Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Measured Swabbing Pressures and Implications for Shallow Gas Blow-Out

View through CrossRef
Abstract Swabbing pressures can affect borehole stability. Temporary and local pressure reductions in the borehole fluid can disrupt the in-situ gas-fluid-soil equilibrium and may trigger a shallow gas blow-out. This paper presents swabbing pressures measured during riser-less drilling and testing activities. Results show pressure reductions of up to about 1.2 MPa below hydrostatic values. Borehole depths were up to about 400 m below seafloor. Some measurements were made in boreholes in which gas blow-outs occurred shortly after acquisition of the data. The magnitude of the measured swabbing pressures cannot be correlated with water depth and depth below seafloor and soil type. The riser-less drilling and testing practice appears to dominate the magnitude of the measured swabbing pressures. A procedure for shallow gas hazard assessment is proposed. This procedure serves as input for risk management for riser-less drilling and associated logging, sampling and testing. Introduction Shallow gas in marine soils is a hazard for open-hole or riser-less borehole drilling, depending on quantity and pressure of the shallow gas. Riser-less drilling is common for (1) oil and gas drilling, (2) logging, sampling and testing for geohazards (Peuchen and Raap, 2007), and (3) sampling and testing for geotechnical data acquisition (Kolk and Wegerif, 2005). Subsurface gas may be present in three different forms (Sills and Wheeler, 1992):In solution in the pore water. This gas will have little effect on drilling and testing unless the ambient pressure is reduced by, for example, drilling or in-pipe tool handling. Then the gas may come out of solution and become free gas.Undissolved gas bubbles. Bubbles may be present in soil pores (Judd and Høvland, 2007). The bubbles may accumulate in high pressure pockets or layers, trapped beneath an impermeable capping layer. Sufficient quantities of undissolved gas may present a blow-out hazard.As gas hydrates. These may be hazardous because they melt and release free gas when exposed to ambient pressure relief. However, few incidents due to drilling in gas hydrates have been reported to date (Judd and Høvland, 2007). Many blow-outs during riser-less drilling happen when pulling drill pipe or a tool. Pulling drill pipe or a tool often generates an under-pressure, or swabbing pressure, which may lead to a blow-out. Local pressure reductions in the borehole fluid can initiate flow of free gas or allow dissolved shallow gas to become free gas. The presence of the gas will further decrease the drilling fluid pressure, which in turn will increase the potential for gas to enter the borehole, further decreasing the ambient pressure in a self-perpetuating cycle. Surge and swab calculations are common for oil and gas drilling. These are used to protect the borehole from overpressure and fracture whilst running pipe or casing, and to negate the effects of swabbing during tripping operations. There are a few papers that present measurements of swabbing and surge pressures during oil and gas drilling. These measurements were used to validate swab-surge response models. Swabbing pressures of 500 kPa to 900 kPa have been measured while pulling pipe from 1130 m to 1070 m depth (Samuel et al., 2001; 2003). A pressure of 900 kPa was measured during reciprocation without circulation at 1300 m to 1270 m depth (Samuel et al., 2001; 2003). Swabbing pressures collected while pulling the pipes from an offshore well after cementing the liner were 650 kPa to 830 kPa. The pipes were pulled out of the hole with an average velocity of 0.5 m/s (Wagner et al., 1993). The authors know of no records of swabbing pressures measured during geohazard and geotechnical drilling and testing. The following sections focus on swabbing pressures and their potential for triggering a shallow gas blow-out. The measurements and supplementary observations have contributed to improving safe offshore practices.
Title: Measured Swabbing Pressures and Implications for Shallow Gas Blow-Out
Description:
Abstract Swabbing pressures can affect borehole stability.
Temporary and local pressure reductions in the borehole fluid can disrupt the in-situ gas-fluid-soil equilibrium and may trigger a shallow gas blow-out.
This paper presents swabbing pressures measured during riser-less drilling and testing activities.
Results show pressure reductions of up to about 1.
2 MPa below hydrostatic values.
Borehole depths were up to about 400 m below seafloor.
Some measurements were made in boreholes in which gas blow-outs occurred shortly after acquisition of the data.
The magnitude of the measured swabbing pressures cannot be correlated with water depth and depth below seafloor and soil type.
The riser-less drilling and testing practice appears to dominate the magnitude of the measured swabbing pressures.
A procedure for shallow gas hazard assessment is proposed.
This procedure serves as input for risk management for riser-less drilling and associated logging, sampling and testing.
Introduction Shallow gas in marine soils is a hazard for open-hole or riser-less borehole drilling, depending on quantity and pressure of the shallow gas.
Riser-less drilling is common for (1) oil and gas drilling, (2) logging, sampling and testing for geohazards (Peuchen and Raap, 2007), and (3) sampling and testing for geotechnical data acquisition (Kolk and Wegerif, 2005).
Subsurface gas may be present in three different forms (Sills and Wheeler, 1992):In solution in the pore water.
This gas will have little effect on drilling and testing unless the ambient pressure is reduced by, for example, drilling or in-pipe tool handling.
Then the gas may come out of solution and become free gas.
Undissolved gas bubbles.
Bubbles may be present in soil pores (Judd and Høvland, 2007).
The bubbles may accumulate in high pressure pockets or layers, trapped beneath an impermeable capping layer.
Sufficient quantities of undissolved gas may present a blow-out hazard.
As gas hydrates.
These may be hazardous because they melt and release free gas when exposed to ambient pressure relief.
However, few incidents due to drilling in gas hydrates have been reported to date (Judd and Høvland, 2007).
Many blow-outs during riser-less drilling happen when pulling drill pipe or a tool.
Pulling drill pipe or a tool often generates an under-pressure, or swabbing pressure, which may lead to a blow-out.
Local pressure reductions in the borehole fluid can initiate flow of free gas or allow dissolved shallow gas to become free gas.
The presence of the gas will further decrease the drilling fluid pressure, which in turn will increase the potential for gas to enter the borehole, further decreasing the ambient pressure in a self-perpetuating cycle.
Surge and swab calculations are common for oil and gas drilling.
These are used to protect the borehole from overpressure and fracture whilst running pipe or casing, and to negate the effects of swabbing during tripping operations.
There are a few papers that present measurements of swabbing and surge pressures during oil and gas drilling.
These measurements were used to validate swab-surge response models.
Swabbing pressures of 500 kPa to 900 kPa have been measured while pulling pipe from 1130 m to 1070 m depth (Samuel et al.
, 2001; 2003).
A pressure of 900 kPa was measured during reciprocation without circulation at 1300 m to 1270 m depth (Samuel et al.
, 2001; 2003).
Swabbing pressures collected while pulling the pipes from an offshore well after cementing the liner were 650 kPa to 830 kPa.
The pipes were pulled out of the hole with an average velocity of 0.
5 m/s (Wagner et al.
, 1993).
The authors know of no records of swabbing pressures measured during geohazard and geotechnical drilling and testing.
The following sections focus on swabbing pressures and their potential for triggering a shallow gas blow-out.
The measurements and supplementary observations have contributed to improving safe offshore practices.

