Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Monsters in Ancient Near Eastern Myth and Religion
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Monsters are characteristic of ancient Near (or Middle) Eastern visual art and texts from before the rise of writing (c.3000 bce) to the Hellenistic conquests and beyond. This chapter considers hybrid beings as diverse and complex entities within their ancient Middle Eastern contexts—Mesopotamia, Anatolia, and the Levant—as well as influences on monsters of the Mediterranean world. Monumental art, magic amulets, Akkadian epics like Enūma eliš, Gilgamesh, and Anzû, and the Hebrew Bible are discussed with the goal of showing that (1) ancient Middle Eastern monsters frequently act as pets or guardians of gods and heroes, which complicates simplistic characterizations of monsters as chaos emblems; (2) though associated with the frontier, monsters were prominently incorporated into the iconography of central palaces, like those of the Assyrians; and (3) Mesopotamian monster-discourse influenced that of the Levant—the Phoenicians, Aramaeans, etc.—on its way to informing Greek and Roman articulations.
Title: Monsters in Ancient Near Eastern Myth and Religion
Description:
Abstract
Monsters are characteristic of ancient Near (or Middle) Eastern visual art and texts from before the rise of writing (c.
3000 bce) to the Hellenistic conquests and beyond.
This chapter considers hybrid beings as diverse and complex entities within their ancient Middle Eastern contexts—Mesopotamia, Anatolia, and the Levant—as well as influences on monsters of the Mediterranean world.
Monumental art, magic amulets, Akkadian epics like Enūma eliš, Gilgamesh, and Anzû, and the Hebrew Bible are discussed with the goal of showing that (1) ancient Middle Eastern monsters frequently act as pets or guardians of gods and heroes, which complicates simplistic characterizations of monsters as chaos emblems; (2) though associated with the frontier, monsters were prominently incorporated into the iconography of central palaces, like those of the Assyrians; and (3) Mesopotamian monster-discourse influenced that of the Levant—the Phoenicians, Aramaeans, etc.
—on its way to informing Greek and Roman articulations.
Related Results
Kritik Mitos Tentang “Hang Tuah” Karya Amir Hamzah
Kritik Mitos Tentang “Hang Tuah” Karya Amir Hamzah
This study reveals the myth criticism on rhyme "Hang Tuah", an Amir Hamzah’s work expressing Malay myth. The Malay myth found in the rhyme "Hang Tuah" is placed as a meeting place ...
The Oxford Handbook of Monsters in Classical Myth
The Oxford Handbook of Monsters in Classical Myth
Abstract
This volume presents forty chapters about the unique and terrifying creatures from myths of the long-ago Near East and Mediterranean world, featuring aut...
Pearls from a Dark Cloud
Pearls from a Dark Cloud
Abstract
This chapter discusses monsters from the Persian mythological tradition, drawing on sacred and cosmogonic texts such as the Avesta and the Bundahishn, and f...
Ancient Monsters in Modern Science
Ancient Monsters in Modern Science
Abstract
The monsters of ancient myth made their way into modern science principally through the method of taxonomic nomenclature developed by Linnaeus as part of hi...
Psychoanalyzing Myth: From Freud to Winnicott
Psychoanalyzing Myth: From Freud to Winnicott
Abstract
The central difficulty I find in teaching Freud on myth is connecting myth to religion and therefore to the world. Teaching that Freud severs myth from the ...
Why monsters are dangerous
Why monsters are dangerous
Monsters and other imaginary animals have been conjured up by a wide range of cultures. Can their popularity be explained, and can their properties be predicted? These were long-st...
Rationalizing Mythic Monsters in Antiquity
Rationalizing Mythic Monsters in Antiquity
Abstract
This chapter describes the problems posed by mythical monsters when measured against strict standards of historical and biological plausibility. The fantast...

