional innovation on firms' environmental performance and financial performance.
The authors utilize a novel dataset with a clear indication of measuring different elements of innovation that allows us to develop a more robust approach to corporates' environmental, social and governance (ESG) performance metrics having the slightest biases related to transparency and firm size.
Related Results
Innovation in family firms: The Brittelstand
Innovation in family firms: The Brittelstand
PurposeThe Brittelstand are innovative, family-owned firms that offer national and international opportunities in the United Kingdom (UK). These fast-growing businesses are custome...
Corporate Governance Characteristics and Environmental, Social & Governance (ESG) Performance: Evidence from the Banking Sector of Pakistan
Corporate Governance Characteristics and Environmental, Social & Governance (ESG) Performance: Evidence from the Banking Sector of Pakistan
The purpose of the paper is to examine the impact of corporate governance on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance.This paper alsoinvestigates the influence of co...
UNCOVERING DIVERSIFICATION BENEFITS: RETURN SPILLOVERS IN USA ESG AND NON-ESG ORIENTED BANKS
UNCOVERING DIVERSIFICATION BENEFITS: RETURN SPILLOVERS IN USA ESG AND NON-ESG ORIENTED BANKS
The balance sheet is a source of interconnectedness among financial products and affect the overall system of economics. Due to interest of investors in the market’s connectedness,...
ESG INTEGRATION IN FINANCIAL SECTORS: A CASE OF SUSTAINABILITY INVESTMENT STRATEGIES
ESG INTEGRATION IN FINANCIAL SECTORS: A CASE OF SUSTAINABILITY INVESTMENT STRATEGIES
Purpose: The integration of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) factors in the financial sector, aiming to comprehend the present tactics, evaluating the efficiency of sust...
Sustainable Investing - Does ESG Induce a Virtuous Circle?
Sustainable Investing - Does ESG Induce a Virtuous Circle?
A környezeti, társadalmi és gazdasági rendszerek fenntarthatóságának szavatolása jelentős kihívás elé állítja korunk társadalmát. A klímaváltozás mérséklésére 2016-ban megkötött pá...
ESG Carbonwashing: A New Type of ESG-Washing
ESG Carbonwashing: A New Type of ESG-Washing
In 2020, the Chinese government announced the “Dual Carbon” goals, making carbon responsibility the most prominent focus within the Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) prac...
Esg Portfolio vs Traditional Portfolio Analysis-a Study Of MSCI ESG Indices
Esg Portfolio vs Traditional Portfolio Analysis-a Study Of MSCI ESG Indices
Corporate’s ability to create long-term value for stakeholders doesn’t only depend on financial information, but also on integrating non-financial information in the form of En...
Structural Equilibrium of Corporate ESG and Linkage with Economic System: A Case Study of SK Hynix
Structural Equilibrium of Corporate ESG and Linkage with Economic System: A Case Study of SK Hynix
ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) has gradually evolved from a concept to a global consensus, and ESG research has also moved from policy exploration and macroeconomics t...


