Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Adaptive designed eniluracil + capecitabine phase 2 trial in advanced or metastatic breast cancer patients.
View through CrossRef
TPS1133
Background:
Ethynyl-uracil (eniluracil or 6422), an irreversible inhibitor of the dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase enzyme that metabolizes 5-FU to catabolites, eliminates the formation of 5-FU catabolites and catabolite side effects while exposing cancer cells to more 5-FU and more cancer killing 5-FU anabolites. The combination of a single 40 mg day 1 dose of 6422 followed by Day 2 Capecitabine (6422+Cap) on a 7 day on + 7 day off schedule (7+7) of Capecitabine (Cap) is being evaluated. The dose of Cap used in 6422+Cap will be approximately 15% of the therapeutic dose of Cap used in clinical practice for breast cancer. A Phase 1B study in patients with refractory gastrointestinal (GI) cancer has been completed. The Maximum Tolerated Dose of Cap in 6422+Cap was determined to be 225 mg BID. The Recommended Phase 2 Dose Range of Cap in 6422+Cap was determined to be from 75 mg BID to 225 mg BID. based on the FDA’s Optimal Design Guidance and Project Optimus initiative to define the dose-response relationship for both safety and efficacy. Since FDA believed that determining the optimal dosage regimen following the Principles of Project Optimus would be extremely difficult for 6422+Cap in GI cancer given the standard combination chemotherapeutic treatments, the target population was changed to breast cancer patients. FDA also determined that a Phase 1B study in breast cancer would not be required given the GI cancer Phase 1B data.
Methods:
Several Project Optimus focused Phase 2 designs were evaluated. Based on guidance from the FDA, an adaptive, 3 arm, 30 patients/arm, phase 2, open-labelled, randomized trial was selected which would compare 2 regimens of 6422+Cap vs. standard dose of Cap alone. The study would initially enroll patients into 2 treatment arms. The 2 arms are: a 1000 mg/m2 BID monotherapy Cap control group and a 6422+Cap regimen of 40 mg on day 1 followed by day 2 Cap dose of 150 mg BID on 7+7 schedule. Upon completing the enrollment and evaluation of 9-10 patients in each of the first 2 arms, an interim analysis will be conducted to determine the Cap dose to be used in the 6422+Cap 3
rd
arm. Depending on the interim results, Cap dose in the 3
rd
arm will either be increased to 225 mg BID or decreased to 75 mg BID. Patients with triple-negative or HR positive/HER2 negative, advanced or metastatic breast cancer are eligible for the study. Patients should have measurable disease in accordance with RECIST 1.1. Patients with stable brain metastases are eligible. The primary endpoint of the study is Objective Response Rate. This will be assessed based on the null hypothesis that the endpoint in each 6422+Cap arm is less than or equal to the monotherapy arm. Additionally, safety will be assessed by the incidence and severity of adverse events across treatment groups. The pharmacokinetics of Cap, 5-FU, and the FBAL catabolite will be evaluated using population PK analysis. Currently 3 patients have been enrolled in the study.
Clinical trial information:
NCT06568692
.
American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
Title: Adaptive designed eniluracil + capecitabine phase 2 trial in advanced or metastatic breast cancer patients.
Description:
TPS1133
Background:
Ethynyl-uracil (eniluracil or 6422), an irreversible inhibitor of the dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase enzyme that metabolizes 5-FU to catabolites, eliminates the formation of 5-FU catabolites and catabolite side effects while exposing cancer cells to more 5-FU and more cancer killing 5-FU anabolites.
The combination of a single 40 mg day 1 dose of 6422 followed by Day 2 Capecitabine (6422+Cap) on a 7 day on + 7 day off schedule (7+7) of Capecitabine (Cap) is being evaluated.
The dose of Cap used in 6422+Cap will be approximately 15% of the therapeutic dose of Cap used in clinical practice for breast cancer.
A Phase 1B study in patients with refractory gastrointestinal (GI) cancer has been completed.
The Maximum Tolerated Dose of Cap in 6422+Cap was determined to be 225 mg BID.
