Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Effects of different fracture parameters on microseisms induced by hydraulic fracturing

View through CrossRef
AbstractThe microseism induced by hydraulic fracturing is of great significance to the development of geothermal reservoirs and the site selection of geothermal systems. In this study, taking geothermal field data from Qiabuqia as a geological reference, several models are developed for hydraulic fracturing simulations based on the models included in the commercial FracMan™ software suit. A series of numerical simulations are carried out to explore the effects of different fracture parameters, including the existence of faults, in-situ stress state, fracture occurrence, and fracture distribution near faults, on the induced microseisms. The results show that during hydraulic fracturing, the existence of faults does affect the propagation direction of the newly generated fractures, causing the fractures to extend toward the fault. The faults also increase the magnitude of microseismic events and make the distribution of microseismic events farther. Under three different in-situ stress states, the magnitudes of induced microseisms and the distance between microseismic events and injection wells are different, mainly due to the different forms of energy release. The total energy of induced microseisms under the reverse faulting stress state (RF) is the largest. Under the normal faulting stress state (NF), the number of microseismic events is the least, with only 28, and these microseismic events are concentrated near the well, with the farthest distribution distance of only 150 m. The fracture occurrence has a significant effect on induced microseisms, mainly affecting the number and distribution range of induced microseisms. With the same number of fractures, as the fracture concentration to the fault increases, both the maximum magnitude and the farthest distribution distance of the induced microseisms increase.
Title: Effects of different fracture parameters on microseisms induced by hydraulic fracturing
Description:
AbstractThe microseism induced by hydraulic fracturing is of great significance to the development of geothermal reservoirs and the site selection of geothermal systems.
In this study, taking geothermal field data from Qiabuqia as a geological reference, several models are developed for hydraulic fracturing simulations based on the models included in the commercial FracMan™ software suit.
A series of numerical simulations are carried out to explore the effects of different fracture parameters, including the existence of faults, in-situ stress state, fracture occurrence, and fracture distribution near faults, on the induced microseisms.
The results show that during hydraulic fracturing, the existence of faults does affect the propagation direction of the newly generated fractures, causing the fractures to extend toward the fault.
The faults also increase the magnitude of microseismic events and make the distribution of microseismic events farther.
Under three different in-situ stress states, the magnitudes of induced microseisms and the distance between microseismic events and injection wells are different, mainly due to the different forms of energy release.
The total energy of induced microseisms under the reverse faulting stress state (RF) is the largest.
Under the normal faulting stress state (NF), the number of microseismic events is the least, with only 28, and these microseismic events are concentrated near the well, with the farthest distribution distance of only 150 m.
The fracture occurrence has a significant effect on induced microseisms, mainly affecting the number and distribution range of induced microseisms.
With the same number of fractures, as the fracture concentration to the fault increases, both the maximum magnitude and the farthest distribution distance of the induced microseisms increase.

Related Results

Sequential Propagation of Multiple Fractures in Horizontal Wells
Sequential Propagation of Multiple Fractures in Horizontal Wells
ABSTRACT: Simultaneous fracturing and zipper fracturing of horizontal wells has rapidly evolved to the development of unconventional oil and gas. The fracture int...
Study of Damage Evaluation of Hydraulic Fracturing to Reservoirs
Study of Damage Evaluation of Hydraulic Fracturing to Reservoirs
Abstract Classic hydraulic fracturing analysis is based on tensile strength of rock, failure criteria of fracture mechanics or Mohr-Coulomb criteria. The existing...
Perspectives of Unconventional Water Sources Implementation in Hydraulic Fracturing
Perspectives of Unconventional Water Sources Implementation in Hydraulic Fracturing
Abstract Currently, Russia experienced a rapid growth in horizontal wells drilling. The most popular method of completion is hydraulic fracturing. About 99% of hydra...
Three-Dimensional Geomechanical Modeling and Well Spacing Optimization Application in Sichuan Shale Gas Block
Three-Dimensional Geomechanical Modeling and Well Spacing Optimization Application in Sichuan Shale Gas Block
ABSTRACT: At present, unconventional reservoirs require horizontal drilling and large-scale hydraulic fracturing technology to increase artificial fracture networ...
Experimental laboratory study of hydraulic fracture interaction with pre-existing fault
Experimental laboratory study of hydraulic fracture interaction with pre-existing fault
Hydraulic fracturing remains the primary method of increasing hydrocarbon inflow to a borehole. Despite the many years of experience in using this method and the existence of vario...
Proppant Transport
Proppant Transport
Novotny, E.J., Member of SPE-AIME, Exxon Production Research Co. Abstract A method is presented for predicting:the transport of ...
Microseisms in North America
Microseisms in North America
SummaryThe microseisms in North America show in general the same peculiarities that they show in other regions, especially in Europe. When there is a storm near the coast we find s...

Back to Top