Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Introduction What Difference Does the Difference Make? Cultural Pluralism as Friendship

View through CrossRef
This introductory chapter discusses the development of cultural pluralism through the friendship between Horace Kallen and Alain Locke. Kallen and Locke each rejected a crucial aspect of their identities: in Kallen's case, religion; in Locke's, biology. They met on the plane of high culture. They envisioned cultural pluralism as an elite project. They embraced the civilization they lived in and loved, particularly in the United States' and England's most prestigious institutions. These intellectual worlds provided space for transcending racial and religious barriers while upholding ethnic particularism. Both men came to embrace what they regarded as the strengths of their respective groups, rather than the weaknesses. Each man came to appreciate the value of the other's community, though Kallen more slowly than Locke. They would praise contributions Black people and Jews made to American and global civilization. Years later, when recalling his conversations with Locke, Kallen defined cultural pluralism as “the right to be different.” Kallen and Locke shared a fundamental belief in that right. Yet their adherence to cultural pluralism went beyond the language of rights. Group difference should not merely be tolerated; it should be celebrated.
Cornell University Press
Title: Introduction What Difference Does the Difference Make? Cultural Pluralism as Friendship
Description:
This introductory chapter discusses the development of cultural pluralism through the friendship between Horace Kallen and Alain Locke.
Kallen and Locke each rejected a crucial aspect of their identities: in Kallen's case, religion; in Locke's, biology.
They met on the plane of high culture.
They envisioned cultural pluralism as an elite project.
They embraced the civilization they lived in and loved, particularly in the United States' and England's most prestigious institutions.
These intellectual worlds provided space for transcending racial and religious barriers while upholding ethnic particularism.
Both men came to embrace what they regarded as the strengths of their respective groups, rather than the weaknesses.
Each man came to appreciate the value of the other's community, though Kallen more slowly than Locke.
They would praise contributions Black people and Jews made to American and global civilization.
Years later, when recalling his conversations with Locke, Kallen defined cultural pluralism as “the right to be different.
” Kallen and Locke shared a fundamental belief in that right.
Yet their adherence to cultural pluralism went beyond the language of rights.
Group difference should not merely be tolerated; it should be celebrated.

Related Results

Cultural Pluralism and Communication
Cultural Pluralism and Communication
Cultural pluralism refers to conceptions of cultural heterogeneity, the term pluralism being understood in contrast to substance individualism. In general, pluralism denotes anti-m...
Legal Pluralism
Legal Pluralism
Legal pluralism is a construct, a means of understanding and imagining the world, both positively (as it is) and normatively (as it ought to be). Originating from critiques of lega...
Intercultural Friendships
Intercultural Friendships
Intercultural friendship is known to reduce prejudice and foster international goodwill. Yet, intercultural friendship is not commonplace due to a complex interplay of factors that...
Religious Pluralism
Religious Pluralism
Within the philosophy of religion, theories of religious pluralism are models that provide a philosophical account of religious diversity. They are not descriptive theories of reli...
Value Pluralism and Legal Pluralism
Value Pluralism and Legal Pluralism
Abstract In this chapter, the focus is on the question how different ideas of pluralism, legal pluralism, and value pluralism, relate. The background to the question...
Liberal Pluralism
Liberal Pluralism
Recalling J. S. Mill’s consciousness of the different goals of human life, the modern debate about pluralism has gathered momentum in liberal philosophy largely as a consequence of...
The Role of Personality Traits and Values in Perceived Friendship Quality: The Dyadic Approach
The Role of Personality Traits and Values in Perceived Friendship Quality: The Dyadic Approach
This study using dyadic approach, focused on the impact of personality traits and basic human values on the synchrony and the average level of perceived friendship quality between ...
Measurable Progress? Teaching Artsworkers to Assess and Articulate the Impact of Their Work
Measurable Progress? Teaching Artsworkers to Assess and Articulate the Impact of Their Work
The National Cultural Policy Discussion Paper—drafted to assist the Australian Government in developing the first national Cultural Policy since Creative Nation nearly two decades ...

Back to Top