The Recommended Phase 2 Dose Range of Cap in 6422+Cap was determined to be from 75 mg BID to 225 mg BID.
based on the FDA’s Optimal Design Guidance and Project Optimus initiative to define the dose-response relationship for both safety and efficacy.
Since FDA believed that determining the optimal dosage regimen following the Principles of Project Optimus would be extremely difficult for 6422+Cap in GI cancer given the standard combination chemotherapeutic treatments, the target population was changed to breast cancer patients.
FDA also determined that a Phase 1B study in breast cancer would not be required given the GI cancer Phase 1B data.
Methods:
Several Project Optimus focused Phase 2 designs were evaluated.
Based on guidance from the FDA, an adaptive, 3 arm, 30 patients/arm, phase 2, open-labelled, randomized trial was selected which would compare 2 regimens of 6422+Cap vs.
standard dose of Cap alone.
The study would initially enroll patients into 2 treatment arms.
The 2 arms are: a 1000 mg/m2 BID monotherapy Cap control group and a 6422+Cap regimen of 40 mg on day 1 followed by day 2 Cap dose of 150 mg BID on 7+7 schedule.
Upon completing the enrollment and evaluation of 9-10 patients in each of the first 2 arms, an interim analysis will be conducted to determine the Cap dose to be used in the 6422+Cap 3
rd
arm.
Depending on the interim results, Cap dose in the 3
rd
arm will either be increased to 225 mg BID or decreased to 75 mg BID.
Patients with triple-negative or HR positive/HER2 negative, advanced or metastatic breast cancer are eligible for the study.
Patients should have measurable disease in accordance with RECIST 1.
1.
Patients with stable brain metastases are eligible.
The primary endpoint of the study is Objective Response Rate.
This will be assessed based on the null hypothesis that the endpoint in each 6422+Cap arm is less than or equal to the monotherapy arm.
Additionally, safety will be assessed by the incidence and severity of adverse events across treatment groups.
The pharmacokinetics of Cap, 5-FU, and the FBAL catabolite will be evaluated using population PK analysis.
Currently 3 patients have been enrolled in the study.
Clinical trial information:
NCT06568692
.
Related Results
Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM)
Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM)
This section provides current contact details and a summary of recent or ongoing clinical trials being coordinated by Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM). Clinical trials...
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction
Fibroadenoma is the most common benign breast lesion; however, it carries a potential risk of malignant transformation. This systematic review provides an ove...
International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG)
International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG)
This section provides current contact details and a summary of recent or ongoing clinical trials being coordinated by International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG). Clinical tria...
Desmoid-Type Fibromatosis of The Breast: A Case Series
Desmoid-Type Fibromatosis of The Breast: A Case Series
Abstract
IntroductionDesmoid-type fibromatosis (DTF), also called aggressive fibromatosis, is a rare, benign, locally aggressive condition. Mammary DTF originates from fibroblasts ...
Breast cancer biomarkers : dynamics during treatment and metastatic progression
Breast cancer biomarkers : dynamics during treatment and metastatic progression
<p dir="ltr">Breast cancer is a major global health challenge as incidence is increasing, and risk of recurrence remains a significant concern for long-term survivors. In an ...
Breast cancer biomarkers : dynamics during treatment and metastatic progression
Breast cancer biomarkers : dynamics during treatment and metastatic progression
<p dir="ltr">Breast cancer is a major global health challenge as incidence is increasing, and risk of recurrence remains a significant concern for long-term survivors. In an ...
Abstract OI-1: OI-1 Decoding breast cancer predisposition genes
Abstract OI-1: OI-1 Decoding breast cancer predisposition genes
Abstract
Women with one or more first-degree female relatives with a history of breast cancer have a two-fold increased risk of developing breast cancer. This risk i...
Predictors of False-Negative Axillary FNA Among Breast Cancer Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study
Predictors of False-Negative Axillary FNA Among Breast Cancer Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study
Abstract
Introduction
Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) is commonly used to investigate lymphadenopathy of suspected metastatic origin. The current study aims to find the association be...