Related Results

Shallow Gas In The Oseberg, Brage And Troll Fields North Sea, 60°30' N
Shallow Gas In The Oseberg, Brage And Troll Fields North Sea, 60°30' N
Abstract An integrated approach using geological, seismic, geotechnical and well log data have been used to investigate the presence of shallow gas in the Oseberg...
Practice of Ultra-Deepwater Shallow Well Construction in Nature Gas Hydrate and Shallow Gas Formation
Practice of Ultra-Deepwater Shallow Well Construction in Nature Gas Hydrate and Shallow Gas Formation
Abstract Due to the large water depth and geological structure, a large amount of nature gas hydrate (NGH) and shallow gas are buried in the shallow layer in the dee...
Drilling and Cementing Through Highly Active Shallow Gas Field
Drilling and Cementing Through Highly Active Shallow Gas Field
Abstract Drilling and cementing through surface sections with highly active shallow gas formations is seriously challenging. In order to save employees lives and mai...
Manager Of Supply Planning And Projects
Manager Of Supply Planning And Projects
Abstract The Southern California Gas Company is responsible for providing gas service to 12 million southern Californians. SoCal Gas, like other major gas distrib...
Gas Utilization – The KOC Approach
Gas Utilization – The KOC Approach
Abstract Kuwait Oil Company (KOC), an upstream subsidiary of Kuwait Petroleum Corporation (KPC), ranks amongst the major oil companies of the world. However, due to ...
Comparisons of Pore Structure for Unconventional Tight Gas, Coalbed Methane and Shale Gas Reservoirs
Comparisons of Pore Structure for Unconventional Tight Gas, Coalbed Methane and Shale Gas Reservoirs
Extended abstract Tight sands gas, coalbed methane and shale gas are three kinds of typical unconventional natural gas. With the decrease of conventional oil and gas...
Improved Gas-In-Place Determination for Coal Gas Reservoirs
Improved Gas-In-Place Determination for Coal Gas Reservoirs
Abstract The Upper Cretaceous Fruitland Formation of the San Juan Basin of Colorado and New Mexico has been a very active natural gas play in recent years. Case...
Unconventional Reservoirs: Basic Petrophysical Concepts for Shale Gas
Unconventional Reservoirs: Basic Petrophysical Concepts for Shale Gas
Abstract Unconventional reservoirs have burst with considerable force in oil and gas production worldwide. Shale Gas is one of them, with intense activity taking pla...

Back to Top