Javascript must be enabled to continue!
We are all on the same team
View through CrossRef
The harmonious dance between academia and industry
This is an exciting time for RSV research. With the recent approval of the first-ever RSV vaccines and monoclonal antibody (mAb) for all infants, we are on the cusp of major advances in the prevention of RSV disease. Of these RSV vaccines, many are a result of joint research between academia and industry. The rationale is that these PPPs overcome challenges in financing, implementation and delivery of infrastructure and public services, based on the assumption that the private sector brings additional finance and competence and that private companies are inherently more efficient than the public sector in delivering high-quality public services. While the concept of PPPs appears straightforward, the implementation may face multiple challenges. PPPs are complex as the value for money is often ethically questioned and the procurement processes can be lenghty because of legal and regulatory barriers. Lack of transparency and accountability may be the top barrier of PPPs, however, legal barriers including approval and permits and law and regulation changes may also slow down the process. With RSV prevention within reach and the potential risk of PPPs creating complex challenges, we have explored how PPPs co-create value in RSV research.
Is industry-funded RSV research on balance beneficial? Clearly it is. Ultimately, the positives of PPPs in RSV research heavily outweigh the negatives. The question is not whether there may be conflicts of interest for – there are. Rather, the goal is to work around those and achieve a fair, transparent, unbiased, and scientifically valid result that benefits all. We cannot pretend that the public sector owns public health: promoting clarity and transparency in clinical research is an intrinsic public health good and a shared responsibility of both academia and industry. While pure academic research is an important adjuvant to industry-supported development, it cannot replace the focus or scope of industry funding.
In the graceful choreography uniting academia and industry, the orchestrated symphony of PPPs unveils not just scientific advancements, but also weaves a melodic tapestry of collaborative determination that forges a future fortified against RSV.
Title: We are all on the same team
Description:
The harmonious dance between academia and industry
This is an exciting time for RSV research.
With the recent approval of the first-ever RSV vaccines and monoclonal antibody (mAb) for all infants, we are on the cusp of major advances in the prevention of RSV disease.
Of these RSV vaccines, many are a result of joint research between academia and industry.
The rationale is that these PPPs overcome challenges in financing, implementation and delivery of infrastructure and public services, based on the assumption that the private sector brings additional finance and competence and that private companies are inherently more efficient than the public sector in delivering high-quality public services.
While the concept of PPPs appears straightforward, the implementation may face multiple challenges.
PPPs are complex as the value for money is often ethically questioned and the procurement processes can be lenghty because of legal and regulatory barriers.
Lack of transparency and accountability may be the top barrier of PPPs, however, legal barriers including approval and permits and law and regulation changes may also slow down the process.
With RSV prevention within reach and the potential risk of PPPs creating complex challenges, we have explored how PPPs co-create value in RSV research.
Is industry-funded RSV research on balance beneficial? Clearly it is.
Ultimately, the positives of PPPs in RSV research heavily outweigh the negatives.
The question is not whether there may be conflicts of interest for – there are.
Rather, the goal is to work around those and achieve a fair, transparent, unbiased, and scientifically valid result that benefits all.
We cannot pretend that the public sector owns public health: promoting clarity and transparency in clinical research is an intrinsic public health good and a shared responsibility of both academia and industry.
While pure academic research is an important adjuvant to industry-supported development, it cannot replace the focus or scope of industry funding.
In the graceful choreography uniting academia and industry, the orchestrated symphony of PPPs unveils not just scientific advancements, but also weaves a melodic tapestry of collaborative determination that forges a future fortified against RSV.
Related Results
Team Monitoring, Does it Matter for Team Performance? Moderating role of Team Monitoring on Team Psychological Safety and Team Learning
Team Monitoring, Does it Matter for Team Performance? Moderating role of Team Monitoring on Team Psychological Safety and Team Learning
Introduction: The use of work teams is a strategy that allows organizations to move faster and more proactively. Team performance is an interesting issue that needs to be studied m...
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract
The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical a...
Team reflections, team mental models and team performance over time
Team reflections, team mental models and team performance over time
Purpose
Although previous research proved positive impacts of team reflection on team outcomes, especially team performance and innovation, there are only a few insights in to whic...
Emergence of team engagement under time pressure: role of team leader and team climate
Emergence of team engagement under time pressure: role of team leader and team climate
PurposeThis paper aims to identify the determinants of team engagement emerging as a collective team-level phenomenon under time pressure context. The paper particularly explores h...
Team member involvement in team leader training and performance
Team member involvement in team leader training and performance
PurposeThis study seeks to: involve team members in part of the actual design of training for their own team leaders; improve team leader knowledge and skills; and demonstrate the ...
Team Processes
Team Processes
Team processes refer to the actions team members take to combine their individual resources, knowledge, and skill to resolve their task demands and achieve collective goals. These ...
Team Performance
Team Performance
The last twenty years of team research have seen a bloom in the publishing of team performance methods, frameworks, theories, and more. This bibliography offers research that is bo...
Piece by piece: Collaborative mosaic-making for inclusive policy development
Piece by piece: Collaborative mosaic-making for inclusive policy development
This report sets out the findings from one of four projects commissioned by Wellcome Policy Lab to pilot creative approaches to policy development. In this project, Scientia Script...

