Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Efficacy and safety of nitazoxanide in treating SARS-CoV-2 infection. A rapid and living systematic review and meta-analysis of blinded, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trials.
View through CrossRef
Introduction Nitazoxanide is a broad-spectrum antiparasitic that has
been tested for COVID-19 due to the anti-inflammatory effects and in
vitro anti-viral activity and promising clinical benefits against
influenza and other viruses. The aim of this study was to synthesize the
best evidence on the efficacy and safety of nitazoxanide as treatment
for patients with COVID-19. Methods Searches for studies were performed
in peer-reviewed and gray literature. The following elements were used
to define eligibility criteria: (1) Population, individuals with
laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection; (2) Intervention,
nitazoxanide; (3) Comparison, placebo; (4) Outcomes: positive RT-PCR
status, composite measure of disease progression (severe COVID-19, ICU
admission or invasive mechanical ventilation), death, serum biomarkers
of inflammation (C-reactive protein, IL-6, and IL-8), and any adverse
events; (5) Study type: blinded, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical
trials (RCT). Treatment effects were reported as relative risk (RR) and
mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results Four
blinded, placebo-controlled RCT were included in the meta-analysis and
enrolled individuals with mild or moderate SARS-CoV-2 infection. We
found no difference between nitazoxanide and placebo in the frequency of
positive RTP-PCR results (RR = 0.83; 95% CI 0.58 to 1.17) and there was
no decreased risk for disease progression (severe COVID-19, ICU
admission or invasive mechanical ventilation) (RR = 0.40; 95% CI 0.08
to 2.13) and deaths (RR = 0.55; 95% CI 0.18 to 1.68) among patients
receiving nitazoxanide. There were no differences for patients treated
with nitazoxanide and placebo in the levels of inflammatory markers.
Conclusions In this study, we found no current evidence from blinded,
placebo-controlled, RCT on the efficacy of nitazoxanide in treating
patients with COVID-19. This living systematic review should be updated
as soon as the results of ongoing RCT are published.
Title: Efficacy and safety of nitazoxanide in treating SARS-CoV-2 infection. A rapid and living systematic review and meta-analysis of blinded, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trials.
Description:
Introduction Nitazoxanide is a broad-spectrum antiparasitic that has
been tested for COVID-19 due to the anti-inflammatory effects and in
vitro anti-viral activity and promising clinical benefits against
influenza and other viruses.
The aim of this study was to synthesize the
best evidence on the efficacy and safety of nitazoxanide as treatment
for patients with COVID-19.
Methods Searches for studies were performed
in peer-reviewed and gray literature.
The following elements were used
to define eligibility criteria: (1) Population, individuals with
laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection; (2) Intervention,
nitazoxanide; (3) Comparison, placebo; (4) Outcomes: positive RT-PCR
status, composite measure of disease progression (severe COVID-19, ICU
admission or invasive mechanical ventilation), death, serum biomarkers
of inflammation (C-reactive protein, IL-6, and IL-8), and any adverse
events; (5) Study type: blinded, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical
trials (RCT).
Treatment effects were reported as relative risk (RR) and
mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).
Results Four
blinded, placebo-controlled RCT were included in the meta-analysis and
enrolled individuals with mild or moderate SARS-CoV-2 infection.
We
found no difference between nitazoxanide and placebo in the frequency of
positive RTP-PCR results (RR = 0.
83; 95% CI 0.
58 to 1.
17) and there was
no decreased risk for disease progression (severe COVID-19, ICU
admission or invasive mechanical ventilation) (RR = 0.
40; 95% CI 0.
08
to 2.
13) and deaths (RR = 0.
55; 95% CI 0.
18 to 1.
68) among patients
receiving nitazoxanide.
There were no differences for patients treated
with nitazoxanide and placebo in the levels of inflammatory markers.
Conclusions In this study, we found no current evidence from blinded,
placebo-controlled, RCT on the efficacy of nitazoxanide in treating
patients with COVID-19.
This living systematic review should be updated
as soon as the results of ongoing RCT are published.
Related Results
The Potential of Medicinal Plants and Bioactive Compounds in the Fight Against COVID-19
The Potential of Medicinal Plants and Bioactive Compounds in the Fight Against COVID-19
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), a novel coronavirus , is causing a serious worldwide COVID-19 pandemic. The emergence of strains with rapid spread and...
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Abstract
Introduction
Tarlatamab is a Delta-like ligand 3 (DLL3) -directed bispecific T-cell engager recently approved for use in patients with advanced small cell lung cancer (SCL...
The Hidden Problem of Cross-Reactivity: Challenges in HIV Testing During the COVID-19 Era: A Systematic Review
The Hidden Problem of Cross-Reactivity: Challenges in HIV Testing During the COVID-19 Era: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction
Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV2) surface glycoproteins, including shared epitope motifs, sho...
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract
The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical activi...
P-003 Impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection on circulating male sex hormones and human semen quality: a systematic review and meta-analysis
P-003 Impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection on circulating male sex hormones and human semen quality: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Study question
Does SARS-CoV-2 infection alter human male sex steroid hormones and semen quality?
...
Current therapeutic strategies for erectile function recovery after radical prostatectomy – literature review and meta-analysis
Current therapeutic strategies for erectile function recovery after radical prostatectomy – literature review and meta-analysis
Radical prostatectomy is the most commonly performed treatment option for localised prostate cancer. In the last decades the surgical technique has been improved and modified in or...
Kinetics of the humoral immune response to SARS-CoV-2: comparative analytical performance of seven commercial serology tests
Kinetics of the humoral immune response to SARS-CoV-2: comparative analytical performance of seven commercial serology tests
Abstract
Background
SARS-CoV-2 serology tests are clinically useful to document a prior SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with n...
Coronavirus infections in monocytes and macrophages
Coronavirus infections in monocytes and macrophages
Severe cases of SARS-CoV-2, the causative agent of COVID-19, are often accompanied by dysregulated immune responses. Monocytes and Macrophages, which are part of the innate immune ...

