Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Ionospheric Disturbances and Irregularities During the 25–26 August 2018 Geomagnetic Storm

View through CrossRef
AbstractWe use ground‐based (GNSS, SuperDARN, and ionosondes) and space‐borne (Swarm, CSES, and DMSP) instruments to study ionospheric disturbances due to the 25–26 August 2018 geomagnetic storm. The strongest large‐scale storm‐time enhancements were detected over the Asian and Pacific regions during the main and early recovery phases of the storm. In the American sector, there occurred the most complex effects caused by the action of multiple drivers. At the beginning of the storm, a large positive disturbance occurred over North America at low and high latitudes, driven by the storm‐time reinforcement of the equatorial ionization anomaly (at low latitudes) and by particle precipitation (at high latitudes). During local nighttime hours, we observed numerous medium‐scale positive and negative ionospheric disturbances at middle and high latitudes that were attributed to a storm‐enhanced density (SED)‐plume, mid‐latitude ionospheric trough, and particle precipitation in the auroral zone. In South America, total electron content (TEC) maps clearly showed the presence of the equatorial plasma bubbles, that, however, were not seen in data of Rate‐of‐TEC‐change index (ROTI). Global ROTI maps revealed intensive small‐scale irregularities at high latitudes in both hemispheres within the auroral region. In general, the ROTI disturbance “imaged” quite well the auroral oval boundaries. The most intensive ionospheric fluctuations were observed at low and mid‐latitudes over the Pacific Ocean. The storm also affected the positioning accuracy by GPS receivers: during the main phase of the storm, the precise point positioning error exceeded 0.5 m, which is more than five times greater as compared to quiet days.
Title: Ionospheric Disturbances and Irregularities During the 25–26 August 2018 Geomagnetic Storm
Description:
AbstractWe use ground‐based (GNSS, SuperDARN, and ionosondes) and space‐borne (Swarm, CSES, and DMSP) instruments to study ionospheric disturbances due to the 25–26 August 2018 geomagnetic storm.
The strongest large‐scale storm‐time enhancements were detected over the Asian and Pacific regions during the main and early recovery phases of the storm.
In the American sector, there occurred the most complex effects caused by the action of multiple drivers.
At the beginning of the storm, a large positive disturbance occurred over North America at low and high latitudes, driven by the storm‐time reinforcement of the equatorial ionization anomaly (at low latitudes) and by particle precipitation (at high latitudes).
During local nighttime hours, we observed numerous medium‐scale positive and negative ionospheric disturbances at middle and high latitudes that were attributed to a storm‐enhanced density (SED)‐plume, mid‐latitude ionospheric trough, and particle precipitation in the auroral zone.
In South America, total electron content (TEC) maps clearly showed the presence of the equatorial plasma bubbles, that, however, were not seen in data of Rate‐of‐TEC‐change index (ROTI).
Global ROTI maps revealed intensive small‐scale irregularities at high latitudes in both hemispheres within the auroral region.
In general, the ROTI disturbance “imaged” quite well the auroral oval boundaries.
The most intensive ionospheric fluctuations were observed at low and mid‐latitudes over the Pacific Ocean.
The storm also affected the positioning accuracy by GPS receivers: during the main phase of the storm, the precise point positioning error exceeded 0.
5 m, which is more than five times greater as compared to quiet days.

Related Results

ANALYSIS OF GEOMAGNETIC DATABASES IMPACTING SPACE WEATHER
ANALYSIS OF GEOMAGNETIC DATABASES IMPACTING SPACE WEATHER
Through the complex analysis of the geomagnetic database of the Surlari Geomagnetic Observatory for over 80 years, corroborated with the data of other planetary observatories from ...
Total electron content responses to HILDCAAs and geomagnetic storms over South America
Total electron content responses to HILDCAAs and geomagnetic storms over South America
Abstract. Total electron content (TEC) is extensively used to monitor the ionospheric behavior under geomagnetically quiet and disturbed conditions. This subject is of greatest imp...
Ionospheric Induction of Earthquakes: Fitting the Data
Ionospheric Induction of Earthquakes: Fitting the Data
<p>This discussion assumes that there are ionospheric anomalies in total electron count (TEC) as precursors to major earthquakes. Very careful work by Thomas et al. (...
Morphology in the total electron content under geomagnetic disturbed conditions: results from global ionosphere maps
Morphology in the total electron content under geomagnetic disturbed conditions: results from global ionosphere maps
Abstract. Using 8-year global ionosphere maps (GIMs) of TEC products from the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), we make a statistical study on the morphology of the global ionospher...
Total electron content driven data products of SIMuRG
Total electron content driven data products of SIMuRG
<p>System for the Ionosphere Monitoring and Researching from GNSS (SIMuRG, see <em>https://simurg.iszf.irk.ru</em>) has been developed in ...
Statistical correlations between geomagnetic activity and high-latitude TIDs investigated with the Tromso Dynasode
Statistical correlations between geomagnetic activity and high-latitude TIDs investigated with the Tromso Dynasode
Travelling Ionospheric Disturbances (TID) and the underlying Atmospheric Gravity Waves (AGW) have long been associated with cases of extreme geomagnetic activity. This is especiall...
Studying the Fixing Rate of GPS PPP Ambiguity Resolution Under Different Geomagnetic Storm Intensities
Studying the Fixing Rate of GPS PPP Ambiguity Resolution Under Different Geomagnetic Storm Intensities
AbstractGlobal Positioning System (GPS) Precise Point Positioning (PPP) with correct fixing ambiguity resolution (AR) can reach cm‐mm level positioning accuracy. However, this accu...

Back to Top