Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Efficacy and safety of nitazoxanide in treating SARS-CoV-2 infection. A rapid and living systematic review and meta-analysis of blinded, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trials.

View through CrossRef
Introduction Nitazoxanide is a broad-spectrum antiparasitic that has been tested for COVID-19 due to the anti-inflammatory effects and in vitro anti-viral activity and promising clinical benefits against influenza and other viruses. The aim of this study was to synthesize the best evidence on the efficacy and safety of nitazoxanide as treatment for patients with COVID-19. Methods Searches for studies were performed in peer-reviewed and gray literature. The following elements were used to define eligibility criteria: (1) Population, individuals with laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection; (2) Intervention, nitazoxanide; (3) Comparison, placebo; (4) Outcomes: positive RT-PCR status, composite measure of disease progression (severe COVID-19, ICU admission or invasive mechanical ventilation), death, serum biomarkers of inflammation (C-reactive protein, IL-6, and IL-8), and any adverse events; (5) Study type: blinded, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trials (RCT). Treatment effects were reported as relative risk (RR) and mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results Four blinded, placebo-controlled RCT were included in the meta-analysis and enrolled individuals with mild or moderate SARS-CoV-2 infection. We found no difference between nitazoxanide and placebo in the frequency of positive RTP-PCR results (RR = 0.83; 95% CI 0.58 to 1.17) and there was no decreased risk for disease progression (severe COVID-19, ICU admission or invasive mechanical ventilation) (RR = 0.40; 95% CI 0.08 to 2.13) and deaths (RR = 0.55; 95% CI 0.18 to 1.68) among patients receiving nitazoxanide. There were no differences for patients treated with nitazoxanide and placebo in the levels of inflammatory markers. Conclusions In this study, we found no current evidence from blinded, placebo-controlled, RCT on the efficacy of nitazoxanide in treating patients with COVID-19. This living systematic review should be updated as soon as the results of ongoing RCT are published.
Title: Efficacy and safety of nitazoxanide in treating SARS-CoV-2 infection. A rapid and living systematic review and meta-analysis of blinded, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trials.
Description:
Introduction Nitazoxanide is a broad-spectrum antiparasitic that has been tested for COVID-19 due to the anti-inflammatory effects and in vitro anti-viral activity and promising clinical benefits against influenza and other viruses.
The aim of this study was to synthesize the best evidence on the efficacy and safety of nitazoxanide as treatment for patients with COVID-19.
Methods Searches for studies were performed in peer-reviewed and gray literature.
The following elements were used to define eligibility criteria: (1) Population, individuals with laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection; (2) Intervention, nitazoxanide; (3) Comparison, placebo; (4) Outcomes: positive RT-PCR status, composite measure of disease progression (severe COVID-19, ICU admission or invasive mechanical ventilation), death, serum biomarkers of inflammation (C-reactive protein, IL-6, and IL-8), and any adverse events; (5) Study type: blinded, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trials (RCT).
Treatment effects were reported as relative risk (RR) and mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).
Results Four blinded, placebo-controlled RCT were included in the meta-analysis and enrolled individuals with mild or moderate SARS-CoV-2 infection.
We found no difference between nitazoxanide and placebo in the frequency of positive RTP-PCR results (RR = 0.
83; 95% CI 0.
58 to 1.
17) and there was no decreased risk for disease progression (severe COVID-19, ICU admission or invasive mechanical ventilation) (RR = 0.
40; 95% CI 0.
08 to 2.
13) and deaths (RR = 0.
55; 95% CI 0.
18 to 1.
68) among patients receiving nitazoxanide.
There were no differences for patients treated with nitazoxanide and placebo in the levels of inflammatory markers.
Conclusions In this study, we found no current evidence from blinded, placebo-controlled, RCT on the efficacy of nitazoxanide in treating patients with COVID-19.
This living systematic review should be updated as soon as the results of ongoing RCT are published.

Related Results

The Potential of Medicinal Plants and Bioactive Compounds in the Fight Against COVID-19
The Potential of Medicinal Plants and Bioactive Compounds in the Fight Against COVID-19
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), a novel coronavirus , is causing a serious worldwide COVID-19 pandemic. The emergence of strains with rapid spread and...
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Abstract Introduction Tarlatamab is a Delta-like ligand 3 (DLL3) -directed bispecific T-cell engager recently approved for use in patients with advanced small cell lung cancer (SCL...
The Hidden Problem of Cross-Reactivity: Challenges in HIV Testing During the COVID-19 Era: A Systematic Review
The Hidden Problem of Cross-Reactivity: Challenges in HIV Testing During the COVID-19 Era: A Systematic Review
Abstract Introduction Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV2) surface glycoproteins, including shared epitope motifs, sho...
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical activi...
Current therapeutic strategies for erectile function recovery after radical prostatectomy – literature review and meta-analysis
Current therapeutic strategies for erectile function recovery after radical prostatectomy – literature review and meta-analysis
Radical prostatectomy is the most commonly performed treatment option for localised prostate cancer. In the last decades the surgical technique has been improved and modified in or...
Coronavirus infections in monocytes and macrophages
Coronavirus infections in monocytes and macrophages
Severe cases of SARS-CoV-2, the causative agent of COVID-19, are often accompanied by dysregulated immune responses. Monocytes and Macrophages, which are part of the innate immune ...

Back to Top