Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Outcome of percutaneous endoscopic surgery for management of lumbar disc herniation
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Background
Lumbar disc herniation is a leading cause of back and leg pain. While open surgery is effective, it carries risks of tissue damage and prolonged recovery. Percutaneous endoscopic discectomy (PED) offers a minimally invasive alternative. This study evaluates the clinical outcomes of PED, focusing on efficacy and safety through a comprehensive statistical analysis of demographic data, surgical results, and key clinical parameters.
Methods
A prospective study was conducted on 20 patients with single-level unilateral lumbar disc herniation treated via either the interlaminar (65%) or transforaminal (35%) approach at the Neurosurgery Department, Menoufia University Hospital, between October 2020 and October 2022. Patients were followed for six months postoperatively.
Results
The cohort comprised 65% males and 35% females, with a mean age of 37 years. The most affected levels were L5-S1 (50%) and L4-L5 (45%). Mean preoperative Visual analoug scale (VAS) scores were 3.47 for back pain and 7.44 for leg pain. Postoperatively, back pain VAS scores decreased to 2.79 at 2 weeks, 2.20 at 3 months, and 1.38 at 6 months (p < 0.05). Leg pain VAS scores improved to 3.07, 2.13, and 0.76, respectively (p < 0.001). The mean Oswestry Disability index (ODI) score improved from 62 preoperatively to 23 at 3 months and 17 at 6 months (p < 0.001). The complication rate was 10% (2 cases). Based on the Modified Macnab criteria, 85% of patients achieved excellent outcomes, and 15% had good outcomes, resulting in a 100% favorable outcome rate. The transforaminal approach, typically performed under local anesthesia, was associated with shorter hospital stays compared to the interlaminar approach under general anesthesia.
Representative cases included a female patient with Rt sciatica and L5/S1disc herniation on MRI, and a male patient with Lt sciatica and Lt L4/5 disc herniation on MRI.
Conclusion
Endoscopic discectomy is an effective and safe treatment for lumbar disc herniation, providing significant improvements in pain and disability. While the choice of surgical approach can influence early postoperative outcomes, both interlaminar and transforaminal techniques demonstrate comparable long-term efficacy.
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Title: Outcome of percutaneous endoscopic surgery for management of lumbar disc herniation
Description:
Abstract
Background
Lumbar disc herniation is a leading cause of back and leg pain.
While open surgery is effective, it carries risks of tissue damage and prolonged recovery.
Percutaneous endoscopic discectomy (PED) offers a minimally invasive alternative.
This study evaluates the clinical outcomes of PED, focusing on efficacy and safety through a comprehensive statistical analysis of demographic data, surgical results, and key clinical parameters.
Methods
A prospective study was conducted on 20 patients with single-level unilateral lumbar disc herniation treated via either the interlaminar (65%) or transforaminal (35%) approach at the Neurosurgery Department, Menoufia University Hospital, between October 2020 and October 2022.
Patients were followed for six months postoperatively.
Results
The cohort comprised 65% males and 35% females, with a mean age of 37 years.
The most affected levels were L5-S1 (50%) and L4-L5 (45%).
Mean preoperative Visual analoug scale (VAS) scores were 3.
47 for back pain and 7.
44 for leg pain.
Postoperatively, back pain VAS scores decreased to 2.
79 at 2 weeks, 2.
20 at 3 months, and 1.
38 at 6 months (p < 0.
05).
Leg pain VAS scores improved to 3.
07, 2.
13, and 0.
76, respectively (p < 0.
001).
The mean Oswestry Disability index (ODI) score improved from 62 preoperatively to 23 at 3 months and 17 at 6 months (p < 0.
001).
The complication rate was 10% (2 cases).
Based on the Modified Macnab criteria, 85% of patients achieved excellent outcomes, and 15% had good outcomes, resulting in a 100% favorable outcome rate.
The transforaminal approach, typically performed under local anesthesia, was associated with shorter hospital stays compared to the interlaminar approach under general anesthesia.
Representative cases included a female patient with Rt sciatica and L5/S1disc herniation on MRI, and a male patient with Lt sciatica and Lt L4/5 disc herniation on MRI.
Conclusion
Endoscopic discectomy is an effective and safe treatment for lumbar disc herniation, providing significant improvements in pain and disability.
While the choice of surgical approach can influence early postoperative outcomes, both interlaminar and transforaminal techniques demonstrate comparable long-term efficacy.
Related Results
RISK FACTORS OF RECURRENCE LUMBAR INTERVERTEBRAL DISC HERNIATION AFTER PRIMARY ENDOSCOPIC TRANSFORAMINAL DISCECTOMY. PART 1 (LITERATURE REVIEW)
RISK FACTORS OF RECURRENCE LUMBAR INTERVERTEBRAL DISC HERNIATION AFTER PRIMARY ENDOSCOPIC TRANSFORAMINAL DISCECTOMY. PART 1 (LITERATURE REVIEW)
Percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy (PETD) is a minimally invasive technique that improves clinical outcomes. However, limited visibility of the surgical field and th...
Pre-operative magnetic resonance imaging as a predictor of success in lumbar disc herniation patients undergoing laminectomy
Pre-operative magnetic resonance imaging as a predictor of success in lumbar disc herniation patients undergoing laminectomy
Introduction. Lumbar disc herniation is a condition in which annulus fibrosus in the lumbar area is herniated with numerous etiologies, such as degenerative. One of the mainstay tr...
Efficacy of Transforaminal Steroid Block for Pain Relief Due to Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation in Previously Operated Case of Lumbar Discectomy
Efficacy of Transforaminal Steroid Block for Pain Relief Due to Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation in Previously Operated Case of Lumbar Discectomy
Background: lower Back discomfort as a result of a herniated disc is quite prevalent worldwide, frequently resulting in missed work days and significant changes in affect and motiv...
Correlation between facet tropism and lumbar disc herniation
Correlation between facet tropism and lumbar disc herniation
Abstract
Purpose The relationship between facet tropism (FT) and lumbar disc herniation (LDH) is not clear. In the present study, MRI was used to assess the relationship be...
Correlation Between Facet Tropism and Lumbar Disc Herniation
Correlation Between Facet Tropism and Lumbar Disc Herniation
Abstract
Purpose The relationship between facet tropism (FT) and lumbar disc herniation (LDH) is not clear. In the present study, MRI was used to assess the relationship ...
Stand-Alone Open Disectomy versus Fixation in Management of Recurrent Lumbar Disc Prolapse
Stand-Alone Open Disectomy versus Fixation in Management of Recurrent Lumbar Disc Prolapse
Abstract
Background
The strict definition of recurrent disc herniation is the presence of herniated disc material at the same le...
Post-decompression Disc Herniation - A More Common Complication. Comparison Between Minimally Invasive and "Mini-Open" Techniques
Post-decompression Disc Herniation - A More Common Complication. Comparison Between Minimally Invasive and "Mini-Open" Techniques
Background Index level disc herniation following lumbar spinal decompression is somewhat overlooked as postoperative complication, resulting in return of symptoms. It is proposed t...
Prevalence of asymptomatic lumbar disc herniation in heavy weight- lifters
Prevalence of asymptomatic lumbar disc herniation in heavy weight- lifters
Introduction: Lumbar disc herniation (LDH) is a prevalent spinal condition, especially among weightlifters, due to the mechanical load placed on the lumbar spine. This study aims t...

